Maybe it's because we're less interested in lording one over another?I'm considering replacing the ADA4898s with something less power-hungry in the Leckerton, on par with OPA209 both in power use and sonically.Any recommendations? OPA209 is of course out, that one is way too sensitive to cellphones.ADA4898 (~8 mA/ch) is about as power hungry as AD797 (~8 mA/ch) or OPA627 (~ 7 mA/ch), which reduces UHA-6s mkII to ~8 hours instead of 24+ hours w/ OPA209 (~2.5 mA/ch).Plus that one is rather bass-oriented, it sounds like a FET opamp with a bit different (less "oily") timbre, but it's not specified which input stage. Likely JFET.AD8610s are more "upper midrange" from my experience than I'd like, but they are 3 mA/ch, close to OPA209.How is ADA4627 sounding in that amp? Looks like ~7.5 mA/ch; on par with ADA4898, too short.Anything else?
Maybe it's because we're less interested in lording one over another?////AD8610s are more "upper midrange" from my experience than I'd like, but they are 3 mA/ch, close to OPA209.How is ADA4627 sounding in that amp? Looks like ~7.5 mA/ch; on par with ADA4898, too short.
