CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 12:09:47 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11

Author Topic: The SchiitShow / Mr.SpeakersShow @ MdR, Saturday, Aug 15,2015 IMPRESSIONS  (Read 9961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jexby

  • Prays to the Porcelain God with His Mouth Closed
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +26/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201

  • I know a lot of people like the Lyr 2 because of its bass, warmth, and slam and I totally respect this view. However, the SSTs actually make the Lyr 2 more neutral sounding. The SSTs tighten up the Lyr 2's sound, provide a better transient response, a faster sound with more delineated lines and articulation. This is my personal preference, and to me (again, borrowing words from someone else), the Lyr was always meant to have SSTs. My view is that the tubes for in Lyr 2 don't actually do anything other than offer more bass and more slam. The Lyr 2 isn't as technically capable of as the Mjolnir 2, so the good things that tubes normally bring to the table (non-mist clarity, resolution, microdynamics) isn't as evident. So in this case, I'll take more control and more precision rather than more warmth and slam.

Marv,

to offer (or repeat) a bit of a counter point:  at the CCCP Boulder meet, it seemed that a majority of us "preferred" the Lyr2 with real tubes over the LISST in that  real tubes provided a wider soundstage, more air in space and better instrument separation.
that was all evident to me after about 10 minutes of back and forth.

so, not all Lyr2 lovers are in it for the bass, warmth and slam.  but (also) for the reasons above.

of course, this was with NOS Ediswan CV2492 tubes.  which are significantly better than stock tubes.
and some presentation likely could have been improved further with other NOS Philips SQ or Telefunken or Siemens CCa tubes.
but at the CCCP meet we kept it to a simpler "fair fight".   :)p17

all that being said, I'm dying to hear a Mjol2 with my NOS Siemens CCa.  yet seems way overkill for a work office set up.
luckily all my $ went to the Black Widow, so that Mjol2 is going to wait awhile.....
Logged

Eric_C

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +13/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 230

Would love to hear about Mjol 2 vs Black Widow
Logged

jexby

  • Prays to the Porcelain God with His Mouth Closed
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +26/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201

Would love to hear about Mjol 2 vs Black Widow

me too!
buy me a Mjol 2 and I'll satisfy your curiosity.
 :)p13

Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current

Yeah, I'm talking about whatever stock tubes are with the Lyr these days. I'm sort of making the assumption that most people who buy the Lyr wouldn't effectively double the price of the amp by trying and testing a huge combination of tubes. I hate tube rolling more than most people would think.*

Not disagreeing that tubes in the Lyr don't bring out some of these positive qualities, but more like they don't bring enough of them to offset the bassy warmth (with real tubes) of the Lyr, which is excessive for my taste.


* After all, who do you think wrote what's below on the EC website FAQ?

Q: What do you think of the bulbous wolf-[redickted] shaped Le Fevre XTC1983 tube from 1919?
A: We recommend going to www.changstar.com or www.head-fi.org for tube advice. Tubes are a very personal choice.


I believe the answer in an earlier draft was something along the lines of "How the fuck should we know?" Judi nixed that line.
Logged

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw

Anyways, a few notes on the Lyr with LISST and Mojo 2 with LISST as I promised I would follow up. BTW, I believe Anaxilus and OJ may be doing a write-up on this event for Tyll, so be sure to check Inner Fidelity in the next few days.

In a nutshell, I prefer the Mjolnir 2 with tubes and the Lyr 2 with the SSTs. I'll keep this short as usual:
  • Tubes (real) take the Mjolnir 2 to the next level. While the real tubes shift the tonal balance to "more fun" relative to the SSTs, i.e. more bass and more present mid-treble, tubes really do liven up and increase the "technicalities" of the Mjolnir: more resolving, increased macro dynamics, more gradations of small volume contrasts, and more open. In essence, more engaging, the sort of engaging that makes you NOT want to put the headphones down. In my opinion (and these words are borrowed from someone else), the Mjolnir was always meant to have tubes. I wouldn't worry about the "treble" comment. It's relative to the SSTs and it's not edgy (we are talking about tubes after all), and it doesn't preclude the use of HD800s. The tonal balance comments do need to be tempered by the fact that I don't know what tubes were used. There is a huge selection of tubes what will work, and I know you can get all sorts of different tunings with the 6922s. Finally, I'll say this again: Lyr or Vali fans would very well served by upgrading to the Mjolnir 2. [I'm actually very tempted to pick one up for myself]
  • I know a lot of people like the Lyr 2 because of its bass, warmth, and slam and I totally respect this view. However, the SSTs actually make the Lyr 2 more neutral sounding. The SSTs tighten up the Lyr 2's sound, provide a better transient response, a faster sound with more delineated lines and articulation. This is my personal preference, and to me (again, borrowing words from someone else), the Lyr was always meant to have SSTs. My view is that the tubes for in Lyr 2 don't actually do anything other than offer more bass and more slam. The Lyr 2 isn't as technically capable of as the Mjolnir 2, so the good things that tubes normally bring to the table (non-mist clarity, resolution, microdynamics) isn't as evident. So in this case, I'll take more control and more precision rather than more warmth and slam.
Hope that makes sense and doesn't make anyone mad. In the end, we all have more choice.

I agree with this. I prefer the Lyr2 with SSTs and Mjolnir with tubes. Though I have to say I've heard the Lyr2 sound better with the HD800 than what I heard at the show. It made me wonder what the tubes were in the Lyr2 or if they were going bad. It sounded just a bit off from what I remember.
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

Alaarx

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Powder Monkey
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +2/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22

As someone who listens purely with HD800s and adores the air and spaciousness that they provide - I'm interested in how the Mojo2 with tubes sounds compared to the Black Widow for those headphones. I'm not really interested in which absolutely sounds better (and I'm sure marvey wouldn't comment on that) just what different qualities they bring to the table. At the moment I'm in the list for a BW but secretly yearn for a Studio Jr. whenever that may arise. The Mojo may be a good interim investment while i wait.
Logged

Eric_C

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +13/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 230

...I'm interested in how the Mojo2 with tubes sounds compared to the Black Widow for those headphones.
THIS. PLZ.

me too!
buy me a Mjol 2 and I'll satisfy your curiosity.
 :)p13


That sounds like an excellent deal. In fairness you should ship me your BW for free.
Logged

jwahl

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +2/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18

As someone who listens purely with HD800s and adores the air and spaciousness that they provide - I'm interested in how the Mojo2 with tubes sounds compared to the Black Widow for those headphones. I'm not really interested in which absolutely sounds better (and I'm sure marvey wouldn't comment on that) just what different qualities they bring to the table. At the moment I'm in the list for a BW but secretly yearn for a Studio Jr. whenever that may arise. The Mojo may be a good interim investment while i wait.

Also agreed.  I think I'm still going to wait for the Yggy over the MB Gungnir but the Mjolnir 2 with good tubes does sound like an interesting proposition, as opposed to the BW.  Might fix some of the nitpicks I had with the original MJ and HD800.
Logged

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245

Haven't done direct comparison obviously, but BW is a lot smoother and therein a better match for HD800. Mojo2 still has that hyper-dynamic, kinda spitty attack that can be startling and fatiguing.
Logged

audiofrk

  • Won't beg for stuff if he hates you
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +30/-13
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 398

Haven't done direct comparison obviously, but BW is a lot smoother and therein a better match for HD800. Mojo2 still has that hyper-dynamic, kinda spitty attack that can be startling and fatiguing.

I actually liked that it worked well for orthos, but I can see how that would suck for dynamics
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11