CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 10:55:29 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 17

Author Topic: Nonsensical audio terms  (Read 19977 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

donunus

  • Cheapus Sexus
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +52/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 875
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #90 on: January 19, 2013, 06:54:45 AM »

What's a non colored headphone?  A headphone that masks all recordings equally?  There is certainly an aspect to detail retrieval related to driver capability independent of FR bias.  If someone can't tell 128kb from 320kb (assuming a properly dynamic track) that phone/rig is masking and simply not accurate.

I get what you're saying about ultimately everything is colored, and there are different ways of being colored.  Making errors and masking information.  But I was just talking about the blame game.  "revealing" is probably the most misused word on head-fi.

There^^^ I can't agree with uou more on that one. I hate it when something is bright and peaky, its always called revealing. Its more like picky because of being colored LOL
Logged
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #91 on: January 19, 2013, 08:06:23 AM »

Did a Beyer man just say that?   :)) :)p17
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

AstralStorm

  • Speculation and Speculums
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +250/-164
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 559
  • Warning: causes nearby electronics to go haywire
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #92 on: January 19, 2013, 10:01:51 AM »

I just don't see how soundstage size relates to a concert.  It's just small soundstage.  Or the soundstage is projected behind you. 

There is equipment that really has no appreciable "sound" to it. I wouldn't call it "chameleon", just perceptually flat - the problem is that some people associate flat with "atonal". "Chameleon" feature is usually due to mostly flat signature - slanted is also ok, as long as the slant isn't huge. Meaning no dips/humps.

SE-5 is not it at all, it has some relatively small peaks in 3-5k range, a bass hump and a high end shelf, with peaks too. It definitely has a sound.
So yes, the soundstaging is all over the place (w/o equalization) due to those features, like in SM3. Even with equalization, the weird gradation of thickness also plays a role, from thick, hard hitting bass to thin highs with some Ety-style "oversharp" ringing.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2013, 10:30:29 AM by AstralStorm »
Logged
For sale: Hifiman HE-500; Paradox; Brainwavz B2. PM me if you would like to buy them.

Rabbit

  • Guest
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #93 on: January 19, 2013, 10:16:28 AM »

How about the references to location in the audience that people frequently use?  Can't remember the exact phrasing.  But I often read people placing headphones in a very precise location in an audience.  Like "the Grados man, I love them cause they put me ON the stage man, the ATH's are like 4 rows back, and the HD650 is just boring, it's way in the back of the concert hall and I just fall asleep".  I'm always thinking ...."what?"  What the hell does that mean?  Maybe I haven't been to enough concerts or something I don't know, it just seems like BS to me.

Interesting example, here's a translation:

"the Grados man, I love them cause they put me ON the stage man"
=
"the drivers are pressed right against my fucking ears"

"the ATH's are like 4 rows back"
=
"holy fuck, the driver's further back and the pads are comfy. it's like, more spacious and engineered and shit"

"the HD650 is just boring, it's way in the back of the concert hall and I just fall asleep"
=
"dude, where did the treble go?"

(it's way too easy to translate pompous audiophile to stonerspeak)

It's interesting to see how you translate those statements as well because that's not exactly how I would translate them. You're kind of taking what is said 'literally' which is not what is meant (I think) when it's written.

"the Grados man, I love them cause they put me ON the stage man"
=
They are aggressive sounding because the music sounds as though it's very close.

"the ATH's are like 4 rows back"
=
They are smoother sounding and not too aggressive.

"the HD650 is just boring, it's way in the back of the concert hall and I just fall asleep"
=
(What you actually said) Where's the treble?

Interesting in that you are equating the statements mostly to 'physical causes' of the sound and I think of it more in terms of how would you describe the sound.

I obviously like headphones, but... they sound like headphones.  Every one I've ever heard, if nothing else for the fact that my brain doesn't contexualize what I'm hearing with anything in my enviornment.

That's about it really. Two inch drivers trying to cram a band or orchestra in there. So back to 'what is neutral' or correct in a headphone? One man's bass is another man's poison. One man's shrieky treble is another man's detail. Who is 'correct'?

I like the figures but enjoy reading what people SAY about their gear. One's fact, the other's an emotional response. Room for both.
Logged

AstralStorm

  • Speculation and Speculums
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +250/-164
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 559
  • Warning: causes nearby electronics to go haywire
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #94 on: January 19, 2013, 10:41:52 AM »

Oh, there is one thing that "PRaT" could be meaningfully translated to.

Whether a headphone or IEM sounds distorts at higher SPL. I'd call it "compressed" instead though, as in dynamic range compression.
Pace/Timing, gets affected due to the delay in percussion. Rhythm, same. Tune/Pitch, obviously if the compression happens at higher frequencies too.
I know two IEMs and one headphone myself that have this issue: Brainwavz B2 in bass, Sleek Audio SA6, Sennheiser HD497. It's not that common.

A different related phenomenon is "one note bass", that one is due to frequency response peak in the bass.

Here's someone's endeavor into this term: http://www.tnt-audio.com/edcorner/prat_e.html
I don't agree with this.
I prefer this translation: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=prat
« Last Edit: January 19, 2013, 10:50:09 AM by AstralStorm »
Logged
For sale: Hifiman HE-500; Paradox; Brainwavz B2. PM me if you would like to buy them.

Deep Funk

  • Sure is fond of ellipses...
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +111/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2344
  • Born in 1988, eclectic 90-ties!
    • Radjahs2cents
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #95 on: January 19, 2013, 04:30:46 PM »

Urban Dictionary...

That gives "throwing the book at it" a new spin. How pratty...
Logged
Few things keep me sane: my loved ones, my music and my hobbies. Few is almost an understatement here...

donunus

  • Cheapus Sexus
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +52/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 875
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #96 on: January 19, 2013, 06:04:29 PM »

Did a Beyer man just say that?   :)) :)p17

I'm not a beyer man, I hate standard beyers  :vomit: The beyer I have is darker than an hd600  :)p13
Logged
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #97 on: January 19, 2013, 06:12:38 PM »

SE-5 is not it at all, it has some relatively small peaks in 3-5k range, a bass hump and a high end shelf, with peaks too. It definitely has a sound.  So yes, the soundstaging is all over the place (w/o equalization) due to those features, like in SM3. Even with equalization, the weird gradation of thickness also plays a role, from thick, hard hitting bass to thin highs with some Ety-style "oversharp" ringing.

I think there's more to it than FR in that case.  I used to have the SM3 and Monster Miles Davis side by side.  They both had a very similar FR they way I was listening to them.  While the SM3 was all over the place the MD's were consistent in their presentation with each track.  Leads me to believe there was some impact from the multiple drivers and crossover network versus a single full range driver.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Rabbit

  • Guest
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #98 on: January 19, 2013, 06:38:58 PM »

This thread has got me looking for quotes now:

Do you know what they mean by faster and upfront?

A headphone that is faster? (more treble?)
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #99 on: January 19, 2013, 06:50:22 PM »

It has been said that a strong treble edge gives the impression of greater speed or 'PRaT'.  Hence Grados+rock.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 17