Lobby > IEM Measurements

LH Verb

(1/3) > >>

ultrabike:
So Rich sent these for a listen and checkup. These are my impressions:

These are a little lean. But then I do tend to like IEMs that others consider bassy. I was honestly expecting quite a bit worse given what I've heard about them. I was expecting an analog phone line. These are not that bad, but they do lack dynamics, and have a somewhat recessed/weird mid-range. I feel there is some glare to these as well. Channel balance seems off in this particular set. Again, to me bass does not satisfy, but others might disagree.

Versus the Tenores, I definitively prefer the Tenores which have more impact and IMO much better mid range.

Anyhow. Here are some measurements.

Frequency Response



Distortion Right



Distortion Left



I did measure the Tenores that Rich send along with these and they measured very close to the Tenores that I measured in the past.

Here is a comparo:



The channel balance might be a defect of this particular set.

Many thanks to Rich for supplying this set! :)p5

shotgunshane:
Lean?!?!  :-00
Play around with the seal a bit. A loose seal certainly reduces much of the bass but a full seal is over the top.  The only iem I have ever heard that was bassier was the brand TFTA  poo

OJneg:
I thought these were supposed to be uber-bassy?

ultrabike:
I dunno guys. I think the Tenores are more warm, and are more dynamic and detailed while at it.

Maybe there is product variation? Will remeasure.

Anaxilus:
UB has very unique ear canals. Puts Astralstorm's to shame.

G, if you want to play around with my ODAC let me know and we can do a swap.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page