CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:19:49 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10

Author Topic: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions  (Read 10638 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #10 on: May 06, 2013, 05:33:00 PM »

Sorry for the delay folks, was quite caught up the last week and this week is even more busy.  So here's the the low down, this could either come as bad news and more bad news or bad news and good news depending on your PoV.

First the bad news.  Originally, I just asked what it would cost to add a Joel/Moth treatment to our Leviathan build and got the numbers back that I posted to you guys.  Since then, the Moth thing, the amp project has taken a life of its own turning into something of a Hydra.  As a result, Joel has decided that all Moth orders will be for $9,500, no special price for anybody.  Moth development is also going off on a bit of a tangent and they are also a bit confused as to what direction they actually want to go in.  Everything kind of blew up when there was a bit of a discussion of splitting this original project into two amps.  One, an Eddie Current product, a 2A3x4 w/ only Electraprint transformers all the way around and 6D22S tubes for the power supply, no glow tubes.  The second, a Moth, would be all Tangos all around and use the glow tubes.  I was a bit pissed because it basically offered us zero choice as to the actual product we were originally intent on making, Tango IT and Electraprint partial silver OPT w/ glow tubes.  Not to mention the price jack.  There is now even talk the Moth amp will be a 16 watt 300Bx4 instead but that is apparently coming from Craig wanting to do a speaker amp, Joel and I are still believers in the 2A3 Moth at this point.  Not to mention the Moth amp will not get built for another 6/8/12 months.  Anyway, for various obvious reasons and complications, I think it's best that we split off between EC Leviathan and Joel Moth builds.  So as is, everyone on the original list is for the Leviathan.  Those than want the Moth just let me know and I'll break you off from the Leviathan build.  The Moth build includes everything along w/ EML tubes and such, etc.

The Leviathan build, as it stands, is for a 2A3x4 with Tango interstage transformers and EP partial silver OPTs.  The Powersupply will be the glow tubes using 3b28 (You get your own 866 to swap for the 3b28 if that's what you want, Craig will not provide or support the use of them based on EPA concerns and guidelines, you're on your own).  The price is $3500 for the amp but we have to supply the Tango Interstage.  Craig wants to enclose the glow tubes inside the chassis for safety reasons and use a cut out port to show off the tubes but I'd rather show more of them and have the stick out myself.  Let me know how you guys feel about that. 

I want to get the Tango IT's ordered soon, so be ready.  I have a contact in Japan and waiting to see what feedback I can get from him.

 
 
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #11 on: May 06, 2013, 06:22:31 PM »

I actually think this turned out the best for my needs. I didn't want to say anything before because of things being confusing enough as is, plus I didn't want to rock the boat, but I was a little upset the goal posts for the Leviathan seemed to get pushed further and further back, getting more grandiose and more expensive and sort of losing the initial charm of having something beastly at Craig's lower prices. When it became a Moth project with no definite timeframe and a $8k+ price tag I was seriously considering dropping out of it.

I just want an awesome speaker amp from Craig with xenon rectifiers. Personally I'm cool with either their being exposed or enclosed, so long as the box has cool portholes to let the glow come thru. Also Marv mentioned getting 45s as a special option on his build, and I'd like to do the same with mine if possible. I know most are going to want 2A3s, but as far as a special request for mine, the 45s should be similar enough to the 2A3s?
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.

Tari

  • Poet Laureate of Changstaria
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +245/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 854
  • Is tari a wizard
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2013, 07:00:22 PM »

Frack. 


I really miss my BA right now, so on the one hand I just want something quick.  On the other hand I plan for this to be my last dynamic tube headphone amp purchase and don't want to be looking over my shoulder.


So to clarify, the difference between ~$4700 and $9500 is OPT's, the rectifiers, the fanciness of included 2A3, and Joel laying hands on it?


Would you be coordinating both builds or only the Levi 2A3x4?  I have much less confidence in Craig and Joel getting anything done together without you lighting a fire under them.
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2013, 07:08:31 PM »

Couple of things:

1-I don't know anything about a '45 option'.  so if someone wants to enlighten me feel free.

2-2A3 is not like a 45.  45 has half the power output so your Leviathan would be about half the power output for speakers as it would be w/ 2A3s and also have 20% less gain on top of that.  The plate resistance is twice as high too so you might lose some linearity as well, not sure if/where the roll-off would be especially since the EP transformers are being made for the 2A3.
____

3-Forgot to mention in the last post, the tube glow PS w/ 866 tubes requires some user skill.  There is one switch to turn on the amp which heats the Mercury.  After 2-5 minutes, once the tube goes from hazed to clear, you hit the power supply switch to turn on B+ and ev erything comes alive.  If you mess up and destroy the tubes and/or trasnformer, that is on you, the end user.  It will be $150+shipping for Craig to look at/fix any issues due to user error on this PS.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2013, 07:23:14 PM »

Long story short, I'll be handling both. 

The difference, so far, is OPT (Joel sourcing both IT/OPT), included premium tubes, Moth motif/design/build quality/treatment, etc.  It may or may not be a 2A3 or 300B amp, dunno right now.  Left and Right hand are supposed to do lunch sometime in the near future.  Both amps use same rectifiers as of this moment in time.  I had fight hard on the PS.  The price actually went up a little because it uses twice as many parts, is more complex and takes up more space for sheet metal and the tubes cost a lot more than what was in the original Leviathan. 

I was going to include Moth buyers in the Tango buy but not sure if that's wise now as it's basically in Product development.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2013, 07:24:19 PM »

Really, this all a bit too confusing for me since there seem to be like three or four different amps floating around now that all came from the Leviathan concept.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 08:51:41 PM by MuppetFace »
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #16 on: May 06, 2013, 07:44:59 PM »

No, there are only two.  The Leviathan as I stated, and the Moth build, whatever it becomes.  If you look back, you'll see the Levi variations described in my prior post, that's old news and I killed the Electraprint 2A3.  I told Craig if he went that route I was out.  I'm doing Tango Interstages and if anyone want something else, they can do it on their own.  If anyone wants to buy a Ferrari body with a Ford Windsor engine in it, feel free.  The Tango interstages were never something to be compromised on, EVER.  That was absolutely the last place in the circuit anyone should be looking to save some money.  Craig got the idea somehow from certain people feeding him all sorts of ideas about what he thought he could get away with for ease of manufacture and cheapness.  Some asshole even told him to throw capacitors in it instead of interstage trasnformers.  I'd rather just stick to my Super7.  If people are after sidegrades, that's fine.  That was never the intention of this project.

If anyone gets enough people to do the all EP 2A3x4 then he'll do a batch.  Craig builds batches.  I am not doing anything w/ that unless more than 5 people want to do that amp for $3300.  Then I'll organize an all EP Levi along side.

 
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 07:52:47 PM by Analixus »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Tari

  • Poet Laureate of Changstaria
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +245/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 854
  • Is tari a wizard
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2013, 07:52:30 PM »

Okay.  A further source of confusion is what is going on on the EC 2A3 thread.  So the only current successor to the 2A3 is the Levi, with the Moth being the other possible option. 


Is there any way to convince Craig to use the Tango OPT's if we do the sourcing or is it deliberately being hamstrung to make the Moth more desirable?
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2013, 08:30:41 PM »

I talked to Craig about this (fyi I haven't been following the 2a3 thread if you mean something over on the other site),  In a sense, the Levi is flagship but Craig has no flagships.  Every amp he has on the webpage or has been built can be ordered again as long as you get a minimum of 10 folks to form a run to do so.  Therefore, in essence, he doesn't have a model lineup w/ a hierarchy as he sees it.  So while the Levi is the most transparent of his designs so far, there is no designated crown on the model lineup as there is no model lineup per Craig's thinking to begin with.  Ugh...

I decided to forgo the Tango OPTs for few reasons.  It had nothing to do w/ being hamstrung though that would have been the right read if they did the all EP version and the all Tango version for Moth, a dichotomy which no longer exists after my having resolved the matters confusion to much pain and agony.  There is no defined model lineup, so pick what you want to build as long as everyone  for that single run agrees to every part, period, the END, FIN.

I thought I went over the transformer considerations in the other thread but in case I forgot, I'll do it here.  The Tango OPT, while measurably superior in many ways, has a few issues.  One, sourcing and price.  Not really an issue since we are getting the Tango It some way or another.  Two, based on my listening to the original Levi, there were some discrepancies.  The tone color was too similar between instruments in a laid-back/pleasant sounding sense.  Even Craig noticed this as he called it 'dry' which is completely the wrong word but I got his meaning to be the same as mine after interrogating him.  This is of course despite measuring phenomenally from 15-35khz @ -1dB.  Despite sounding good, it wasn't quite 'correct'.  This is why the decision to go all Tango for the Moth pissed me off because that wasn't a SQ decision but a perceived value/bling/audio cachet decision.  Also, there was a slight grunge or fuzz in the lower mids/upper bass.  I scoured forever trying to figure out if the core was too big or something else was wrong on the original Levi (old tubes, PS design, etc).  Only a few weeks ago, Craig said, 'oh btw, the Tango OPT had a bit more bass distortion.'  Gee thanks for telling me now!  Maybe that was it, maybe it was something else.  Someone had volunteered to buy a set of Tango ITs and OPTs for our testing but that fell through too so we lost another 2 weeks waiting for something that was never going to materialize anyway.  Otherwise we would have had the samples in a few weeks ago already.  The Tango OPTs are not the jewel in the Tango crown, the Tango ITs are the jewel of the transformer world, period.  Thats why we searched for months for alternatives to the Tango OPTs.  Hashimoto was below spec, Lundahl ended up being mediocre though better than most, Tamura and Tribute use exotic amorphous core materials which to my further study and analysis were a combination of side-graded sound and marketing BS.  Audio Note is expensive as a mothereffer and only worth it if you go all in, even then good luck getting matched channels.  Even one of their top amps is channel imbalanced and rolled so they can kiss my ass.  We ended up coming back to Jack at ElectraPrint with three possible different designs.  Those of us that have heard his transformers know, they don't have the tone color issue that the Tango had.  Going with Jack even allowed us to spec the core and windings specifically for the Leviathan build more ideally than the specs on the Tango 2.7 which induces more distortion and resistance.  Jack also gives us the ability to save costs over the Tango and include partial silver in the secondary windings.  The Tangos can't do that.  So in essence, we sacrifice a C-cor e potted Tango and go with a EI-core non-potted EP but with ideal impedance specs and adding silver to the mix.  Unlike with cables, whether you believe in silver or not, silver is a real and measurable impact on transformer construction and performance that nobody can claim is snake oil.  It's actually where the idea came from to market silver in cables.  Audio Note charges like another 4,000 British pounds per pair for silver in their transformers as an upgrade!

We are waiting for the finished Jack OPTs to sample before we close the book on the Levi build.  Jack does make megabuck transformers for megabuck amps, if people go to the SHOW or RMAF they will hear them.  He knows what he's doing but he's a California redneck living in the hills instead of a 10th generation Japanese Sushi chef who's family has been winding robotically perfect copper 20 hours a day ever since the Meiji Restoration.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 08:43:44 PM by Analixus »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: EC 445 (Levi development platform) impressions
« Reply #19 on: May 06, 2013, 08:43:31 PM »

Yeah, it was the 2A3 thread and talk of a 2A3 successor that was part of the confusion for me, as some of the "add-ons" to the 2A3 were starting to sound a lot like older forms of the Leviathan. Hence the confusion. There was never any doubt for me that the Leviathan would have the Tangos (whether it be a Craig or Moth project).

Thanks for the info. Now that I understand Craig's views on his lineup, it kind of makes more sense to me.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 08:52:18 PM by MuppetFace »
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10