Are studio monitors just a bad idea for small living rooms / bedrooms? I just listened to some Genelecs that were 1k - 1.2k USD, and they sounded really great, plus they're puny and self-powered.
I checked out all the Sony staff after someone I respect rated them highly. AR1 has decent FR but is soulless, or lifeless,
I don't know if it's heresy here, but is the book, "Introduction Guide to High-Performance Audio Systems" by Robert Harley a good reference source?
Don't all TOTL speakers measure superbly via KLIPPEL and other measuring metrics? If so, why do they end up so strident? Is it the music they're playing? I want to hear some of these systems play tracks that don't have limiting compression to the nines, and play at reasonable ~75 dB volumes.
Well, there are two components in my system that I can't see ever going away - the Sjostrom QRV-08 headamp and the KEF LS50 speakers. Just about everyone has been rabidly spewing out 5 star reviews about these speakers and this is one the rare cases where it might be justified.
As for studio monitors - be careful. They can have a signature that causes hearing fatigue. Also some monitors have a bad tendency to sound good only when playing really loud.
If I ever wanted to get serious with a speaker setup, I'd get a pair of ATC near/mid-field active monitors, a decent DAC/preamp/monitor-controller, some Mogamis, a decent bespoke meter-bridge/desk (to route all cabling cos I hate clutter) and call it a day. The few production/mastering/mixing studios I've visited seriously shat all over most of the ultra-fi audiophile showrooms I've been to.
Many of the Gearslutz people recommend to not even think about the speaker budget until the treatment budget is spent. Something I'd love to do, if I ever have a listening room. For some reason it is anathema to some audiophiles who don't believe in anything other than boxes, cables and ears.