CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 10:51:13 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Who shouldn't be trusted?

Steve Guttenberg @ CNET
- 94 (11.6%)
Mike Mercer
- 91 (11.2%)
Mike Fremer @ Stereophile
- 32 (3.9%)
Headphonia.com
- 66 (8.1%)
What Hi-Fi?
- 58 (7.2%)
24bit / Michael Piskor @ Headfonics.com
- 38 (4.7%)
John Grandberg / Project86 @ Head-Fi.com
- 28 (3.5%)
hifiguy528 @ Head-Fi.com
- 64 (7.9%)
Macedonian Hero @ Head -Fi.com
- 48 (5.9%)
Srajan Ebaen @ SixMoons.com
- 72 (8.9%)
Skylab @ Head-Fi.com
- 31 (3.8%)
Chris Connaker @ ComputerAudiophile.com
- 30 (3.7%)
Jude Mansilla @Head-Fi.com
- 116 (14.3%)
Michael Lavorgna (late add - redo vote if you want to add)
- 24 (3%)
TAS / Robert Harley (late add - redo vote if you want to add)
- 19 (2.3%)

Total Members Voted: 162

Voting closes: March 28, 2018, 05:02:01 PM


Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21

Author Topic: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers  (Read 15404 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

adamaley

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +7/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 41
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #190 on: August 25, 2015, 12:27:55 PM »

Mike Mercer is the worst for me. Never misses an opportunity to name call his "mentor" who recently passed (RIP) as if that in any way legitimizes his spurious jizz-markie approach to everything he gets his hands on. Terrible command of the English language (when did that stop being a requirement for people who choose to write for publications?), always catering to the vendor, and his ridiculous love for everything Audez'e regardless of how terrible it is, does himself and his employers a great disservice.
Logged

ohm-image

  • Headfonia Paparazzo
  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +12/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #191 on: August 26, 2015, 12:47:02 AM »

BTW, is that Headfonia.com or Headphonia.com? If the first, I apologise for any part I've played in garnering mistrust in the last year (I joined in 2014 February or January).
Logged

knerian

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +26/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 328
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #192 on: August 26, 2015, 12:50:14 AM »

Mike Mercer is the worst for me. Never misses an opportunity to name call his "mentor" who recently passed (RIP) as if that in any way legitimizes his spurious jizz-markie approach to everything he gets his hands on. Terrible command of the English language (when did that stop being a requirement for people who choose to write for publications?), always catering to the vendor, and his ridiculous love for everything Audez'e regardless of how terrible it is, does himself and his employers a great disservice.

Who is his mentor?
Logged

jexby

  • Prays to the Porcelain God with His Mouth Closed
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +26/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #193 on: August 26, 2015, 02:52:04 AM »

Mike Mercer is the worst for me. Never misses an opportunity to name call his "mentor" who recently passed (RIP) as if that in any way legitimizes his spurious jizz-markie approach to everything he gets his hands on. Terrible command of the English language (when did that stop being a requirement for people who choose to write for publications?), always catering to the vendor, and his ridiculous love for everything Audez'e regardless of how terrible it is, does himself and his employers a great disservice.

+1

It's as if he's completely addicted to a new device or Audeze headphone that gives him that "special tingle".
Or he's completely high all the time when writing or listening.

For example- he raved about the GeekOut 1000 before release, mostly justified as it was a couple years ago.
But then IIRC, he went right back to regularly using some DragonFly or MicroStreamer instead?

Anyone who raves about the EL8 open or closed is bonkers.

Logged

Deep Funk

  • Sure is fond of ellipses...
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +111/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2344
  • Born in 1988, eclectic 90-ties!
    • Radjahs2cents
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #194 on: August 26, 2015, 06:13:39 AM »

I hope it is second nature for you to avoid reviews that start or are based on the "new-toy-syndrome"?
Logged
Few things keep me sane: my loved ones, my music and my hobbies. Few is almost an understatement here...

Pyruvate

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +6/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #195 on: August 26, 2015, 06:27:42 AM »

Reading Nomax and Music Alchemist in the HF Diana thread gave me a huge headache

Posters like Music Alchemist are the worst. I cringe every time he posts. He's one of the top posters on HF simply because he's on the site all day long. What rustles my jimmies the most is the kind of advice he gives to newbies. He spends at most a week with his headphones before trading them and thinks he knows what's best for everyone with his limited experiences.
Logged

Griffon

  • Foppish Cat
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +17/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 152
  • Meow!
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #196 on: August 26, 2015, 10:27:17 PM »

Posters like Music Alchemist are the worst. I cringe every time he posts. He's one of the top posters on HF simply because he's on the site all day long. What rustles my jimmies the most is the kind of advice he gives to newbies. He spends at most a week with his headphones before trading them and thinks he knows what's best for everyone with his limited experiences.

I think a somehow seasoned noob can actually tell MA (and those people alike) are the kind of hyping spammer. Meanwhile, there are some people far more dangerous - they talk incompetent tech (like the iFi drama yesterday), falisfied data (Jude's FRs) and pseudo-science (cable directions, specific burn-in).
Logged
Meow!

sfoclt

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +8/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 88
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #197 on: August 26, 2015, 10:52:28 PM »

I hope it is second nature for you to avoid reviews that start or are based on the "new-toy-syndrome"?

Yeah, I'd much rather read a review from a competent hobbyist (or professional) that has spent several years with an item than the fotm reviews from those chasing free gear and attention, often making sure to drop announcements of their upcoming reviews on the forums.  Who are you again?
Logged

Deep Funk

  • Sure is fond of ellipses...
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +111/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2344
  • Born in 1988, eclectic 90-ties!
    • Radjahs2cents
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #198 on: August 27, 2015, 06:08:12 AM »

Yeah, I'd much rather read a review from a competent hobbyist (or professional) that has spent several years with an item than the fotm reviews from those chasing free gear and attention, often making sure to drop announcements of their upcoming reviews on the forums.  Who are you again?

Someone who escaped Hype-Fi due to the hype factory. I trust personal recommendations.

Pleased to meet you.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2015, 06:26:06 AM by Deep Funk »
Logged
Few things keep me sane: my loved ones, my music and my hobbies. Few is almost an understatement here...

Dr Pan K

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +22/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 112
  • it's a dirty job..
Re: Reviewing the audiophile reviewers
« Reply #199 on: August 27, 2015, 07:28:34 AM »

Who is his mentor?

Harry Pearson, founder of TAS.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21