CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 10:55:22 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17

Author Topic: Nonsensical audio terms  (Read 19977 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2013, 05:23:59 AM »

What's a non colored headphone?  A headphone that masks all recordings equally?  There is certainly an aspect to detail retrieval related to driver capability independent of FR bias.  If someone can't tell 128kb from 320kb (assuming a properly dynamic track) that phone/rig is masking and simply not accurate.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2013, 06:30:43 AM »

I know it means something, but not to me: transients.
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2013, 06:54:30 AM »

I know it means something, but not to me: transients.

What are you, a Republican?   :)) ;)


Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

donunus

  • Cheapus Sexus
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +52/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 875
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2013, 07:00:19 AM »

I like the term musical. When i say musical for instance, I just mean that it makes me enjoy the music more than thinking of the details in describing everything analytically.
Logged
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2013, 07:01:22 AM »

I know it means something, but not to me: transients.

What are you, a Republican?   :)) ;)



Conservative, but close enough  :D

No but seriously though, I still haven't read one definition of 'transients' that made me understand it fully.
Logged

shadow_419

  • Guest
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2013, 07:03:57 AM »

I've never cared for the term PRaT.  I have no reason why, it just irks me to no end.
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2013, 07:21:26 AM »

Added.

Prat was a term invented by stereo sales people to make us NOT focus on technicalities such as tonal balance, resolution, distortion, timbral realism, etc., but rather concentrate on the rhythm or beat in order to sell us overpriced stuff that sounded like shit.

I'm serious. As a former graduate of the Don Cheadle  Boogie Nights school of Stereo Salesmen, I shit you not. Some Jedi mind trickery is involved of course.
Logged

AstralStorm

  • Speculation and Speculums
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +250/-164
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 559
  • Warning: causes nearby electronics to go haywire
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2013, 07:26:02 AM »

I know it means something, but not to me: transients.

It's just the same as "attack" - actually a shorthand for "transient sound". Think sharp percussion. Different from "impact", because that apparently applies to bass only.

"PRaT", "Tube sound", "Wire-with-gain" etc. is worthless junk.

However, I'd like to egg Purrin some more with that "nothing", hahaha.
A: It sounds like gain.
(That actually means it doesn't sound like: distortion, coloration, ringing... So, perceptually accurate? No tonality change?)
Logged
For sale: Hifiman HE-500; Paradox; Brainwavz B2. PM me if you would like to buy them.

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2013, 07:30:27 AM »

I know it means something, but not to me: transients.

It's just the same as "attack" - actually a shorthand for "transient sound". Think sharp percussion. Different from "impact", because that apparently applies to bass only.

"PRaT", "Tube sound", "Wire-with-gain" etc. is worthless junk.

However, I'd like to egg Purrin some more with that "nothing", hahaha.
A: It sounds like gain.
(That actually means it doesn't sound like: distortion, coloration, ringing... So, perceptually accurate? No tonality change?)

So basically how responsive or quick the diaphragm is (decay / impulse response)?
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Nonsensical audio terms
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2013, 07:34:38 AM »

Yes. And how clean - without blurring of those transients.

Most transients are pretty dirty tho. They smell bad too.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17