CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 12:43:34 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 47

Author Topic: Movie Discussion Thread  (Read 38713 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tdockweiler

  • Guest
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #100 on: January 12, 2013, 05:04:21 AM »

I had the flu for the past few days so I mostly watched movies.

The Black Book - 9.25/10

This was a big surprise and I won't question it's historical accuracy.
It's about a woman who becomes a spy for the resistance during WWII and gets into the gestapo HQ. Felt there was tons of good stuff in here to think about. Kind of wore out it's welcome a bit towards the end and one or two scenes were kind of overdone (one involving poo).

If you haven't seen it, watch it along with "Army of Shadows". If you watch that one, make sure you stick with it because it's fairly slow at first.

In Which We Serve - 5/10

Couldn't get into this old British movie from the 40's.

Casablanca - 8.5/10

First time I saw this. Felt like every women in this movie rubbed onions in their eyes for each scene.

Lbs - 7.5/10

Low budget movie and it's free on Amazon Prime. Not many people are willing to make a movie like this. It's about an overweight food addict who moves out to the middle of nowhere and lives in a camping trailer with a goal of losing weight. I'm surprised I actually finished this and kind of liked it. The characters were a bit weird. Sometimes it took itself way too serious.

Run Silent, Run Deep - 8/10

Old submarine WWII movie with Burt Lancaster and Clark Gable. I prefer "Destination Tokyo" despite it's racist nonsense.

If you like WWII movies check out "Dam Busters". I need to buy that..

Before these my last two 9.5 and over movies have been the Japanese film "I Wish" and the documentary "Jiro Dreams of Sushi". Note: both are free on prime.

Logged

olor1n

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +56/-0
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 294
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #101 on: January 12, 2013, 11:58:09 PM »

Django - Awesome. Fine performances throughout, particularly from SLJ (lol) and Leo.

Argo - I was expecting a tension filled thriller akin to Munich and was somewhat dissapointed at the lighter tone. Still enjoyed it though and it reaffirmed Affleck as one of my favourite directors.

Zero Dark Thirty - Loved it... up until the film's closing frames. Not sure why the female lead is getting Oscar buzz though.
Logged

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #102 on: January 14, 2013, 09:25:30 AM »

This is pretty awesome news. 

http://geektyrant.com/news/2012/10/19/hbo-wants-a-new-world-war-ii-series-and-they-got-david-finch.html

I'm glad they're continuing these series.  I think they're important, esp if they're done (fairly) accurately.  I love Band of Brothers and The Pacific.  I'd like to see many more, it's a great format for the subject and there's so many stories to tell.  Hopefully they don't try to do too much as in Pacific. 

I had previously read that HBO wasn't going to be making these super expensive series anymore, but this must mean they are still lucrative which can only mean moar.
Logged

shipsupt

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +160/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1687
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #103 on: January 14, 2013, 10:29:15 AM »

Hoping to see more too!  Band of Brothers was fantastic.  The Pacific got a little to into the back/love story for me at times, in fact I'm not sure I ever watched the last episode which was post war wrap up.  Good stuff!  :)p7
Logged
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #104 on: January 14, 2013, 05:46:00 PM »

I hope the action and dialogue is realistic like the Pacific and not sanitized and cartoony like Band of Brothers.  I have yet to be able to finish a single episode after trying three times.

Thematically the Pacific theater is tough due to the island hopping.  Might be a carrier based squadron like the Enterprise rather than something like Black sheep squadron.

Someone should do Anzio since most people don't know we were never able to defeat the Germans in Italy.  Or how about the Spielberg crew move out of WW2 into the more complex and pertinent Korean War and do the Frozen Chosin.   
« Last Edit: January 14, 2013, 05:51:10 PM by Analixus »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #105 on: January 14, 2013, 07:58:41 PM »

I'm not sure I get what you mean about the action in BOB.  I get why you'd say The Pacific is more realistic in the dialogue and action, but a lot of the action in BOB seemed pretty well done to me, even if not quite as gritty as the Pacific.  I'm guessing it's the sentimental plot lines that are combined into the action in BOB.  I mean what about the shelling scenes in Bastogne? 

Despite that, I think BOB had a more well constructed story line.  I get why The Pacific would be challenging because of the island hopping, but they should have kept it to Sledge and the sports writer (forget his name) and they should have left out Basilone and the love story and all that.  Would have been better not to jump around that much and give Sledge and the writer more time and more story.  Episodes of them on the ships between islands, or on another island would have been better than a third character.  Or an episode about them on the islands cleaning up after the war.  Part of what is good about the miniseries format is having so much more time to tell a story and develop characters, and breaking it up into that many stories kind of defeats that advantage IMO. 
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #106 on: January 14, 2013, 08:57:18 PM »

It's an overall ambiance thing that I simply can't connect with.  There's a slight Disneyesque/Warhorse kind of sheen to it.  Something like of the sum of a bunch of little things messing up the overall effect of sincerity.  As far as a sense of genuineness Private Ryan had it, Pacific had it, Das Boot had it, City of Life and Death had it, Hurt Locker had it (for the most part).  I'd have to try to sit through it again and do a point by point analysis.  I found the dialogue and interactions between characters in BoB pretty shallow and often forced tbh.  I was much more drawn into every character in Private Ryan w/ the development that took place in about an hour compared to all the time BoB spent on their character development.  In a way, let's just say BoB was neutral, had low distortion but also weaker dynamic range and lacked holographic imaging for me.

John Basilone is one of the most famous Marines in history along with Chesty Puller so it would be hard to do a Pacific story w/o him.  Especially what he/they did on Guadalcanal.  Since the story was based on the diaries of the actual men maybe they should have tried telling each story as an individual chapter/short story rather than splicing stuff together.  Or keep it separate until Iwo.

Edit - See I call massive BS on scenes like this.  They need orders to seek cover?  Advance in plain view and stand around out in the open talking about shit?  Germans say 'Fire!' in English?  What??  Germans flee into isolated and enclosed buildings w/ no way out so they can get grenaded together w/o possibility of returning fire?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6da9U6Xjd8
« Last Edit: January 14, 2013, 09:45:33 PM by Analixus »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #107 on: January 14, 2013, 10:04:26 PM »

We're looking at it from very different perspectives since i have no combat experience.  But it's definitely something different than War Horse because I couldn't stand that movie as you know. 

Wasn't Dike telling them to stop and fall back?  It looks like they all take cover where they can given his orders.  I thought the same thing about the Germans running into the hut haha.  yeah...   And I didn't consciously notice the German saying "fire" though I had an odd feeling about that shot, always struck me as out of place. 

Also agree that it doesn't go as deep as you'd hope given it's length.  Other movies convey much more in an hour than BOB. 

I'm not sure I think fame means Basilone has to be included if the intent is to tell the bigger story and sense of what it was like for many soldiers.    But maybe the problem wasn't the number of stories, but the way they did it. 
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #108 on: January 14, 2013, 11:59:29 PM »

Definitely not Warhorse bad, only like 10% of that on the Disney meter.  Reminds me of something I think nikongod said about multi BAs once.  Most people don't notice multi driver incoherency, but once you hear it you'll laser right in on it from then on.

I get BoB storyline, it is phenomenal in it's epic character deployment and using the real vets was well done.  They couldn't do that in the Pacific since they had already died.

I didn't mean to say 'fame' was critical to his inclusion but what he did was essential as was what the Marines did at Guadalcanal was even though they were surrounded on land and sea by the Japanese. http://www.basiloneparade.com/citation-guad.htm That was core to the plot and history of the conflict.  I wish they had somehow worked in the Tarawa landing to set the stage from the outset.  Imagine the underwater scenes from Private Ryan at Normandy but with a shallow coral reef (3 feet deep) extending over 500s yard from the beaches landing zone with Marines strung out all over taking fire.  Freaks me out thinking about it.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tarawa

When you advance, you use cover if it's there, you don't need an order to keep from someone blowing your head off.  It happens a few times, like a scene where a mass of Airborne are huddled up on a road into an enemy town and they decide to charge down the road straight in, even though the outer perimeter has tons of tall grass and buildings to use as natural cover.  Their camouflage is green, not asphalt colored.  Infantry would never charge down the middle of town road, that's called 'channeling' and is exactly what you want if you are a defender. That's how the 300 Spartans punished Xerxes for so long by using the Hot Gates.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Movie Discussion Thread
« Reply #109 on: January 15, 2013, 12:35:22 AM »

Funny, I had the same thought about that road attack as well. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 47