CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:09:25 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13

Author Topic: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs  (Read 21630 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2012, 09:24:44 AM »

Hooooooly shit! This is amateur hour stuff.

I get that R&D costs a lot, and small companies can't produce the volume to afford as big of a hit to their cut as larger companies, but come on: $5k for something that looks like it was assembled by a kid in junior high shop class?

First off, I can't shake the feeling some guy was browsing through the generic template catalog of a woodworker he looked up in the phonebook and came across the spiderweb design. "Well, this looks kinda cool."

A year ago I would have been all over this thing *because* of how ridiculous and amateurish it was. In a way, I can still feel the pull of temptation. The fact that they're trying to directly take on what amounts to the world's most precision engineered headphone (SR-009) is admirable in its own way. Sort of like the little underpowered guy in anime who takes on a top tier villain just on principle. Only this time it involves peoples' money, and for every TakeT H2+ out there you've got a Muramasa VIII.
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.

dBel84

  • Ortho Ninja
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +86/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 341
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2012, 04:17:18 PM »

Trying to stay neutral and open minded is going to kill me but I hate to judge aesthetics and finish on a prototype. I recall the first Audeze protos' in 2009 - people calling alien antennae to mind. For lack of better description , that headband is ruggedly simple. They have several sizes of bands, not sure how this will play out but possibly selecting the headband for your head ?? I spoke with Eric's son and he indicated that they were working on some mechanism for strain relief. He also admitted to me that the units at the show had been assembled 1-2 days before the show as there was a delay in anodizing etc. The back plate will be "adjustable" "tunable" by the end user - several different types of wood and some form of transparent mesh. They apparently sound best with no backing at all but the risk to the driver is ever present. Only one layer in final production, double layer was to protect driver mishaps at the show in case someone was a little overzealous.

RD - they are unipolar and I did ask why the magnet on the front rather than the back and this is something they evaluated in prototyping and the rear magnet caused too much coloration relative to the magnet in front. I can only imaging that the front window acts like some sort of polarising lens.

I think I mentioned this on HF  - most everything is made in house. Material is said to be very thin - no specs , overall driver is extremely light and mostly air damped. The back pressure from the frame does help in this regard. Magnets are not off the shelf but custom made for "front back" polarity instead of side to side. The screws used are some non magnetic material to prevent inadvertent driver accidents and tools need to be titanium or hardened plastic.

Fit - the first pair I tried was a little loose and there was airleakage at the bottom of my ears , second pair were a good fit and more comfortable than I thought they were going to be.

Sound - there was something that I couldn't place with the voicing and it finally occured to me last night. They sound like horn loaded speakers do  - especially with respect to the mid and upper frequencies. And I am talking BIG horns or like the plasma tweeters I have heard.

gotta board my flight, more rambling latter 
..dB

Logged

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2012, 04:38:39 PM »

Don't get me wrong: I'm FULLY open to the idea that small companies assemble stuff that isn't as "finished" as larger ones often times, and that prototypes especially are rough. Forget the LCD-2. I've got the LCD-1 which came in a ziplock bag. LOL. Then there's the TakeT H2+ which is one of the most awkward headphones ergonomically ever devised. These things can actually make a product endearing to me.

BUT. And this is a huge but: this is a product that costs $5,000.

It's going right up against the SR-009. Now, I realize more than anyone that different products serve different needs, and that our priorities themselves differ. I was just defending the Muramasa VIII, which cost upwards of $7,000, when it was first announced on head-fi. People were claiming it was ridiculous. And they were right. But I asserted that it was also something of a sculpture, an art piece that had a functional dimension.

And you know what? I feel burnt out these days. Having paid upwards of $7,000 for the Muramasa VIII, I can't help but feel a little taken advantage of, a little worn out and jaded. And we're talking about a product that, despite its many flaws, still had a lot of care and attention to detail.

These are prototypes, sure, but what I'm seeing (and hearing from people) is not boding well. Again: this is only really an issue BECAUSE they're asking so much for them. These are going to be the most expensive orthodynamic headphones ever made up until this point. You're going to have to bring something really, really big to the table, or you're going to have to expect to get reamed. I mean, I'm hearing from people they sound no better than vintage orthos, and I'm seeing that these guys can't even put in screws without getting the wood to crack around it.

I just can't help but think of my Muramasa VIII with its headphone stand bent at a 45 degree angle and its cracked display box.

This shit just doesn't fly when you get to this price point. Frankly, I'm sick of it. Now I'm fully willing to give JPS a chance! However they're going to have to do a hell of a lot, and *so far* I'm not seeing it.
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.

Tari

  • Poet Laureate of Changstaria
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +245/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 854
  • Is tari a wizard
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2012, 04:58:18 PM »

Remember, those vintage orthos were Don's modded yammies, and are quite good.


Don, if the case is that they're doing most everything in house, I understand that they have higher production costs than some other established companies with pre-existing infrastructure.


But here's where they're wrong - you don't immediately transfer that cost to potential customers and build it into the price to fully offset the costs you've incurred.  You make a first product that's darn good for a price that consumers just can't help but try it.  (Especially in this case, when the company has plenty of pure profit revenue from their cables) you make back the costs after a couple fairly priced models that also entrench you as a company with good products and decent prices. Going straight to statement, let alone one with an unheard of price (for a company that has not been in the market!) reeks of opportunism, taking advantage of a market they consider "ripe for the picking."


I'm all for the proliferation of orthos.  But market trends are a real thing and if the negative trends aren't halted in their muddy tracks by an informed public, the headphone market will look very bleak indeed.


I recently had a chat with a friend of mine who collects for charitable institutions.  I asked him how he knows how much to ask for from any given prospective donor - he said "you push until you find resistance."  Then you know the limit and can do all your planning with a working knowledge of X amount being roughly the limit.


I see the headphone market working this way - sure, there was a hue and cry raised over some recent flagships, but people still bought them.  That won't dissuade these companies from continuing to release at even greater price points in the future.  The only thing that will spell out "line of demarcation" to these companies is a flat-out lack of sales. 
Logged

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2012, 07:04:54 PM »

There is still a market for lower priced headphones with good sound quality.  A huge market.  Look at the M50's success.  Usually we think if there's a market for something, someone will see that and jump on the opportunity.  And there is a huge opportunity right now.  I wish I could get in on it.  But there seems to be a laziness, and a marketing oriented philosophy that these companies are falling into led by the BEATS success, so I'm not sure their companies are even setup to be very innovative or realize the existence of this potential market. 

It's kind of a classic pattern as old companies are taken over by business men rather than the innovators that started them.  AKG is a shining example of this. 

I do think that small companies like Audeze are a shock to companies like Sennheiser.  So that may put the pressure on for innovation.  I think bigger companies are the only ones who would be able to offer cheaper products because you have to sell volume to make that possible.  Without a well thought out business model like Schitt has, Audeze couldn't make 300 dollar orthos.  Maybe Jason can chime in though... I could be wrong

So I think the avenue for better, cheaper phones probably comes from companies like Audeze shaking up the market and attracting a lot of attention and competition, and then someone like Sennheiser coming in and using their money to do something better for cheaper. 

Maybe Jason could chime in here, I'm sure he'd have some insights. 
Logged

Tari

  • Poet Laureate of Changstaria
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +245/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 854
  • Is tari a wizard
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2012, 07:23:19 PM »

Mass production means custom injection molds, unless you plan on going with an off-the-shelf OEM design and just sorting out the drivers.  Those molds are seriously expensive, and not prudent for companies like Audeze until they're selling major volume (with household name recognition, large dealer networks, etc)


Assuming they are having everything done to spec to meet their own requirements, (and therefore don't want to go OEM) I'm not sure that they could get a good headphone below say $650 with a healthy profit margin in the near future.  A few years from now though might be a different story.


Either way, there's a huge difference between Audeze charging... $450 for LCD-1's, $650 for the first couple months of the LCD-2, etc - only now charging a more questionable price on the LCD-3 and JPS just plopping down and saying "OK guys, ortho, cables, lambskin, $5,000." 


Audeze was pushed into the market by ortho fans.  JPS is trying to push into the market.  Except they're going about it completely the wrong way and a way that will ultimately hurt the hobby.
Logged

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2012, 07:25:33 PM »

Either way, there's a huge difference between Audeze charging... $450 for LCD-1's, $650 for the first couple months of the LCD-2, etc - only now charging a more questionable price on the LCD-3 and JPS just plopping down and saying "OK guys, ortho, cables, lambskin, $5,000." 

Yeah, exactly.
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.

dBel84

  • Ortho Ninja
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +86/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 341
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2012, 07:32:25 PM »

Yep . Please don't read into my comments as being supportive of the the anticipated cost. I am still reeling. I know well what it costs and in this headphone world, most small manufacturers hardly break even let alone maintain an overhead to grow. This is because the community has essentially dismissed the industry predicted 5x price point to ensure market growth. This is unlike the speaker world where 20k premps are aplenty and I can assure you that there is not even 4k worth of electronics in something like that. And yes, trying to recoup R&D in the first run is not a practical business IMO


Just limiting my comment to the driver - it is quite an achievement

I understand that we all hear differently etc and that the subtleties is where things change as you climb the fidelity ladder. The detail retrieval of these drivers is impressive. The fact that they are flapping free in the air speaks volumes to my ortho side. What it tells me is that it can be done.

On a different note, inside scoop is that 2 more companies are entering the fray. ( I didn't just say that ;) )

..dB

Logged

Tari

  • Poet Laureate of Changstaria
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +245/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 854
  • Is tari a wizard
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2012, 07:49:40 PM »

Luckily a company like JPS has plenty of what I would call "pure profit" items (little-to-no R&D or production costs compared to RP) to support this (though I don't know their finances)- so if they really wanted to break into the market they could use that money to defray startup costs and sell the headphones more reasonably rather than relying on the price of the product itself to pay for production.


My main concern is all the junk in the "mainstream" audiophile market trickling into the "growth" headphone market- perhaps I'm just an idealist but I don't consider it inevitable if steps are taken to prevent it.
Logged

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: Abyss planar headphones by JPS Labs
« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2012, 07:50:48 PM »

I had a dream a few months ago where Fostex announced the TH1000, their new flagship which just happened to be an ortho. Then Yamaha decided to get back into the game and become rivals again, released a YH-2000.
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13