Thanks a ton for this list. I seem to recall an earlier version on HF if I'm not mistaken. Moron swabbie question: Do you feel the Rag is a relatively safe blind purchase? I have serious reservations on plunging on a TOTL tube amp without listening to a bunch of them first. The price point of the Rag, and the lack of tube expenses seems comparatively safe, even if one wanted to move in the tube direction in the future.I tried out the Valhalla 2 vs. my current WA7/tube psu combo, and ended up returning the Valhalla due to the soundstage being comparatively compressed, and inferior resolution. Overall tonality of the Val2 was very good (a bit better than the fully upgraded WA7 IMO), but it didn't quite have the technicalities I was looking for. Note that this was comparing the stock Val2 to the Woo with dialed in tubes - not fair. Regardless, the WA7 combo (even with upgraded tubes) still lacks balls, so it needs to go...soon.
Rag is the safest blind purchase I can think of on it's own merits. However, it's not safe if you have any weirdness or issues upstream from your sources. It will spotlight whatever is wrong upstream assuming you have capable enough headphones or speakers.Rag soundstage is wide but not very deep or layered. To my ears, that flat SS is it's biggest weakness.
Quote from: Anaxilus on October 08, 2014, 11:00:25 PMRag is the safest blind purchase I can think of on it's own merits. However, it's not safe if you have any weirdness or issues upstream from your sources. It will spotlight whatever is wrong upstream assuming you have capable enough headphones or speakers.Rag soundstage is wide but not very deep or layered. To my ears, that flat SS is it's biggest weakness.Cool. Sounds promising, the layering is definitely a concern, though I can't imagine that an upgraded WA7 is stellar in this aspect either (it was considerably better than the stock Val2). Still, a flat presentation would be a deal breaker. The ability to drive orthos appeals to me as well, in regards to the Rag.Anyhow, I wish I would have had a bit more sense when I bought the WA7, but I guess everyone has to start somewhere. Life will move on.
Anyhow, I wish I would have had a bit more sense when I bought the WA7, but I guess everyone has to start somewhere. Life will move on.
Cool. Sounds promising, the layering is definitely a concern, though I can't imagine that an upgraded WA7 is stellar in this aspect either (it was considerably better than the stock Val2). Still, a flat presentation would be a deal breaker. The ability to drive orthos appeals to me as well, in regards to the Rag.Anyhow, I wish I would have had a bit more sense when I bought the WA7, but I guess everyone has to start somewhere. Life will move on.
The great thing about tubes is that you can pick tubes to get a good result - say with HD800. I have not heard the power supply w/ WA7. WA7 was not impressive without it, but people I to trust say it's much better with it. With the Rag, it becomes DAC rolling, and thats more difficult to do than tube rolling. Generally if you have a smooth DAC, the Rag will yield great results with HD800.Also the Rag doesn't have the mid-bass slam a lot of the big tube amps have here, but it does have the most heft in the sub / low bass I've heard. At least top two or three.
he heard it through the M7 DAC which isn't all that deep or layered compared to other DACs stronger in that dept.