CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 10:01:21 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 ... 141

Author Topic: The All Purpose Advice Thread  (Read 139949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #530 on: August 26, 2014, 07:15:56 AM »

Bifrost 2 uber is definitely better than the Modi.
I don't like HD800 out of Centrance

Oh man, you couldn't more right.  I had to try to live w/ the HD800 for 4 months out of a DACPort.  Never lasted more than 5 minutes before I ripped them off my head.  Perfect case to study about the claims of basic signal and electrical transparency that is anything but.  Even an O2 has better bass with the HD800 than a DACPort or HifiM8 which is just anemic and thin by comparison unless you use the special coloration switches which exist cuz, u know, transparency. Doh!

DACPort LX is a really good DAC for the price and package though so I don't want to give Michael too hard a time.  Amps are just not his thing IME though I have heard much worse still fwiw.
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

namaiki

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #531 on: August 26, 2014, 01:41:41 PM »

As someone who has a DACport and a HD800 which I rarely use... Any ideas whether either my Leckerton UHA760 or Apex Glacier (or even possibly HRT Headstreamer, or E7) might be more kind to it?

I don't quite have the funds to purchase a proper amp at the moment and frankly I don't really know what the HD800 is supposed to sound like.
Logged

Greed

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +29/-2
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 195
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #532 on: August 26, 2014, 02:48:39 PM »

Just another opinion: On a tight budget and looking for something small and semi-portable the Geek Out has been the best choice IMO. I have the GO450 which works fine with the HD800, but you might want to opt for the 720/1000.

If space and/or portability isn't a concern there are plenty of budget options out there. (i.e Val 2/GO450)
Logged

kothganesh

  • Rebelious Stax Zealot
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +39/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 734
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #533 on: August 26, 2014, 03:46:11 PM »

Just another opinion: On a tight budget and looking for something small and semi-portable the Geek Out has been the best choice IMO. I have the GO450 which works fine with the HD800, but you might want to opt for the 720/1000.

If space and/or portability isn't a concern there are plenty of budget options out there. (i.e Val 2/GO450)

Oh agreed. I have the GO 720 and it works fine with the HD 800. On the small desktops, I would even venture to name the Vali before the Val 2.
Logged

Colgin

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +18/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 138
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #534 on: September 04, 2014, 06:51:07 PM »

Posting in the all-purpose advice thread to get some input/advice on my next headphone purchase.  By way of background, my first decent can was the Grado SR80-i. Now, I basically listen to those only once or twice a year since I think Matthew Sweet's Girlfriend or 100% Fun sound really good on them. But otherwise they sit in the closet. I might use them a little more often except their discomfort is unbearable to me no matter how much I try to stretch the headband. Also, I have become less enchanted with the 60-225 line over the years.

A couple of years ago I bought the AKG Q701. I know this is a divisive can, but I really like it. First, for me it is very comfortable. I have no problem with the bumps. The cups are deep enough that they don't irritate my ears.   And they are one of the few cans that when I wear my glasses are not locked onto my head.  There is enough give that I can move them around a bit. The clamp also doesn't bother my TMJ.  I personally really love the AKG-wide soundstage, whether it is natural or not. I also find the bass very musical, but the lack of impact has become more of an issue for me over time, at least for some types of music. Great can IMO but it has limitations. I also have the V-Moda M-80 for portable and it suits my needs perfectly.

At various meets and audio shows I got to try out Audeze over the past few years and kind of fell for them. Unfortunately it was the LCD-3 and I was hearing them on uber-expensive setups well beyond my price range (or at least what I can justify to myself). But when I have listened to them they have pretty consistently given me a schiit- eating grin.  I figured the LCD-2 would be good enough and I do enjoy it and it is much more affordable, but when I have tried them I get a little less of the aforementioned grin than with the LCD-3.  But I imagine I could be pretty happy with the LCD-2.  Comfort and ergonomics have always concerned me a bit though, not so much due to weight but due to (potential) clamping pressure.

My like for the AKG Q701 but reticence over lack of bass might suggest the HD800 as a possible direction. However, while I respect that phone a lot and have heard many on good setups, I just don't have love for it.  I really cannot say why. Plus, putting together an affordable front-end for them to make them as good as what I have heard would be a challenge from all that I have read. So, the HD-800 is not really on the table for me.

Earlier this summer, I had decided to buy the Oppo PM-2 as soon as it was released. I liked the look, weight and ergonomics of it, as well as the fact that it was really efficient and was claimed to be drivable from a portable. But then with all the talk of different pads here and elsewhere I decided to hold off until there were more impressions. Perhaps like many I was hoping for an Audeze in a more comfortable can that could be driven more easily.  Not really fair to Oppo as they are entitled to have their own sound and not just be an Audeze clone, but I suspect that is what many hoped for (or at least I did).  Also, at the time I was not aware of then forthcoming (now released) HE-560 and HE-400i.  So, I decided to wait and try to hear those.

I have now had the opportunity to hear the latest LCD-2 (Fazor version) and the HE-560 on good setups. I very briefly heard the HE-400i but only out of a portable,not an amp, so not really fair to it. The HE-560 is very compelling. Very comfortable, although I wish the cups were a bit rounder and/or deeper. The inside of the cups sort of touch the outside of my ear. Not really uncomfortable so much as potentially annoying. They generally sounded a little more neutral to me than the LCD-2, but perhaps less "fun". Also, while A/Bing them against the LCD-2 off of the Mcintosh MHA 100 (not perfectly level matched comparison, but close enough to judge the different flavors of t he cans) and going back and forth comparing tracks, I did have a disconcerting moment with the HE-560. After listening to the Beach Boys' "Sloop John B" from Pet Sounds on the Audeze, I went to the HE-560 and adjusted the volume to where they had been sort of level. When I hit play I literally said "Aghh!" out loud and quickly reached for the knob to lower the volume. I had never though of that track as particularly bright, but the glockenspiel at the beginning was just piercing off of that amp at least. Concerns me a bit as to what other music I might find too bright off of the HE-560.  As far as the Audeze, I have never found it too bright with anything. As you all know, the converse is the problem and it can seem a bit dull at times.  Given that I already have a somewhat bright can though, I think that might be OK, particularly because I do really dig the Audeze bass, even on the LCD-2.

As among the planars, I am looking at the HE-560, the LCD-2 and the Oppo PM-2.  I would love to try the Oppos wthout having to go through the hassle of buying and then returning if unsatisfied.  But there does not seem to be an opportunity for that so I would just have to take a risk on them I guess. (One other thing that I like about the Oppo is that they lay flat and store in a small denim case. I am very lazy and, all things being equal, I will get more use out of something that I can grab and setup easily, and I think the Oppo fits that bill better than the others.)

On other days, I wonder if these higher priced cans are worth it to me, or if I would be happy just picking up an HD-600 or HD-650 or the HE-400iand saving some money.  I do really like the HD-600 and it would be somewhat complementary to what I have. But I just worry I would still have that itch for a higher-end can and if so will end up scratching it later; if so, I may as well do it now.

TL; DR:

Looking at higher-end cans: Thoughts on HE-560 v LCD-2 v Oppo PM-2 are appreciated.

May save money and just buy another mid-tier can to add to my collection: HD600 v HD650 v HE-400i.

Also, I am just using a Marantz integrated amp for my AKG Q701 and it is fine for that purpose. I will get a dedicated head-amp if I upgrade though, but I want to decide on the can first and then the amp.

Thanks in advance for any advice.
Logged

shipsupt

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +160/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1687
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #535 on: September 04, 2014, 09:51:56 PM »

HD-600.  They will sound great form the Marantz while you look at amps. 

Logged
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #536 on: September 05, 2014, 12:26:41 AM »

@Colgin:


You are suffering from he problem that all of us have. No easy answer.


The HE-560 is the most finicky, but can also be the most rewarding. Results seem to vary depending upon pads, equipment, and recordings.


HD600 scales like mad once you get better equipment. Complaint is bass quality isn't the greatest. Of course once you get better equipment...


The PM-2 might be a good bet (read Hans and my impressions of it) and pads / mods are easy to implement so you can shape the sound somewhat to your liking. It's probably the least fussy and most consistent from a variety of rigs. I do like the PM-2 quite a bit and its a good choice if you want to stick with simple setups as opposed to the insane setups some of us have.


Maybe even sticking with Q701 and using Parametric digital EQ (if you use computer)?
Logged

Eric_C

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +13/-0
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 230
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #537 on: September 05, 2014, 03:52:27 PM »

HE-560 amping question (might be relevant to Colgin too):
Right now it's Bifrost Uber > Vali > HE-560 with Focus-A pads.

Is Asgard 2 much of an upgrade?
Logged

Colgin

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +18/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 138
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #538 on: September 05, 2014, 06:16:47 PM »

@Colgin:


You are suffering from he problem that all of us have. No easy answer.


The HE-560 is the most finicky, but can also be the most rewarding. Results seem to vary depending upon pads, equipment, and recordings.


HD600 scales like mad once you get better equipment. Complaint is bass quality isn't the greatest. Of course once you get better equipment...


The PM-2 might be a good bet (read Hans and my impressions of it) and pads / mods are easy to implement so you can shape the sound somewhat to your liking. It's probably the least fussy and most consistent from a variety of rigs. I do like the PM-2 quite a bit and its a good choice if you want to stick with simple setups as opposed to the insane setups some of us have.


Maybe even sticking with Q701 and using Parametric digital EQ (if you use computer)?

Thanks for the response.

Like with the HD-800, the "finickiness" of the HE-560 concerns me. Also, I have only heard it sound really good out of high-end amps.  Not to say it wouldn't out of less expensive ones, but I just don't know from personal experience. For example, I think the O2 drives the LCD-2 acceptably, but not gloriously.  I heard the O2 with the HE-560 and was like "bleh", not awful on certain tracks, but just couldn't really drive them properly IMO, particularly on older non-brickwalled tracks. I wonder what the minimum I would need to spend off-the-bat on an amp to even make this a worthwhile purchase.

Cannot do parametric EQ with the AKG unfortunately.  My source is a Sonos system, so while I am streaming files off of my computer (soon to be transferred to a dedicated NAS), I am using the Sonos player which only has useless treble, mid and bass adjustments; you cannot incorporate (to my knowledge) an outside EQ program into the system.  Another alternative though since I like the AKG Q701 but wish it had more bass, is the AKG K712, which is supposed to have a little more bass emphasis. Would love to hear a pair, but I cannot find a local dealer that has them. Heck, even the Harman Kardon alleged "flagship" store here doesn't carry them.

Any love for the LCD-2.  If one is looking at a new LCD-2 (rosewood) versus a PM-2, then there is a substantial price difference that the Audeze would need to justify over the PM-2.  But if you look used (or open box) in the bamboo versus a new PM-2, then there is not too much price differential. While not having great width in the soundstage, the newer Fazor versions of the LCD-2 are good enough for me given the other strong attributes of that phone. If the PM-2 has an even narrower sound stage then I am not sure I would be happy with it at its current price regardless of its other merits. If it is the same or wider then we may have a winner (or it might then be worth it for me to take a chance and just buy a pair with the fallback of the 30-day return policy; although I would not feel good about returning unless I was terribly disappointed).

Can't go wrong with the HD-600 but not sure it will scratch the ortho itch. Although maybe I just pick them up at the current decent price to have a new toy while I wait and listen some more on the more expensive cans. 
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: The All Purpose Advice Thread
« Reply #539 on: September 05, 2014, 06:28:10 PM »

The PM-2 state is certainly narrow. One way to look at the PM-2's stage is that it's realistic or equivalent to a 2 channel speaker setup. Another way to look at it is that it's headphones, and why not go for wider, more open, and spacious?
I would have to say that the LCD-2 does give us that better sense of space - even though the stage not that much wider than PM-2. The LCD-2 is darker sounding though - and that is either a plus or minis depending upon your tastes. But I do believe that the LCD2 will scale a little bit more.
I have a PM-2 loaner from Oppo. I'll ask them I can put this on the Changstar loaner list and put your name on the list if you are interested. Anaxilus currently has them.
Anyways PM2 or LCD2 would be good non-finicky candidates to satisfy your ortho itch.
 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 ... 141