Gosh, you're right Purrin: Peter Mew did the Let's Dance remaster! Though I trust your ears more than mine to call it bright, I listened to SACD rip and to my ears and with my far from neutral set-up (LCD-3/Lyr with E188CC) I must confess I didn't find it overly bright. Treble might be a little pushed but bass didn't seemed shelved. Is it possible that the CD used a brighter master than the one the SACD? Or is it just that, even modded, the LCD-3 colored the sound too much and masked the bright sound?
Overall, though not perfect, I still prefer a remaster to be slightly off tonewise than overly compressed crap: one can adjust tone with EQ, while a brickwalled master cannot be corrected. The lesser of two evils...
And though I am angry and depressed that so many remasters are crap and I think the guys who did those remasters should be ashamed, I am even more angry with the executives who authorize/push these poor masters to us. They are even more responsible, as they have the final decision in their hands and choose to butcher the sound.
It's the same with video: even Blu-rays are plagued with excess DNR (to the point of removing the grain that was on the original negative) and edge enhancement
.
Bernie Grundman did a lot of remasters. What's wrong with him?
And yes, the good question is: where can you find LFF's remasters?