CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 10:52:48 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 26

Author Topic: "Audiophoolery"?  (Read 10922 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #70 on: July 14, 2015, 04:43:35 PM »

That's not zealotry, that's physics.

What sort of physics exactly does all of that fall under? Or I suppose you can reduce any sort of observed phenomena to "physics" if you try hard enough.



Ethan Winer mostly talks out of his ass. Regurgitating certain audio metrics under his brand of "objectivity".
Logged

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #71 on: July 14, 2015, 04:47:33 PM »

Ah, but you have no problem misrepresenting Ethan's claims.

That's not zealotry, that's physics. If there's one parameter that he forgot to mention here, it is the fallibility of human perception.

In your opinion, Weiner's 4 noble truths (within the absolute context of 'ONLY' and 'EVERYTHING') are as certain as the sun being the center of our solar system. That's a preposterous equivocation when you can have amps and dacs that measure 'audibly identical' within those parameters sound different. I can run a line of people outside the door that will tell you a Lavry and Benchmark DAC do NOT sound identical under a properly setup blind test all day long. Anyone who can't hear the difference in just treble alone between those two is either inexperienced, deaf, or biased beyond repair. Same for a Ragnarok v. O2. There's about a zillion permutations I could come up with where Weiner's absolutism would simply fall on it's face.

Must be why psycho pseudo objectivists continue to harp on tubes distortion levels that are below those of the basic transducer.
 ::)

Speaking of the transducer, per Weiner, i should be able to take just about any transducer with the same or similar distortion measurements within the realm of audibility per your standards, EQ them identically, DSP them for the same correction and time based errors and they would sound identical. This is BS, they do NOT! I've been there, done that.

Honestly, remove audio from the equation for a sec. To me, anyone that uses terms like 'only' and 'everything' to make generalized absolutist comments is a psychotic nutjob one hair away from laying bricks for gas chambers. So yeah, zealot seems accurate to me.
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

maverickronin

  • Objectively Sound
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +58/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 670
  • Your friendly neighborhood audio skeptic
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #72 on: July 14, 2015, 04:51:42 PM »

Anyone who can't hear the difference in just treble alone between those two is either inexperienced, deaf, or biased beyond repair.

Yup.  We've all just got tin ears.  That must be it
Logged
Heaven's closed - Hell's sold out - So I walk on Earth.

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #73 on: July 14, 2015, 04:53:34 PM »

Yup.  We've all just got tin ears.  That must be it

Before you get all sensitive and start with the red herrings, have you tried comparing the Benchmark mk1 versus a Lavry? Probably not huh.

I use that example specifically because it's anetode's personal DAC and it absolutely doesn't sound anything like a Benchmark DAC, yet they should per yours and Weiners and anetode's belief system.

I'm frankly sick of hearing all amps and DACs that aren't measurably faulty or broken sound the same. It's load of total horseshit.  poo
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #74 on: July 14, 2015, 05:06:06 PM »

Yup.  We've all just got tin ears.  That must be it

Some people have tin ears, yes. Some electrical engineers definitely have tin ears, or are simply so biased that they discount their own perception. I'm sure there are some people that would fail an ABX test of an O2 vs. Rag, or a Yggy vs. Yulong. Those people probably shouldn't spend $1K+ per component, and should absolutely be using Monoprice or Blue Jeans.

The problem is when those people extrapolate "I can't hear a difference" into "there is no difference."
Logged

maverickronin

  • Objectively Sound
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +58/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 670
  • Your friendly neighborhood audio skeptic
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #75 on: July 14, 2015, 05:22:24 PM »

Before you get all sensitive and start with the red herrings, have you tried comparing the Benchmark mk1 versus a Lavry? Probably not huh.

I'm not really getting all sensitive but I'd like you to try and look at it from my perspective too.   ;)

With all the modding I've done, and learning to hear the difference between pad materials, subtle changes in damping, and even different types of felt I'm pretty sure I'm at least a golden ear to yours and OJ's platinum.

I use that example specifically because it's anetode's personal DAC and it absolutely doesn't sound anything like a Benchmark DAC, yet they should per yours and Weiners and anetode's belief system.

No I've never heard either of those but the specifics should really matter since according to you pretty much every DAC sounds different.  Which ones shouldn't I hear a difference between?  I'm honestly asking.  I've never noticed any difference between by ODAC or Focusrite 2i2.  If I run them into another amp, my UHA-4's DAC and Clip Zip sound the same as well.

With the exceptions of ones that have kludgey tube stages added on or noisy motherboard integrateds I don't recall ever hear a difference between DACs.

The problem is when those people extrapolate "I can't hear a difference" into "there is no difference."

I'd reverse that.  The problem is that people hear a difference and extrapolate into thinking it actually exists in the equipment and not in their brain's interpretation of it.

Even if absolutely everything really did sound the same people would still report differences because that's how the human brain works and we'd still need controlled testing discover that.


Logged
Heaven's closed - Hell's sold out - So I walk on Earth.

ultrabike

  • Burritous Supremus (and Mexican Ewok)
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +4226/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2384
  • I consider myself "normal"
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #76 on: July 14, 2015, 05:33:55 PM »

All I can say is that I'm happy with my cheapo equipments, and have no problem recommending them.

Still, I need to check that E09 Monoprice clone. It seems to distort as a pre-amp when pushed hard and is not giving me the voltage swing I expected. Actually the 2i2 works much better as a pre-amp (for the Mackies), but it is not stand alone.
Logged

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #77 on: July 14, 2015, 05:44:05 PM »

I'm not really getting all sensitive but I'd like you to try and look at it from my perspective too.   ;)

With all the modding I've done, and learning to hear the difference between pad materials, subtle changes in damping, and even different types of felt I'm pretty sure I'm at least a golden ear to yours and OJ's platinum.

No I've never heard either of those but the specifics should really matter since according to you pretty much every DAC sounds different.  Which ones shouldn't I hear a difference between?  I'm honestly asking.  I've never noticed any difference between by ODAC or Focusrite 2i2.  If I run them into another amp, my UHA-4's DAC and Clip Zip sound the same as well.

With the exceptions of ones that have kludgey tube stages added on or noisy motherboard integrateds I don't recall ever hear a difference between DACs.

I'd reverse that.  The problem is that people hear a difference and extrapolate into thinking it actually exists in the equipment and not in their brain's interpretation of it.

Even if absolutely everything really did sound the same people would still report differences because that's how the human brain works and we'd still need controlled testing discover that.




That's not a reversal. That's a separate unrelated claim.

Anyway, let's cut to the chase. Apparently you think people are hearing differences in $99 gear because they are looking at different LED colors or silver versus black chassis. Yes, I've never heard two of any amp or DAC sound identical to anything else, that's been the whole point. I've heard some sound similar or more closely related than to others, never identical. So let's do this.

Let's establish a set of listening parameters and tracks. You make notes on your method and listening notes and keep it for yourself. Send me the gear you tested (UHA4, Zip, ODAC, etc.) and I'll replicate the method and make my own notes. After we'll both compare and post here. We can even have another person we both know make their own notes. After I return the gear to you, then we can go over the posted notes and we can see who is or isn't hearing what.

Then people can even buy the same cheap gear and test for themselves to see what's what.
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

lm4der

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +24/-9
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 222
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #78 on: July 14, 2015, 05:46:21 PM »

Things are gettin' real in the Changstar parking lot.
Logged

ultrabike

  • Burritous Supremus (and Mexican Ewok)
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +4226/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2384
  • I consider myself "normal"
Re: "Audiophoolery"?
« Reply #79 on: July 14, 2015, 05:49:50 PM »

Have I heard differences between DACs? Not as much as with transducers.

Does a Zip/Clip sound dramatically different than my Focusrite (w/o pushing the volume to obvious distortion levels)? Not that much to me and under the conditions that I usually listen to them.

Do I think that two systems will sound the same if I remove all significant sources of distortion and noise, and if equalization can be achieved to perfectly match the two systems (sometimes this is fairly difficult and removing all sources of distortion at any level can be expensive)? Likely. But again, this may not be easy under all listening conditions and hardware configurations. In many cases it may actually be next to impossible. But in many cases one may get faily close. To the point that for some folks (including me) the differences maybe too subtle to matter.

Note two systems may behave failry similar under certain conditions, and not too similar under some others.

Note two properly set systems with similar characteristics may sound different more so cuz one day one was shit-faced vs when sober. Even if the two systems sound micro-different.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 26