This one also has the gigantic spike, perhaps similar to the first one.
Allow me to slot in my impressions:Roxanne (Universal) vs JH13Pro (Demo):Roxanne has this kinda weird hi-sound, like for eg. the hi-hat sounds too splashy compared to JH13Pro, which is to me an alright quantity. The bass is weird too, like felt smaller sounding yet not so tight. The stage has somehow widened because every instrument sounds "smaller" to my ears. 13 sounds rather clean and every instrument is clearly in place. Even the vocals have good breathing sound which i like very much.The store advertised it as the Rock star IEM. I guess YMMV.
I heard the bolded parts opposite from you for some reason. Hi-hats come off less splashy in the universal Roxanne than the JH13FP demo, while the Roxanne at bass minimum still has more quantity than the JH13.
This one also has the gigantic spike, perhaps similar to the first one
I posted that graph on head-fi.
Quote from: slim8452 on August 28, 2014, 08:33:21 AMI posted that graph on head-fi.Hi, nice of you to join in the conversation!I have a question about why you guys test THD @1 mW? Wouldn't it be more useful to set the output volume at 85 and 100 dB(A) and measure the distortion that way? 85 dB(A) is the recommended maximum listening volume over an 8 hour workday according to OSHA/NIOSH (and almost all international metrics on noise exposure), while 100 dBA is usually thought to be "very loud". Usually, depending on the headroom they have, the input sensitivities of IEMs, such as multi-BA IEMs, usually are over 110 dB/mW, meaning that the distortion profiles shown are well over acceptable drive volumes (and therefore not useful for responsible listeners, not saying anything about stupid teenagers that voluntarily want to go deaf).