(Wish granted. ) Actually, I didn't get to spend much time with my brother's HD600s with the old/flattened pads. However, to make things even more confusing, I did notice a pretty big difference between his HD600s (~12+ years old?) and my HD600s which I bought around 10/2012. Both having brand new pads after refurbing my brother's set, his sounded quite a bit more mid-centric. Not in the analytical sense, but with less bass and maybe slightly softer highs compared to my new HD600s. Compared to my HD580s, which as CEETEE mentioned have a very slight vee shaped character to them, my new HD600s sound like a better version of the 580s in every aspect: much stronger bass, less dip in the mids, and clearer mid > highs. I always thought that the HD580s had a softness to their sound (veil?... not sure I'd call it that) that made them listenable for days. My new HD600s seem to have a tiny bit more aggressiveness in the form of the previously mentioned aspects. But it still has that Sennheiser 580/600/650 ease of listenability I seem to get from them.In both cases (old 600 vs. new 600, 580 vs. new 600), the older cans do have quite a few more miles on them compared to the new 600s, which as I write this probably have less than 30 hours on them. So it's not a completely apples to apples comparison. Going back to the old 600 vs. new 600, I don't have both on hand right now so I cannot tell you of any physical differences.So now that we're all thoroughly confused...
Also consider spread in production (tolerances) but most of all changes in the design (quietly done) to materials, pads whatever to improve performance or if they have to use different/cheaper/easier to obtain materials.well known examples : HD650, Dx000, ATH-M50, T50RP to name but a few, even within a few months and production spread Beyer is notorious (Tesla's)