CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 02:20:52 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6

Author Topic: What do you value in a set of speakers?  (Read 9039 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

anetode

  • an objectivist trapped in a subjectivist's body
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +178/-7
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2013, 10:05:46 PM »

A true electrostatic subwoofer is basically impossible to make/power.  The panels would be something like 20 feet wide.  I'd love to see something that wacky pulled off, but I'm not sure how the hell they'd be driven.

I have faith in the sort of audiophile crazy which brought us underfloor horn subs:



Of course having heard the 2905s in-room I found that they don't *need* a sub, I'm just thinking of some multi-panel 100db+ monstrosity :)p3
Logged
Love isn't always on time.

lmswjm

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +135/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 242
  • aka Bill
    • All of Bach
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2013, 10:06:28 PM »

I have always had active monitors in my den for the reasons posted above. I've gone through some of the usual suspects over the years and recently settled on the Swiss made PSI Audio A17M's. SOS declares them and the bigger A21M's among the very best of all time. I could not want for anything more:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul11/articles/psi-a17m-a21m.htm
Logged
http://allofbach.com
The Spirituality of Improvisation, Charlie Haden (1937-2014)
"With regard to musicianship, he taught it was more important to be a great person first...humility, compassion, honesty, unconditional love for all life...only then could one strive to be a great musician." Josh Haden

Tari

  • Poet Laureate of Changstaria
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +245/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 854
  • Is tari a wizard
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2013, 11:41:13 PM »

Are you against going "pro?"

Personally I would advocate for a pair of nice studio monitors.

The new KH 310A look really promising.

http://www.neumann-kh-line.com/neumann-kh/home_en.nsf/root/prof-monitoring_studio-monitors_nearfield-monitors_KH310A

ATC has an audiophile-esq advocacy in the studio world but unless you are dropping 15k you probably won't get the extension you want.

EDIT: well crappola, I didn't read that as carefully as I should.  Short story, I actually agree almost 100% with your priorities which is why I went into recommendation mode as this is the direction I ended up going.  I see now though you weren't looking for recommendations.  Sorry. :)

Nothing against pro speakers :)

Funny, but ATC are at the very top of my list to be auditioned. I became interested in them when I saw several UK studios using them as well as Doug Sax. I have a couple of people telling me they are bright, so that is concerning.


Would any of those people happen to be Bruce from Puget Sound?  He's got something against them, not sure whats going on there.  I'd try to audition them either way though, I have heard the term "sterile" thrown around.


higherfi often has atc demo units at ~40-50% off but they won't let you have demo periods with them.
Logged

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2013, 12:19:29 AM »

There are a lot of different ways to make a great loudspeaker. Pro monitors definitely have their benefits, but also often have drawbacks as well. Many are designed as tools, not to be enjoyable in the listening room. What you get from these types of monitors is a rather matter of fact presentation designed to avoid surface reflections and give the mixing or mastering engineer as clear as possible of a response so that they can hear their mistakes and fix them. I do not enjoy listening to these types of monitors, they typically have terrible soundstaging (that's not the point) and are often rather boring.

Another type I generally avoid are those with undamped cabinets (Zu) or speakers designed to use their cabinets as part of their output (Harbeth, DeVore). Cabinets aren't drivers and they shouldn't act as such. These speakers often have devoted fan bases (so do Grados), but I'm not among them.

All most all ribbon tweeters completely suck. Anything with a Fountek or LCY in it should be avoided. The Illuminator AirCirc kicks the crap out of all of them. ScanSpeak's Be tweeter is very good, many of them are not. Accuton ceramics depend on who designed the speaker. They can be absolutely phenomenal in the right hands (Tidal, Estelon) or sound brittle and sterile in the wrong hands.

I've often found ESLs to be total failures at the "disappearing act". Many of my experiences with ESLs have been that the sound is literally painted on the panel, combine that with limited dynamic ability and I'm bored within minutes.

Generally a narrow baffle combined with a small cabinet gives you the best chance to have the speaker disappear as a source, this is why most of the better 2-way monitors usually excel at it. The trouble with a 2-way is bass extension, which you can get around either by way of side firing woofers ala Audio Physic, or two-piece cabinets like Verity.

Short of the megabuck stuff, IMO this guy nails it better than any other. There isn't that much below 40Hz, but everything above that is stellar, the OBX-RW just nails it at everything far better than even very good speakers like the Merlin VSM. The Joseph Perspective and the Dynaudio Confidence C2 are also extremely good, but I think the Living Voice is the best on the market below about $18K or so.

Logged

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2013, 01:06:45 AM »

I agree with Milos.
Logged

omegakitty

  • Guest
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2013, 03:10:05 AM »

Are you against going "pro?"

Personally I would advocate for a pair of nice studio monitors.

The new KH 310A look really promising.

http://www.neumann-kh-line.com/neumann-kh/home_en.nsf/root/prof-monitoring_studio-monitors_nearfield-monitors_KH310A

ATC has an audiophile-esq advocacy in the studio world but unless you are dropping 15k you probably won't get the extension you want.

EDIT: well crappola, I didn't read that as carefully as I should.  Short story, I actually agree almost 100% with your priorities which is why I went into recommendation mode as this is the direction I ended up going.  I see now though you weren't looking for recommendations.  Sorry. :)

Nothing against pro speakers :)

Funny, but ATC are at the very top of my list to be auditioned. I became interested in them when I saw several UK studios using them as well as Doug Sax. I have a couple of people telling me they are bright, so that is concerning.


Would any of those people happen to be Bruce from Puget Sound?  He's got something against them, not sure whats going on there.  I'd try to audition them either way though, I have heard the term "sterile" thrown around.


higherfi often has atc demo units at ~40-50% off but they won't let you have demo periods with them.

Yep, it's Bruce (WBF). I've seen his comments against them in several posts. Which is interesting since I can't stand the Focals he likes.

I know some others didn't like them from the Pink Floyd surround demo. If any demo is playing speakers at a continuous 105 dB with 135 dB peaks I would run screaming out of the room even the speakers had nothing past 6 KHz. That is just insanely loud to listen to anything.
Logged

omegakitty

  • Guest
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2013, 03:21:18 AM »

There are a lot of different ways to make a great loudspeaker. Pro monitors definitely have their benefits, but also often have drawbacks as well. Many are designed as tools, not to be enjoyable in the listening room. What you get from these types of monitors is a rather matter of fact presentation designed to avoid surface reflections and give the mixing or mastering engineer as clear as possible of a response so that they can hear their mistakes and fix them. I do not enjoy listening to these types of monitors, they typically have terrible soundstaging (that's not the point) and are often rather boring.

Another type I generally avoid are those with undamped cabinets (Zu) or speakers designed to use their cabinets as part of their output (Harbeth, DeVore). Cabinets aren't drivers and they shouldn't act as such. These speakers often have devoted fan bases (so do Grados), but I'm not among them.

All most all ribbon tweeters completely suck. Anything with a Fountek or LCY in it should be avoided. The Illuminator AirCirc kicks the crap out of all of them. ScanSpeak's Be tweeter is very good, many of them are not. Accuton ceramics depend on who designed the speaker. They can be absolutely phenomenal in the right hands (Tidal, Estelon) or sound brittle and sterile in the wrong hands.

I've often found ESLs to be total failures at the "disappearing act". Many of my experiences with ESLs have been that the sound is literally painted on the panel, combine that with limited dynamic ability and I'm bored within minutes.

Generally a narrow baffle combined with a small cabinet gives you the best chance to have the speaker disappear as a source, this is why most of the better 2-way monitors usually excel at it. The trouble with a 2-way is bass extension, which you can get around either by way of side firing woofers ala Audio Physic, or two-piece cabinets like Verity.

Short of the megabuck stuff, IMO this guy nails it better than any other. There isn't that much below 40Hz, but everything above that is stellar, the OBX-RW just nails it at everything far better than even very good speakers like the Merlin VSM. The Joseph Perspective and the Dynaudio Confidence C2 are also extremely good, but I think the Living Voice is the best on the market below about $18K or so.



Have you ever heard Coincidents?

I know someone I trust that is a huge fan of Living Voice speakers, he pointed me to the Nottingham tables which beat everything else I have heard in its price. I almost heard them one time when I was in Toronto, but ran out of time :(

My issue with ESLs is they just can't image like a really good box speaker. Other than that one damn flaw I love Sound Labs since they tick off all the rest of the boxes in my criteria.
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2013, 03:51:44 AM »

1, 2a, 4/2b (tied).

Edit - I lied; 4, 1, 2a, 2b.  I prefer the massive dynamic swings (macro/micro) and detail you get when you play an instrument more than the flatter, more diffuse dynamics/resolution of being out in the middle of the concert hall.  I'll take a hint of coloration to enhance the euphony of the experience as long as I get the affect of 'playing there' rather than just 'being/listening there'.  Based on my limited observations I'd say that some consider the sound of playing an instrument too colored or 'in your face'.  Might help some understand my preferences/impressions better.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2013, 04:15:58 AM by Analixus »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2013, 03:56:13 AM »

I'm into the high efficiency, highly dynamic, and transparent thing now. Probably going to build a full range Fostex back loaded horn next. Madisound seems to have some easy kits. I expect linear FR, bass extension, and ultimate volume capabilities to be thrown out the door. I actually don't have any strong priorities. One of my favorites was a JBL compression driver / CD horn  + 12" woofer. No room for that anymore.
Logged

jrb

  • Guest
Re: What do you value in a set of speakers?
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2013, 05:10:42 AM »

Just a few words about ATCs in my first genuine post here, since I can write from experience.  I've gone through a number of good speakers, and have heard a good deal more over the years.  I use speakers at home for pleasure as well as, sometimes, for monitoring for sound design in the theater.  About ten years ago now, I got off the speaker carousel with ATCs.  I have ATC active fifties and passive 20s downstairs, a pair of passive ATC monitors for my office upstairs and active ATC 10s for a home theater upstairs.

Obviously, I don't find them sterile; and they are simply not bright.  The passives, however, will reflect pretty accurately the  electronics and front end they see.  And they need current and watts to sound their best.  The actives, I find, are indeed very sensitive to the preamps in front of them.  There are genuine impedance matching issues that rule out some otherwise very good sounding preamps.

At their best, the ATCs are tonally about as accurate as I've heard, and they are--actives and passives with enough horsepower driving them--remarkably dynamic: the best I've heard.  They also throw a very precise, though not huge, soundstage, and they allow for great depth.  Instrument separation is first rate, and voices are remarkably lifelike.  The bass is extraordinarily convincing, for as much as you get, in all the models: no bloat, no reticence.  But, as  physics dictates, the bigger the speaker the more bass you get.  ATC monitors, like the 10s and 20s, will get a remarkably even reinforcement from a wall behind them.

The ATC issues are, primarily, in how they mate with electronics.  (I could go through a list of ten high end preamps that just won't work very well with the active ATCs--including Nagra, Spectral, and Chord.)  The passives are in this respect kinder creatures: they'll sound great, if fed enough power, with various front ends.  ATCs don't throw a very wide soundstage.  The bass is, to my ears, much more like life, a lot less like stereo with--even with expensive stuff--some its boom and bloom: for some folks this is a problem not an asset.  Can they sound sterile?  With an inadequate front end, I imagine so; and they can sound bright, but they also can sound dark. 

Their price seems to me their greatest liability, although I think they are better than almost all much, much more expensive speakers I've heard.  But that's just how I hear things.  I've also loved, and been enticed by, SoundLab panels, the TAD 1s, and crazy MBLs; but I've found the ATCs just more practical--economically as well as ergonomically, and easier to live with.

 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6