CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:30:58 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9

Author Topic: Here you go, just for you Shike.  (Read 14493 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #20 on: November 04, 2012, 02:09:46 AM »

One of nwavguy's minions.
Logged

Shike

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #21 on: February 03, 2013, 08:19:55 AM »

Searched my username in google for shits and giggles and found this, so dead thread resurrection!

I get under your skin enough that I deserve my own thread?  Awesome.

Let me ask you this:

Have you got past your phobia of dummy heads and upgraded past using sponges on your measurement rig?

Are you still scared to tell people your testing methodologies, which when making a claim is kind of important?

Can you apply the same filters you claim the "other" sites use, like 1/3 octave and -30dB?  Maybe even use headphones they have in their system for comparison to see how off you claim they are?

Have you even found a study to correlate ringing audibility in relation to frequency, amplitude, and perception?  You know, something to actually give context to the graphs?  Or are you instead proposing others find their *own* context to go by, and as such your classification of good/bad is absolutely without reason?

How many here have seen a graph and went "THAT'S TERRIBLE" (or similar) without hands on or said corresponding context?

As for being a "nwavguy" minion - the only thing I own that even begins to relate to him is the O2 which isn't even my primary amp.  My DAC?  A DacMagic connected via toslink.  I don't have the HD650 which he loves as I don't care for it.  I have Pioneer Monitor 10's (original), AKG K702 and K601, ATH-AD700, etc.  I did own a pair of Stax 202 which were laughable sounding far to similar to the K601, without a hint of bass, to warrant keeping them.  I've had hands on with the HD800 which sounded like a better cousin to the K601.  Also tried some Mad Dogz TR50P and HE500's, the Mad Dog sounded too empty in areas, and the HE500 while not bad didn't really sound amazing though did sound better than the Stax.  Ultimately the HD800 sounded the best, but not enough to warrant the asking price IMO.  Would eventually like to try higher end Stax, but finding a place to try them is a PITA.

But yes, by all means I'm a NwAvGuy minion - because I question measurements and their applicability on something he hasn't even discussed once.  :-Z

//will probably get flamed/banned for dare questioning Purrin's absolute word.
Logged

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2013, 08:26:30 AM »

Purrin, do you even have a fucking faraday cage around your house you idiot bastard mother fucker bitch?
Logged

shipsupt

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +160/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1687
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #23 on: February 03, 2013, 08:30:58 AM »

Nope, but you'll get flamed for not posting first in the new members section. 

And it's obvious that you you're not going to fit in anyway with all the assumptions and hyperbole you're tossing around in that post, so save us the trouble and head to for next google hit on your list.

Logged
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Maxvla

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +211/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1251
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #24 on: February 03, 2013, 08:33:25 AM »

Searched my username in google for shits and giggles and found this, so dead thread resurrection!

I get under your skin enough that I deserve my own thread?  Awesome.

//will probably get flamed/banned for dare questioning Purrin's absolute word.

Seem like a good sport, your life may yet be spared!

Quote (selected)
How many here have seen a graph and went "THAT'S TERRIBLE" (or similar) without hands on or said corresponding context?

When I see a bad graph, I think 'that's terrible, but I will still listen to it at least once to confirm'. What's the phrase? Trust but verify?
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #25 on: February 03, 2013, 08:36:29 AM »

Have you ever asked a question that wasn't indicative of your intellectual disability?  My turds are brighter than you, now go  walk the plank .

Edit - If you ever learn to read, three things would happen:

1-You'd be able to answer your own stupid questions.
2-You'd stop mischaracterizing everything people say that you don't agree with and shifting arguments.
3-You'd go somewhere where you were welcome.  Perhaps an institute that measures coat hangers and hands out Quaaludes.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

ultrabike

  • Burritous Supremus (and Mexican Ewok)
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +4226/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2384
  • I consider myself "normal"
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #26 on: February 03, 2013, 08:42:42 AM »

How many here have seen a graph and went "THAT'S TERRIBLE" (or similar) without hands on or said corresponding context?

I feel characterization is important, but there are a couple of things that a frequency response plots and CSD won't tell you. Part of the remaining story (but not all) may be found in non-linear behavior characterization plots such as THD, IMD, and HF. Also note that one of the main points of this thread is that plots can be tweaked to mislead: x-y scales, smoothing, windowing... Finding the right parameters seems to involve listening.

Even with all these plots, there are perceptions of pitch that a well carried out characterization won't tell you. In other words dummy heads will not tell you the whole story, and I think you know that...

Anyway, the deal here is to get along... Otherwise what's the point?
« Last Edit: February 03, 2013, 08:58:26 AM by ultrabike »
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #27 on: February 03, 2013, 08:52:08 AM »

Btw, where's your girlfriend NWAVass?  Ran for the hills after shilling his own products hiding from the liable lawsuits?  A little basic arithmetic is all it took to build an army of the blind charging the walls of Jerusalem waving the banner of Objectivity.  How's it feel to be part of audio's Children's Crusade?   
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

firev1

  • Cynophobic Puss
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +52/-0
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 490
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #28 on: February 03, 2013, 08:53:43 AM »

Have you ever asked a question that wasn't indicative of your intellectual disability?  My turds are brighter than you, now go  walk the plank .

Edit - If you ever learn to read, three things would happen:

1-You'd be able to answer your own stupid questions.
2-You'd stop mischaracterizing everything people say that you don't agree with and shifting arguments.
3-You'd go somewhere where you were welcome.  Perhaps an institute that measures coat hangers and hands out Quaaludes.

HAHA agreed, it barely takes 30 secs to search up GE's measurements and compare their data against purrin's, which I have found out after a while, were pretty damn useless.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2013, 10:00:21 AM by firev1 »
Logged
Time spent on enjoyment is not time wasted. - someone

Shike

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
Re: Here you go, just for you Shike.
« Reply #29 on: February 03, 2013, 09:05:44 AM »

How many here have seen a graph and went "THAT'S TERRIBLE" (or similar) without hands on or said corresponding context?

There are a couple of things that a frequency response plots and CSD won't tell you. Part of the remaining story may be found in non-linear behavior characterization plots such as THD, IMD, and HF. But even then, there are perceptions of pitch that full on characterization won't tell you. Dummy heads will not tell you the whole story, and I think you know that...

Of course they don't tell everything.  However, the whole thread was made because I questioned the validity of his testing in practice and noted other sites with what I consider better testing equipment (and transparent testing methodologies) had generally less ringing even if they were smoothed in comparison.

Quote (selected)
Anyway, the deal here is to get along... Otherwise what's the point?

Ask Purrin and Anax, I apparently must have really thrown him in a tissy to make this thread.

Quote from: anax
Edit - If you ever learn to read, three things would happen:

1-You'd be able to answer your own stupid questions.
2-You'd stop mischaracterizing everything people say that you don't agree with and shifting arguments.
3-You'd go somewhere where you were welcome.  Perhaps an institute that measures coat hangers and hands out Quaaludes.
Btw, where's your girlfriend NWAVass?  Ran for the hills after shilling his own products hiding from the liable lawsuits?  A little basic arithmetic is all it took to build an army of the blind charging the walls of Jerusalem waving the banner of Objectivity.  How's it feel to be part of audio's Children's Crusade?[/quote]

Rhetorical questions sparky.

As for shilling - that word doesn't mean what you think it means.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9