CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:23:58 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15

Author Topic: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?  (Read 9647 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

AllanMarcus

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +2/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 28
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #90 on: September 06, 2015, 03:27:12 PM »

Hi guys, this is my first post, I want to share my thoughts.

1. How come a digital audio signal, which is rarely over 1MB/s (0.8 MB/s for DSD128), can be easily distorted and needs special purifiers in order to secure the integrity, when a USB3 SSD hard drive  which uses 100-200 MB/s can get tons of data without altering it?

2. Im aware that you can get noise from the USB power, and it depends on the design of the dac/amp/usb reciever, but, if you have usb noise chances are you have a bad computer, maybe something old with an oem psu and a low end mobo, there is a huge difference between that and a propper 80+gold psu with a decent brand motherboard, I build computers and I know good components and configuration can make a difference in audio for instance. (maybe a good power regulator if you have mains noise)

3. I think we can test these purifiers by conecting the purifiers out back to the pc and comparing the data.

One theory is bits is bits. The other theory is if is sounds better, it sounds better.

I think when you copy data to a drive, you get error checking, and the timing of the bits doesn't matter. With audio, both of those matter.

There is a post earlier where a guy measure distortion and found less with a filter
Logged

jer

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +7/-9
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #91 on: September 06, 2015, 04:01:45 PM »

Thank Jer. Can you try one thing? Remove the in-line JitterBug and just try the other one? I have to admit, I'm just curious.

Also, I'm really curious if you can hear a difference between the JitterBug "enhanced" system vs. a TOSLink cable.

I'll have an opportunity to at least see a JB at RMAF, and hopefully hear system with them. 


Strangely enough, that's how we started the adventure. My friend's system is a bit fickle (the Aries and the Mytek in concert often develop "sync-lock" issues) and he was wary of doing too many disconnections. We started with one in the secondary port (no cable attached) and it made a nice impact -- a much bigger one than I was expecting, as I'd always tried them inline first and then added from there.  To my ears, a single JB in the secondary port manifested ~40% of the overall delta with two inserted. He described it more like 50/50. Being his system, I knew better than to argue with what his ears were telling him in his own house. At the end of the day, 50/50 or 60/40 is essentially told us the same thing. Both of us heard worthwhile differences each way. ;)

edit: Regarding TOSlink, that wasn't an option he wanted to explore having given up on the Mytek's TOSLink port a long time ago in favor of a Wireworld Platinum Starlight USB and then a Light Harmonic Lightspeed USB cable. The USB just sounds so much better. Speculating: perhaps due to jitter in all the optical<->digital translations?   

Logged
-jer

AllanMarcus

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +2/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 28
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #92 on: September 06, 2015, 05:08:23 PM »

edit: Regarding TOSlink, that wasn't an option he wanted to explore having given up on the Mytek's TOSLink port a long time ago in favor of a Wireworld Platinum Starlight USB and then a Light Harmonic Lightspeed USB cable. The USB just sounds so much better. Speculating: perhaps due to jitter in all the optical<->digital translations?   

Thanks for the info. Highly unlikely the toslink issues are rated so jitter, unless you have a 50' cable. Even then, it's unlikely. People take about a jitter with toslink, but physics tells us the chance of the light bouncing around inside the cable in such a way that would affect the timing is very slim, especially in a short cable. It. Ore likely the resolution was set at different rates for his toslink vs his USB. Even more likely it was placebo effect
Logged

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #93 on: September 06, 2015, 05:59:02 PM »

toslink does have higher measured jitter than spdif even at 3' or likely even 1'. Whether you want to argue audibility is another thing, but the measured difference is there as a matter of fact.
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

AllanMarcus

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +2/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 28
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #94 on: September 06, 2015, 06:06:39 PM »

toslink does have higher measured jitter than spdif even at 3' or likely even 1'. Whether you want to argue audibility is another thing, but the measured difference is there as a matter of fact.


Er, toslink is S/PDIF, as is 75ohm coax. S/PDIF is a software layer (the protocol, if you will).

BTW, interesting article on jitter from nwavguy
http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/02/jitter-does-it-matter.html
Logged

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #95 on: September 06, 2015, 06:20:14 PM »


Er, toslink is S/PDIF, as is 75ohm coax. S/PDIF is a software layer (the protocol, if you will).

BTW, interesting article on jitter from nwavguy
http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/02/jitter-does-it-matter.html


I say SPDIF because it's better than saying RCA. Obviously when I compare toslink to spdif I'm not comparing it to itself so no need to be pedantic when you obviously understand the point being made.

Please don't ever link a nwavloser link to me again. Keep that dougself garbage away from me. Thx a bunch. It's nice for people that can't think for themselves looking for audio jesus or those that lack critical hearing experience.
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

frenchbat

  • Batshit Frenchy
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +22/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 255
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #96 on: September 06, 2015, 06:26:28 PM »

I say SPDIF because it's better than saying RCA. Obviously when I compare toslink to spdif I'm not comparing it to itself so no need to be pedantic when you obviously understand the point being made.

Please don't ever link a nwavloser link to me again. Keep that dougself garbage away from me. Thx a bunch. It's nice for people that can't think for themselves looking for audio jesus or those that lack critical hearing experience.

LOL yeah. All hail our Messiah !
Logged

Thad E Ginathom

  • Politically Incorrect Ex-Hippie
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +25/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 648
  • In the end... cats.
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #97 on: September 06, 2015, 06:27:34 PM »

Hold hands over ears, close eyes and repeat... Optical cables cause  jitter Optical cables cause  jitter Optical cables cause  jitter Optical cables cause  jitter Optical cables cause  jitter  :)p8 . <Cross-posted: insert "audible">
Tell you what, though: bend them a bit too much and they do indeed sound bad. I thought I'd broken one, but when I pulled the box a bit further from the wall, it was fine.

What is it with USB Audio? If all the bad stuff is true, then, notwithstanding the fact that it works just fine for all other values of "Universal,"  when it comes to Audio, it is just plain broken. So why on earth is it becoming the almost-defacto choice for carrying audio?  Until recently, it was not the choice of a lot of pro/semi-pro/home-studio gear: Firewire was. So why has non-pro audio gone all usbacious on us? Has it all headed, unstoppably, down the wrong path?

I'm a bits-are-bits man. Have I never had any [attributed to] USB problems? Wish I could say so, but it wouldn't be true.

Did I ever experience glitches and variable sound quality with my Firewire box? Getting it to work with Linux was a tears of blood job, oh and the DPC latency problem with windows on my previous PC, but that affected all audio and is why I got rid of the machine.

My answers to all the USB questions: Yes, No, and Maybe. But most of all... why?

Quote (selected)
Please don't ever link a nwavloser link to me again. Keep that dougself garbage away from me. Thx a bunch. It's nice for people that can't think for themselves looking for audio jesus or those that lack critical hearing experience.

And is NwAvGuy hiding in my outhouse? Ahh... questions... questions*...

(I think he's holed up with Assange in London's Ecuador Embassy. I guess that puts Ecuador off Anaxilus's holiday list)


*No... only cats get refugee status here,
Logged
Cats are nice

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #98 on: September 06, 2015, 06:49:11 PM »

Hi guys, this is my first post, I want to share my thoughts.

1. How come a digital audio signal, which is rarely over 1MB/s (0.8 MB/s for DSD128), can be easily distorted and needs special purifiers in order to secure the integrity, when a USB3 SSD hard drive  which uses 100-200 MB/s can get tons of data without altering it?

2. Im aware that you can get noise from the USB power, and it depends on the design of the dac/amp/usb reciever, but, if you have usb noise chances are you have a bad computer, maybe something old with an oem psu and a low end mobo, there is a huge difference between that and a propper 80+gold psu with a decent brand motherboard, I build computers and I know good components and configuration can make a difference in audio for instance. (maybe a good power regulator if you have mains noise)

3. I think we can test these purifiers by conecting the purifiers out back to the pc and comparing the data.

1. Because you are comparing apples and oranges. USB streaming works over Isochronous mode, which works in real time and has no error correction. Older adaptive mode implementations are also especially bad, because the clock is controlled by the computer, and the CPU isn't particularly interested in the level of output jitter going to your USB DAC.

USB hard drives, printers, thumb drives, etc work in Block mode. The data is sent is sent in packets not in real time, and these packets are error checked and corrected. That's how you can copy your Word document to your thumb drive and get a bit-exact copy, without the need for a USB filter. Keyboards and mice work in a 3rd mode called Bulk Interrupt, and they don't need filters either.

2. USB noise has nothing to do with having a "bad" computer. Any channel motherboard from any brand is not designed for ultra low noise applications when there is no demand for it from 99.9% of buyers. Similarly, even the best 80+ Gold or 80+ Platinum ATX switching power supply creates a substantial amount of noise, as does any switching power supply. It's baked into the cake. Aside from the switching noise itself, the very best ATX power supplies can get down to around 15mV of DC ripple on their 12/5/3.3V outputs. Any decent linear supply can produce closer to 1mV of ripple. NO ATX power supply can get anywhere close to that, and the best linears will be under 1mV.

The amount of DC ripple produced by the ATX power supply on its outputs are also not what you actually end up with on the VBus line from a motherboard output. That will be on the order of 250mV-700mV. A typical laptop running on its power brick will be closer to 1000mV. Compare that to <1mV produced from a 5V linear power supply.
Logged

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: USB cleaner, purifiers, decrapifiers?
« Reply #99 on: September 06, 2015, 06:59:10 PM »

Thanks for the info. Highly unlikely the toslink issues are rated so jitter, unless you have a 50' cable. Even then, it's unlikely. People take about a jitter with toslink, but physics tells us the chance of the light bouncing around inside the cable in such a way that would affect the timing is very slim, especially in a short cable. It. Ore likely the resolution was set at different rates for his toslink vs his USB. Even more likely it was placebo effect

Toslink has enormous amounts of jitter. It's an inherently shitty interface. This is a thing we can measure, it's not up for debate. Although glass Toslink cables are better than plastic, that's still just polishing the turd that is the Toslink interface. It's not because the light is "bouncing around" inside the cable. It's because S/Pdif is not an optical signal. It's electrical. So at the Tx end, the electrical signal must be converted to optical, and at the Rx end, the same process happens in reverse. It's this double conversion process that introduces so much timing error. The length of the cable is basically irrelevant. The shittier these electrical/optical converters are, the worse Toslink will sound. The one Apple uses in their Macbooks for example seems to be of particularly atrocious quality.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15