CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:19:35 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14

Author Topic: Matrix X-Sabre Review  (Read 33139 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Matrix X-Sabre Review
« on: March 15, 2013, 10:51:00 PM »

« Last Edit: April 10, 2013, 02:27:04 PM by purrin »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2013, 10:51:11 PM »


All comments made compared to my personal references.  Less than shining commentary does not mean the gear in question is worse than a Sony Walkman from 1980, it is RELATIVE!  FFS.

Day 1

All listening thus far via coax w/ same tracks: Sheffield Labs #1 & #5 (pristine bass album), Scorpions Taken by Force #2 & #6 (digititus check album) and source (Denon CDT>DACs (Filter ‘Auto’ PWD, fw 2.2.0)>Super 7>modded HD800) so far, only swapping the same RCA and PS cables.

Out of the box fresh from Fedex, aluminum DAC monoblock is ice cold to touch.  Cold start, overly warm and smoothed over, flat dynamics, not good.  Gonna let it warm up.

Dynamics improving but still veiled but lifting slightly revealing an odd undertone of grain/grit in the overall signature.

Xsabre fully warmed up, excess warmth mostly gone, more clear, better dynamics now.  Smoother in the treble, still has sabre grit/grain sound PWD nails it in ultimate imaging, SS, precision, dynamics.  Bass is fuzzier, stuff bleeds into each other more than PWD.  Not too bad for the price and build quality.  Hides the Denon's treble hardness more and liquifies/sweetens it more than PWD.  I could see someone slotting it beneath the NAD M51 right where the respective prices are atm.  PWD has better ambient decay and reverb retrieval, dynamic contrasts just dig deeper and swing higher.  Timbre between instruments on the Matrix are just closer to each other making it slightly less involving.  For example, on the Sheffield Labs drum kit, there’s no way to really distinguish the timbral qualities of the individual elements.  Xsabre SS is incredibly wide, too wide I’d say for the HD800.  I get more extreme L/R and stuff coming from just behind my ears occasionally.  Reminds me of the Immersive U-shaped/horseshoe SS I got w/ the Westone 4 but shy of the 360 degree orbital SS of the SM3.

I can get the same affects using a different driver tube or replacing my Denon CDT w/ a Cambridge Audio Azur351 which delivers wonderfully sweet treble and precise imaging but more marshmellowy bass. 

I do see the appeal of smoothing out the treble of the HD800 and less than well mastered tracks, however, I’d consider this coloration which may or may not be appealing depending on the listener’s philosophy.  I will say that if the Matrix could equal the imaging precision and dynamic swings of the PWD I’d take the Matrix treble coloration and save the money and just enjoy not having to worry about HD800 or digital mastering issues as much. 

Day 2 (The gap narrows)

All listening done via PC (many tracks 16/44 and 24/96) > USB > both DACs (Filter ‘Auto’ PWD, fw 2.2.0)> Super 7 > HD800.  Only USB cable and RCAs were swapped.

Technical performance discrepancies between the two narrow.  Imaging tightens up and SS becomes more naturally focused in front for the Matrix.  The PWD becomes more nebulous/fuzzy compared to itself via coax and the Matrix but not quite to the extent of the Matrix’s globs via coax.

This item gets the coveted ‘Not Shit’ award.  Best Matrix product I’ve heard yet.

The PWD maintains a dynamic advantage with a blacker background over the Matrix but it does come closer now via USB.  Generally, the PWD sounds more in your face and exciting, instruments are more lively and 3D in their portrayal.  The Matrix is more relaxed, laid back and forgiving, but with that same SS width ‘advantage’ offering slightly more air.  Combined with less aggressive volume swings, instruments can breathe easier.  To me these dynamic differences are significant and important.  For example , when strings are played they are more alive, when the Conductor taps his rod or a performer lays down their bow, the timbral difference in wood touching a music stand pops more realistically.  A random yawn from the audience is just more lifelike and attention grabbing.  In other words, things that do not sound alike, sound less alike when they are not supposed to.   

Reconfirmed SPDIF impressions after USB testing on Day 2.

Honestly, not that radical a difference on my tuned rig at all.  Bear in mind, my amp and headphones are modded to fight against excessive grain and digititus.  After two days being powered on, the differences are not that big wrt grain, harshness levels.  I’d say that they are two sides of the neutral coin.  Smoother than natural versus harsher than natural or preferred.  Potential textural sacrifice versus enhancement or recording errors.  While the Matrix lets me listen to all my recordings without issue, that could be seen as a coloration.  The PWD mk2 could make less than pristine recordings become fatiguing, some might find that more honest or transparent.  Again, the digital bite differences for my rig were not that great after 48 hours of constant running.  So personal preferences and gear choices still rule.

Confirmation of Coax>USB on the PWD even w/ the mk2 upgrade which improves the USB side tremendously.  USB is superior to Coax on the XSabre which is why it came closer during USB comparisons.

Oh, if you want to smooth your treble on your PWD mk2, just hit Filter 1. ;)

   
« Last Edit: March 15, 2013, 11:13:29 PM by Analixus »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

twifosp

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +9/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2013, 10:57:19 PM »

Nice review.  Both of them.  I posted the same thing about the behind the ears sound in my impressions of it.
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2013, 10:58:36 PM »

Are you saying the headstage goes behind the ears? I wouldn't be surprised because the X-Sabre put the stage in front of the speakers. I've never heard something that like before.


photo credit below: Maxvla (it's cropped from the original)
« Last Edit: April 06, 2013, 10:26:03 PM by purrin »
Logged

twifosp

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +9/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2013, 11:00:15 PM »

It did for me.  My short impressions about it from the Austin meet:

XSabre Dac with my own system (In place of DA11).  HD800 (alo cable) and Super7.  Listening to Infected Mushroom Vicious Delicious.  Sounds very similar.  Might be smoother with a tad bit of resolution trade off, but hard to tell.  Appalachian Spring.  Sound stage sounds a bit far off to the sides, almost behind my ears.  Other than that, sounds very close.  Switch to Dire Straits Brothers in Arms.  Bass guitar sounds nice.  Good texture.  High hat is sharp, but not harsh.  Vocals are centered.  Might be a tad veiled compared to the DA11 but nit picking.  Switched back to DA11.  High hat not as sharp, but close.  Shimmer decay however is less stepped.  Less gradient to it.  What I heard as veil might just be that the Sabre is brighter.
Logged

Questhate

  • Stops to get gas, buys some stax.
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +83/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 916
  • Banned for putting ice cubes in fine Scotch
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2013, 11:11:17 PM »

Great read guys. Thanks for the efforts.
Logged

Kirosia

  • Unfaltering Taylor Swift Krusader
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +117/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 599
  • Psychologically uneven cotton
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2013, 11:47:28 PM »

This is some Kanye West malarkey
Logged
"Do you know why I wanted to start this war?... To make sure people like you aren't remembered when you die."

olor1n

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +56/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 294
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2013, 12:17:45 AM »

Really insightful comparison gents. I really like the format of distilling the important aspects for easy comparison, and the columns for further comments and rebuttals.


I'm slightly bemused by the assessment of the Gungnir though. Granted, I've not heard the other two components and the impressions are relative, but in absolute terms the praise imparted on the Gungnir just doesn't jive with the time I lived with it. Makes me wonder if there was something off with my particular unit, though other members at HF are now coming out of the woodwork and describing the same irks I found ultimately intolerable.


Anyway, good job again! The comparison tempers some of the building X-sabre hype, but it also showcases that Matrix have released a very good component at a great price.
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Matrix X-Sabre Review
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2013, 12:44:28 AM »

FWIW, this the FR of the speaker system I evaluated the DACs with.


This is the FR of the HE500 used in the evaluation


Keep in mind that many folks find the PWD in whatever iteration / configuration aggressive. And some actually find it too warm. The components used around such equipment do need to be taken into consideration. One ultimately needs to ask if they are hearing the DAC, the amp, or the transducers.
Logged

Maxvla

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +211/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1251
Re: Matrix X-Sabre
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2013, 02:50:21 AM »

Really insightful comparison gents. I really like the format of distilling the important aspects for easy comparison, and the columns for further comments and rebuttals.


I'm slightly bemused by the assessment of the Gungnir though. Granted, I've not heard the other two components and the impressions are relative, but in absolute terms the praise imparted on the Gungnir just doesn't jive with the time I lived with it. Makes me wonder if there was something off with my particular unit, though other members at HF are now coming out of the woodwork and describing the same irks I found ultimately intolerable.


Anyway, good job again! The comparison tempers some of the building X-sabre hype, but it also showcases that Matrix have released a very good component at a great price.
Sorry for the late reply, was busy at work then had errands to run before coming home where I could type a considered reply.

I also was impressed with the format and review. PWD2 aside (I didn't have the best trial of that DAC), I really can't agree with most of the comparisons between the Gungnir and X-Sabre. The areas which Marv rated poorly for the X-Sabre I felt would be clear cut advantages, so it's weird to see things I thought of as strengths be shown as weaknesses. Bass control, microdynamics and fluidity of time, and the big one, treble, were areas I thought the X-Sabre clearly was superior to the Gungnir. Bass control was probably the smallest advantage to the Gungnir out of this group, but it was still present. Gripping, well textured bass that could hit hard and disappear instantly was one of the first things I noticed when I listened to the X-Sabre. Microdynamics, which is absolutely key to making music involving, was again a step up, letting each element have it's own volume level making things very interesting and engaging. The fluidity of time aspect crept up on me, and I didn't notice it until I switched back to the Gungnir and it just felt disjointed and just rough overall in how the songs progressed. The treble is surprising because I felt it was extremely detailed (something else that was not well received) but not bright or biting, and certainly not digital. With the large soundstage and added air, the treble felt much more natural and relaxing, but not all that forgiving either. I felt the tonal balance was basically the same, but those were rated differently as well.

Those are fairly big things, IMO, but the biggest one was how constrictive the Gungnir is and I never knew it until the X-Sabre arrived. The Gungnir puts me in this state of permanent slight-tension like I'm constantly bracing for something bad or an impact, etc. I always thought it was weird how my headphone rig (Gungnir/BHA/800) seemed to tense me up, but I thought it was the analytical nature of the BHA-800 combination, both being considered slightly bright, analytical components. Putting the X-Sabre in the rig felt like taking a deep breath and letting it go. That alone made the X-Sabre the victor between the Gungnir and itself.

As for X-Sabre hype, there is a difference between hype and favor. Before this review only John (project86) and myself had possession of one, and anyone else who had heard it was under meet conditions and really couldn't get too detailed in their opinions because of that. Both John and I really do like the X-Sabre so yes, the two people who have one like it. That isn't hype. The fact that neither of us really have had favorable opinions of the PWD is more a criticism of the PWD than a hype move for the X-Sabre. I've said ever since I A/B'd the X-Sabre and Concero in Nick's hotel room, that the X-Sabre isn't even the best deal, that the Concero is better value, getting almost the same sound but with fewer features.

If I were an outsider looking in at the comments in this review, I'd see overall the Gungnir is slightly favored and costs $350 less. Purrin's recommendation at the bottom of the X-Sabre column combined with the recommendation at the bottom of the Gungnir column would confuse the hell out of me.

I guess it's confirmed now after the BHA-1 and now the X-Sabre that we hear very differently, perhaps opposite. When I joined here I thought we might have closer hearing since our priorities seemed to be similar and your approach to measurement based subjectivism made a lot of sense to me. At least now I know where we stand so I can judge gear based on how you comment on it and how that translates to what I will hear. As for the PWD, that will have to wait for a later date, probably a California meet, since I'm certainly not willing to bring a PWD in. Something else that is very different between us, is that since joining here I've grown further towards the headphones only side, and Marv has grown further towards the speaker side. This may account for some of our differences, but as I've stated before it was the X-Sabre that made my speaker rig even listenable once again, a huge improvement in that rig compared to the Gungnir.

So far the X-Sabre is the best pure DAC I've heard to date, all inclusive. That said, the DAC in the Boulder flagship CD player may trump it since that seems more and more likely the reason I liked Ray's setups at RMAF.

All said, I respectfully disagree.  :)p3
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14