CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:08:40 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Review: The Reveel  (Read 2998 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LFF

  • Mastering Wizard & Restoration Guru
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +761/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1425
Review: The Reveel
« on: February 24, 2014, 02:46:47 AM »

The Reveel

It seems that all of a sudden there is a new renaissance in wanting to “complete” the personal listening experience on headphones. More than any other time, people are seeking to compensate the personal experience of headphone listening by using devices with cross-feed or other tricks to expand and create a realistic soundstage. One might argue that headphone audiophiles are responsible for this push towards a more realistic presentation - perhaps trying to mimic what one might experience with a high end speaker system.

Companies are now trying to capitalize on this by offering cross-feed circuits, angled pads, new circuits and now, a separate component to add to your chain...the Reveel.

TECHNOLOGY

The Reveel is claimed to be a product that retrieves information that is inaudible in normal stereo listening. The Reveel is able to make this information audible and completes the listening experience for headphone users.

The Reveel is said to be a “a method of retrieving sonic information from audio signals that provides a realistic and complete rendering of the original acoustic event. q0l is NOT a processor; it does not synthesize a signal or alter the natural sensory information in any way. Instead of "adding" a host of processing techniques intended to create "effects," we have simply found a way to extract information already present in recordings, but otherwise hidden in conventional reproduction. Our technology enables COMPLETE capture, transmission, and reproduction of such information, including elements that, until now, have remained hidden and buried in electronics, and unavailable to the listener. The result is an audio experience with fullness and richness beyond comparison and one which carries essentially all the dynamic, tonal, and spatial content of a real sonic event.”

Having been in audio mastering and audio restoration for over 14 years, I have heard such claims before. But, how does the Reveel compare? Does it work?

Let’s find out!


The Testing

I took two test tracks from an old free test disc which was available on the net for many years. I put them on my imod ipod using the line out, to the reveel, and then proceeded to record the original signal (via the bypass switch on the reveel) and then with the bypass switch turned off.

The Results:

The Original (Bypass):
https://soundcloud.com/fpaudio/original-bypass?in=fpaudio/sets/reveel-testing

The Reveel:
https://soundcloud.com/fpaudio/reveel?in=fpaudio/sets/reveel-testing

MS Processing:
https://soundcloud.com/fpaudio/msed-sidegain-1-6?in=fpaudio/sets/reveel-testing

K-Stereo:
https://soundcloud.com/fpaudio/test-k-stereo?in=fpaudio/sets/reveel-testing


NOTE:

The results posted above give an accurate representation of what each process does to a sound file. Unfortunately, due to legal reasons, I am unable to share what it can do to mono and stereo music.

CONCLUSION:


SAVE YOUR MONEY!!! :)p2

Link to other impressions: http://www.changstar.com/index.php/topic,1438.msg38407.html#msg38407
« Last Edit: February 25, 2014, 12:03:43 AM by Anaxilus »
Logged
These statements are false.
I rule with an iron fist and ears of gold!
The preceding statements were true.

The way to a man's heart is through her stomach.

ultrabike

  • Burritous Supremus (and Mexican Ewok)
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +4226/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2384
  • I consider myself "normal"
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2014, 05:28:16 AM »

Awesome!!!  :money:

"q0l is NOT a processor; it does not synthesize a signal or alter the natural sensory information in any way. Instead of "adding" a host of processing techniques intended to create "effects," we have simply found a way to extract information already present in recordings, but otherwise hidden in conventional reproduction"

 :-Z Yeah right.

Seems to me things are more loud and compressed w the Reveel. Perhaps more edgy to.

I liked the K-Stereo best. Seems it's about $1k though :'(
Logged

LFF

  • Mastering Wizard & Restoration Guru
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +761/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1425
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2014, 05:48:02 AM »

K-Stereo has yet to be beat in my honest opinion.


Moreover, K-Stereo can be controlled. You can only apply it on the highs, the lows, the mids or the whole thing. It works wonders for old 78 records too.


It is a shame it's so expensive.


Too bad you guys don't know any mastering engineers who have it. :)p8
Logged
These statements are false.
I rule with an iron fist and ears of gold!
The preceding statements were true.

The way to a man's heart is through her stomach.

Armaegis

  • Uphill, both ways
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +76/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 883
  • metallurgist, rocket scientist, swing dancer
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2014, 06:13:31 AM »

The Reveel sounds like a weird reverb with a layer of distortion smeared on top...  :)p18
Logged
Do you think there may be an acoustic leak from the jack hole? ~Tyll Hertsens

Not sure if I like stuffing one hole or both holes. Tending toward one hole since both holes seems kinda ghey ~Purrin

donunus

  • Cheapus Sexus
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +52/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 875
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2014, 07:21:55 AM »

It is already pretty bad with this simple test, how much more with music.
Logged
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound

LFF

  • Mastering Wizard & Restoration Guru
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +761/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1425
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2014, 09:50:07 AM »

It is already pretty bad with this simple test, how much more with music.

Indeed.

One interesting thing I noted is that even in bypass mode, the Reveel still interacts with the sound in a negative way. How do I know?

I played a pure mono track into it and recorded the output. The resulting signal was no longer pure mono. There was a channel difference between left and right. It wasn't huge but it was noticeable. 

I removed the Reveel and played it again but without the Reveel in the signal path. Perfect mono.
Logged
These statements are false.
I rule with an iron fist and ears of gold!
The preceding statements were true.

The way to a man's heart is through her stomach.

donunus

  • Cheapus Sexus
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +52/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 875
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2014, 10:01:06 AM »

so not only is the effect bad, the analog electronics inside is cheap too WTF
Logged
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound

TMRaven

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +34/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2014, 02:39:31 PM »

The major thing I noticed was the loudness.  So the Reveel effects the loudness on the digital front?  Pretty horrible.
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2014, 05:06:13 PM »

« Last Edit: February 24, 2014, 06:35:28 PM by marvey »
Logged

burnspbesq

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +50/-23
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 640
Re: Review: The Reveel
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2014, 06:15:17 PM »

Just out of idle curiosity, have any of y'all had any actual seat time with reveel?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2