CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:38:54 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4

Author Topic: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X  (Read 4078 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« on: April 19, 2015, 08:26:30 PM »



I think these headphones are very slick looking. This is one of my favorite design aesthetics around. The AT wing system works well for my head but if your head is small/narrow you might have issues where you get more pressure below your ear than above. I need a rubber band between wings to keep it tighter

Early impressions:
  • These still have that kinda romantic/emphasised japanese midrange. Gets fatiguing after a while
  • I don't get much soundstage depth in front of me; it's mostly concentrated in lobes to each side of my head. good width
  • Better bass than I remember the AD2k, more in quantity and impact. Improved tonal balance, not thin.
  • I think these might sound best with a slight output impedance boost. 10-20 ohms
  • very lively sounding headphone
  • could be cleaner sounding, slight resonant or congested quality going on
  • these have a slight edginess with certain instruments
  • snare sound good, uncompressed. kick drum is lacking last bit of oomph though
  • Treble has just a wee bit of transient sharpness. These are best at low volumes

In summary:

I hear a lot of people saying these are "fast" sounding. While I get why they might say that, to my ears it's a speed by virtue of coloration rather than technical ability. I'm having a hard time deciding whether this headphone is really any more resolving/technically capable than the HD600. But overall I like the increased bass pretense and warmth. I see these going used/import market for $300-500 in which case you could do a lot worse.

Will hand off to Marv for direct comparison to original AD2K and eventual measurements. I think these might have some potential mod-ability to cut down on what I would guess are some prominent upper midrange/treble irregularities.

Questions/comments welcome.
Logged

Thad E Ginathom

  • Politically Incorrect Ex-Hippie
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +25/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 648
  • In the end... cats.
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2015, 10:20:33 PM »

.

The AT wing system works well for my head but if your head is small/narrow you might have issues where you get more pressure below your ear than above

.

Being a thin-face, that's my experience of the AT winged series, with the AD900. Pressure on the jaw. However, with a bit of adjustment, which also made more than a bit of difference to the sound, I felt so comfortable with them that I could walk away, forgetting the umbilical chord.

Logged
Cats are nice

donunus

  • Cheapus Sexus
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +52/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 875
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2015, 10:25:39 PM »

The new X series has a different wing system vs the older AT cans. The new ones wings are practically useless. All thats holding the headphone in place are the cups with the new system. I am basing this judgement on my experience with other X series cans though, not the AD2000X.
Logged
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound

The Alchemist

  • Tech Admin
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +9000/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 374
  • CHANGSTAR MODERATOR
    • Alchemy Facebook Page
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2015, 02:37:59 AM »

I think the ATH-R70x looks promising!
Logged
My Bandcamp Alchemy page:
https://jeremydixon.bandcamp.com/

All proceeds are non-profit and go towards financing the production of my album.

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2015, 03:45:09 AM »

I think the ATH-R70x looks promising!

Hate to kill your enthusiasm but I thought the R70x was pretty sub-par when I demo-ed it at NAMM.
Logged

GoldfishX

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Powder Monkey
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +6/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 70
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2015, 06:01:28 AM »

I had the AD2000X as a main headphone early on and I was never too crazy about it. Could never get a decent fit with the headband (couldn't move my head at all) and the sound was pretty "in your face", with a mediocre soundstage (hmm, Grado?). I don't miss them at all (and frankly, I'm done with Audio Technica headphones until they get rid of the wing headband design).
Logged
Main: Sony HAP-S1 -> (working on HP amp) -> HD800/HD600

Work: DX50 (lineout, Rockbox firmware) -> Schiit Lyr (1980's Voshkod Rockets -> Mad Dog

"Don't believe the hype, believe the results"

The Alchemist

  • Tech Admin
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +9000/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 374
  • CHANGSTAR MODERATOR
    • Alchemy Facebook Page
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2015, 02:50:14 PM »

Hate to kill your enthusiasm but I thought the R70x was pretty sub-par when I demo-ed it at NAMM.


Thank you OJneg for thr info on the R70x. I appreciate it!
Logged
My Bandcamp Alchemy page:
https://jeremydixon.bandcamp.com/

All proceeds are non-profit and go towards financing the production of my album.

keanex

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +23/-8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 241
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2015, 02:23:21 AM »

Thanks for sharing your views. I mostly agree with the assessment and I look forward to seeing them measured. Hopefully we could get updated Ad2k measurements while we're at it?
Logged

metal571

  • Swabbie
  • Brownie Points: +5/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2015, 02:43:34 AM »

Looking forward to measurements of this.

I heard this exact pair, and the mids definitely have some kind of decay thing going on. "Romantic" seems like the right word to describe them, but never "technically proficient." That's the kind of cans these are.
Logged

dreamwhisper

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Powder Monkey
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +8/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 77
Re: Audio Technica ATH-AD2000X
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2015, 05:37:17 AM »

That awkward feeling when you're an ATH fanboy but don't own an ATH headphone anymore.
And, I really feel like I could really use one in a mid-fi rig for low quality recordings in particular.

The real beauty of ATH headphones seems to be in their low amplification requirements and how they lean towards that kind of mid-fi sensibility.
You can comfortably go full-on midfi with your rig, using just an ipod/budget DAC. (and adding an older dynalo amp if you want to give the headphones a tiny bit more soundstage and frequency extension)
Most seem to sound decent on an amp that powerful. Some are even less picky, sounding good on budget op-amp solutions.

The main selling point of the AD2000 in particular is the fact that it was available when the HD650 sounded really veiled on even a balanced rig with cable upgrade etc.  zzzz
And the AD2000 seemed, to my mind, just as resolving as the balanced HD650.
Also, since it didn't have the veil/darkness, it came across as moar detailed and therefore moar better.

That's probably the main ephiphany that made me constantly curious about ATH as a brand. The fanboy was born.  :spank:

I'd be curious to know if the AD2000 scales on higher end gear.  p:3 I still believe.  p:3
« Last Edit: April 29, 2015, 04:15:05 PM by dreamwhisper »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4