I know its not fair to compare but are full-range's generally 'faster' than the Seas coax? I would love to go active anytime but I have no expertise on building speakers so hopefully will learn with time.
Quote from: firev1 on March 04, 2013, 05:17:31 PMI know its not fair to compare but are full-range's generally 'faster' than the Seas coax? I would love to go active anytime but I have no expertise on building speakers so hopefully will learn with time.I would not categorize the Seas as "fast". Low efficiency designs never are. It's all about compromise. I'll say much more later when I get back home about pluses and minuses. Even active has minuses. The Fostex is almost stat fast. But with much more impact and punch.
Something about low efficiency designs I've heard (< 90 db/w) don't really lend themselves to low volume listening. Like I've felt the need to turn them up, don't know if it's from lack of resolution or what, but it could be the speed thing.
aaah but it is easier to power headphones with "megawatt" equivalents to overcome this petty deficiency , I know my alternative is to heft that hernia maker up the stairs ( once it is fixed ) and just be done. real watts in speaker land are not cheap
I have been very curious about the Fostex BK-16 for quite a while. It is a very decently price kit, and very well regarded. I'm even more curious now. I'm holding back quite a bit for several reasons, but those Fostex BK-16 seem like pure win. Sorry if my questions are too noobish but do these through a narrow sweet spot? paired with a sub (and perhaps super tweeters) would there be any problems in using these for home theater applications (perhaps 4 channel)?