CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS
Lobby => IEM Measurements => Topic started by: Marvey on June 23, 2013, 06:14:14 PM
-
Not much time since I'm busy on other things, but really quick impressions based on a few seconds on three recordings I know well.
- They sound pretty good
- Slightly bassy / warm - toward upper bass / lower low mids
- Good bass punch. Maybe a little bit one-note-ish
- Slight bump around 4k
- Not laid back in the treble - this is good
- This results in maybe a slight recess in the vocal fundamentals region (in audio engineer parlance, not science speak.)
- No, they are not TOTL quality in terms of clarity or detail, but...
- No issues with seal / cheapy plugs worked for me
- I would easily recommend them (assuming $200? I dunno)
Quick measurements coming up in a bit...
-
FR
-
Burst decays
-
These sound warm & bassy despite this FR?!
I predict strong distortion in bass. (and in 30s the THD will be posted, heh)
-
Distortion - calibrated to 90db SPL/A white noise. Left.
-
Interesting, I've expected closer to 1% - but perhaps this might be due to relatively high amounts of high order distortion in bass. Even D5 is near 0.1%, higher orders might be too.
Is it possible to have your rig measure frequency-dependent IMD too? Say, an IMD sweep...
-
actually only $149. warm with that FR may not be a bad thing... seems interesting. would love to hear.
-
Guys, don't confuse this measured bass response w/ an ER4S, it's not a warm version of an Ety. It has more bottom end than the Sony EX series.
-
This is one of those IEMs where it measures really great in basically every parameter, but the sound is mostly meh, not really mindblowing. It's a nice, do no wrong IEM, but it won't give people goosebumps. It's warm and fluffy. In that respect, I was slightly disappointed. I'd get it during Black Friday, but not any other time.
-
Agreed - nothing special - but that it does nothing seriously wrong - and that last aspect never disappoints me.