Afternoon Pirates!
Context: Since October I’ve been on the hunt for a decent pair of all-purpose, closed back phones. (I’m not going to bore you all with the long details, but if you’re interested click this link
http://www.head-fi.org/products/focal-spirit-professional/reviews/10488.) I thought I had hit the end of my hunt with the Focal Spirit Professionals. They sound great and my ears fit inside their undersized pads. After two weeks of use though, I’ve run into an issue: while their memory foam pads have softened, the clamping force on the headphones remains rather high. The lower end of the pads presses right on my temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and has restarted some old problems that I had with that spot: popping, clicking, crackling, and general pain and discomfort. I’ve stopped wearing them for the past few days and the TMJ problems have almost entirely subsided.
So, now I’m back to using the M-100’s with XL pads because they don’t cause me physical pain. The downsize to this is that everything sounds like its being played out an 80’s Monte Carlo SS with hydraulics and an oversized subwoofer in the trunk.
This is not acceptable. I’m more of a Subaru Forester kind of guy. Bummer.
What’s Up: So, while I plan my next move re: the FSP’s, I’ve decided to try to equalize these things. In general, I like the sound of the M-100 – they just have way too much bass and slightly recessed mids. Audirvana Plus’s Audiounits preference has a 31-band graphic equalizer plugin that looked up to the task. That being said, I’ve never used digital EQ for anything before, so I’ll just outline what I’ve tried. Mainly, I want to see if the logic of what I’m doing seems fairly sound or if I’m just plain doing this wrong.
First, I pulled up two FR charts, the M-100’s and the FSP’s from InnerFidelity, and the headphone target response curve from Olive-Welti-McMullen (2013) also from IF.
Next, I set about trying to correct the bass. It looked to me like the M-100’s have a bass hump of around 8-9db – that’s a lot of bass. But, the target response and the FSP do have a slight subbass/bass bump of around 5db from 20-70hz, which then declines from 70 until it levels out at 250hz. Splitting the difference, I left around 5db in and applied a -4db EQ from 20-60hz, with incrementally smaller decreases until 250hz. (There is a slight FR shift/notch on the graph between 100 and 125hz, so I decreased and increased accordingly.)
After that, I wanted to touch up the midrange. Looking again at the target & FSP for the mids, the M-100 seems to have a recessed midrange from 250-800hz, so I brought the mids up gradually until reaching +3db @ 400hz and then tapered back down to +0db @ 800hz.
Results: So far, this is what it looks like…

…and it sounds quite a bit better. I haven’t tried playing with the treble yet, as I’m afraid it won’t EQ as well. I’m playing it safe and leaving the treble as it is for the moment.
Wrapup: So, all that being said, I think this is what I’m looking for as far as feedback/comments/assistance:
1. Tips on whether or not I’m on the right track here with how I’m going about EQing this headphone. Am I getting anything fundamentally wrong? Is there any better/more precise way of doing this?
2. Thoughts on fixing the headphone clamp problem on the Focal Spirit Professionals. IMO, They don’t stretch very well becaus
e of issues with the design of the headband and stretching them would mess with the seal. For those that have this headphone for longer than my few weeks, did the clamp get any better for you over a longer period of time? It would be a shame to give up on a headphone because of something as dumb as jaw pressure.
3. Recommendations on FSP/M-100 alternatives. In my FSP review link at the beginning, I outline what mid-fi portables I’ve tried. Keeping in mind the clamp issues, anything else you have to recommend would be most welcome.
4. Anything. I’m happy to read peanut gallery comments or whatever. Thanks!