CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:29:10 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20

Author Topic: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?  (Read 7864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #150 on: August 18, 2015, 03:18:52 AM »

Among the various digital connection methods (I2S, AES/EBU, S/Pdif via coax, Toslink, ST glass fiber, FireWire, and USB) USB is uniquely ill suited for streaming audio. The FireWire protocol is actually much better for audio than Isochronous mode USB streaming, which is why Weiss was so resistant to using USB instead of FireWire for such a long time.

You've got a very noisy ground path, a very noisy powerline loaded with DC ripple (500mV+ from a typical motherboard USB port) and a data connection that streams whenever the CPU can be bothered to get around to sending it, not necessarily when the DAC might want it. If you were designing a digital streaming connection from scratch, USB is pretty much the worst thing you could possibly come up with.


Slowly but surely over the years, designers and engineers have figured out how to work around the problems, starting with asynchronous mode, adding electrical isolation, etc. With a well designed input, and a computer with a well designed dedicated output card as opposed to a standard shared bus port, in my experience you can match or exceed the performance of most conventional digital transports with a computer and USB.

And yes, you can say "digital is digital its all 1s and 0s bit-perfect LOLLOLOLOLOL" all that says to me is "I don't know what I'm talking about."

Ok, so why would I want to use USB at all? Before you were telling us that USB is better than AES/SPDIF, but then you just listed all the problems inherent to USB that dedicated audio transmission protocols don't have. Something doesn't add up.

BTW I know some guys that would laugh at you for saying Firewire is a better transfer protocol for audio. Where are you getting this from?
Logged

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #151 on: August 18, 2015, 03:42:41 AM »

Ok, so why would I want to use USB at all? Before you were telling us that USB is better than AES/SPDIF, but then you just listed all the problems inherent to USB that dedicated audio transmission protocols don't have. Something doesn't add up.

BTW I know some guys that would laugh at you for saying Firewire is a better transfer protocol for audio. Where are you getting this from?

Until a few years ago, you would not want to use USB. If you remember back to the DACs that first started appearing with TI PCM2704 based USB inputs, even the manufacturers themselves would say look, the input is there for convenience. It's garbage and we don't really recommend you use it unless you have no other choice. That was then.

The PCM2704 was replaced with newer, better performing chips, which were in turn replaced with newer, better performing chips. I don't think Wavelength "invented" asynchronous mode streaming to replace the old adaptive mode, but they did popularize it. Asynchronous was a whole new ball of wax for USB, making it much closer to what FireWire already had. The latest XMOS chipset and software stack, when properly implemented, can be very good, which is likely why FireWire has largely died out except on professional multi-channel AD/DA products.

So with the input out of the way, you then have to look at the output. You don't want to use a standard motherboard port. It's incredibly noisy, and everything basically ends up in a big bucket along with USB keyboards and whatever other devices you have attached. What you want is a dedicated PCI-e USB card, with a dedicated power supply. The SoTM card was one of the first, and they have a newer model with a USB 3.0 port, but the JCAT card I think is the current gold standard.

Once both the input and output are up to snuff, USB will outperform AES/EBU outputs from Lynx and RME sound cards. It will also outperform most lower cost Ethernet based network streamers, as well as typical disc spinning transports (IME). I don't know how something like the Aurender W20's USB output compares to its AES or S/Pdif output, or how it compares to something like a Naim NDS streaming via Ethernet as opposed to pulling from local storage like the W20.

Logged

madaboutaudio

  • Jude's Closet Lover
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +32/-28
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 213
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #152 on: August 18, 2015, 03:47:40 AM »

The older USB chipset/design/ports used to be very noisy and poor performing.

Firewire used to be very superior due to it's higher bandwidth vs usb 1.1 at one point in time.

Here's an article explaining digital latency:
https://www.presonus.com/community/Learn/The-Truth-About-Digital-Audio-Latency

USB audio used to be synchronous, meaning it require a constant and consistent stream of data if not it will suffer from buffer underrun or overruns and such. However the problem has been somewhat solved with asynchronous transfer.

Logged

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #153 on: August 18, 2015, 04:04:16 AM »

USB will outperform AES/EBU

Could you explain this?
Logged

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #154 on: August 18, 2015, 04:40:34 AM »

Good USB to my ears sounds better than a Lynx AES16e or RME HDSPe connected to a DAC via AES. The sub $1,000, self contained, single card pro recording sound cards are just not that good - they can be beaten by a good USB DAC and USB output card. When slaved to a word clock generator they'll do better, their internal clocks are a major weakness, but that's obviously significantly more cost on top of the cards that cost $700-800. For example, Tascam's master clock generators start at around $1300, and others go for similar money.

So you could slave the Lynx or RME to a master clock, and then avoid USB if you want, but you're now looking at $2000+, and you'll likely still lose to a JCAT/Empirical Off-Ramp 5 combo.
Logged

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #155 on: August 18, 2015, 04:49:33 AM »

But most DACs won't clock off the digital inputs but rather use their own interal clocking/PLL to generate the clock. It's asynchronous just like USB. I feel like that argument falls flat on its face. Also nice how AES/SPDIF is transformer-coupled in good implementations so you're free from any noisy ground.

Out of curiosity, do you think USB would beat a dedicated transport with AES/SPDIF out? I've yet to experience a case where USB would beat that (or AES/SPDIF in any scenario really), but maybe I need to experience special JCAT card.
Logged

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #156 on: August 18, 2015, 07:40:44 AM »

But most DACs won't clock off the digital inputs but rather use their own interal clocking/PLL to generate the clock. It's asynchronous just like USB. I feel like that argument falls flat on its face. Also nice how AES/SPDIF is transformer-coupled in good implementations so you're free from any noisy ground.

Out of curiosity, do you think USB would beat a dedicated transport with AES/SPDIF out? I've yet to experience a case where USB would beat that (or AES/SPDIF in any scenario really), but maybe I need to experience special JCAT card.

Just tellin' you what I've heard. The USB ground can also be dealt with. The Empirical Shortblock does that, but only if the USB input works without any bus power. The Shortblock is a common mode choke that also severs the Vbus power line. The JCAT makes a HUGE difference, especially if you can power it with a LPS or battery. It has onboard regulation, but it's definitely best if it's not starting with a noisy switch mode PSU.

Whether USB can beat a transport depends on the transport. Can it beat the typical sub $2K CD player? I think so. $5K CD player? Possibly, if you're using either a DAC with a SOTA USB input. Beyond that I don't know.
Logged

Negura

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +22/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #157 on: August 18, 2015, 09:11:04 AM »

Indeed, this is also my finding. There a few ways I heard to noticeably improve USB sound, some stacked or separate:
- SOTM network streamer with LPSU (my preferred, since no PC at all is the best PC from my experience)
- SOTM USB card with LPSU
- using Y-Split USB cable connected to a 5V LPSU. It will clean-up the power line, but this won't help the data line noise, which will get to the DAC.

Other stuff:
- Schiit Wyrd
- SOTM Battery PSU for network streamer
- power the LPSUs with a mains power regen
And a few more I probably forgot.

I am still looking to try a couple of CD transports people recommend here, to hear how they fare. I didn't get any other suggestions beside Theta Data 3 from the other thread. The key is resolution - it has to resolve to even properly compete.
Logged

Thad E Ginathom

  • Politically Incorrect Ex-Hippie
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +25/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 648
  • In the end... cats.
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #158 on: August 18, 2015, 11:04:56 AM »

" LOLLOLOLOLOL" is all Ls and Os! LOL.

I am in in the all 1s and 0s camp, but I hear what you say about USB. With USB, it is not so much the 1s and 0s that bother me, it what might go along with them.
Logged
Cats are nice

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: Alternative transports to USB/PC or 'Spinning a disc'?
« Reply #159 on: August 18, 2015, 03:59:18 PM »

" LOLLOLOLOLOL" is all Ls and Os! LOL.

I am in in the all 1s and 0s camp, but I hear what you say about USB. With USB, it is not so much the 1s and 0s that bother me, it what might go along with them.

Yes, USB would be much better if it wasn't otherwise sending 5V of power along with the data stream. People have reported significant improvements by simply putting a piece of tape to block the power leg pins for DACs that don't need bus power.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20