CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 11:20:41 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10

Author Topic: Empirical Audio Off-Ramp 5 USB to SPDIF Converter Review OR5  (Read 18116 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #30 on: April 06, 2013, 05:30:47 AM »

USB is shit, which is why the OR5 is so amazing.  The only time I use USB is for ABing gear.  For my own listening pleasure, I went back to CD transports because they are better via coax than typical PC garbage via USB.  The OR5 may change that which would be nice to finally ditch the spinning platter.  Inherently, USB is just shit in typical implementations.  And the XMOS in the PWD is even better than the XSabre and the gap further widens between the two when I went to coax via transport if you recall my review.  USB is the great equalizer, makes everything sound like SHIT!!  :)p12

Erm, if you're talking about USB in general, and not the PWD's specific (or some other DACs specific) USB implementation, that's a MASSIVE generalization and it's totally inaccurate. USB can be either good or bad. It's all in how you 1. get it out of the source and 2. get it in to the converter or DAC.

Starting with the source, the typical laptop with a switch-mode brick is terrible but that's what a lot of people use, and then complain that computers and USB sound like shit. No, laptops and DC power bricks with 8000 tons of DC ripple and noise sound like shit. Just running on battery power can cut the noise from a laptop's USB port in half.

A Mac Mini or an Atom based PC with an external 12V input is a much better option, because you can easily attach a linear PS that has 10% of the ripple of even the finest ATX switching power supplies, and about 1% that of a typical power brick. You also don't want to use just any motherboard USB port. Assuming you have an available PCI-e slot, the SoTM card or the Adnaco card are far superior. Both of those options can also be further enhanced with their own linear power supplies in place of wall-warts. Ideally the computer should also be a dedicated, headless music server - no display, no keyboard or mouse, running the absolute minimum amount of software as possible. Linux and MPD or JRiver and JRemote make that simple enough.

Once you've got the source in order, the rest is up to the DAC, and this is definitely an area where a lot of companies should be doing better - EMM/Meitner being prime examples. The $15K DAC2X has a worthless, bus powered, unisolated USB input. Using the OR5 and coax will easily beat that. They should've done it properly or not bothered at all.

Take a DAC with a first rate USB input like the Overdrive, and a properly built and configured computer source, and even megabuck VRDS Neo transports will have a real fight on their hands.
Logged

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #31 on: April 06, 2013, 05:51:17 AM »

Wondering if the Coax implementation in most DACs is even good enough to warrant using this? Pretty sure the USB input of my DAC had more time/money spent on it than the Coax.

I don't think it's the coax implementation so much as the DAC itself. Obviously attaching an OR5 to a Dac Magic is a total waste of time, as would probably be most DACs below $2500 or so, excepting second hand Alpha S1s or PWD MKIIs which go for about $2K. If you're planning to use a DAC that costs $4-5K, then you should probably ask whether an Overdrive would make more sense. So you could say that there's a fairly small window for $2K USB converters.
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #32 on: April 06, 2013, 05:54:59 AM »

What part of 'Inherently, in typical USB implementations' was unclear?  You think a galvanically isolated/asynchronous or Offramp solution is typical?  Hell, XMOS isn't even typical.  The world of USB is largely comprised of crap solutions, not USB solutions that cost as much as a car or require meticulous hardware or software settings.

I thought the comment would be be pretty obvious that most people take a normal USB port on a normal computer and connect a normal cable to a normal device and think 'voila' done.  That is a 'typical USB implementation'. 

I'll put it this way.  95% of USB implementations are worse than a decent CD transport feeding coax to the same DAC.  It's typical belief that bits are bits and one digital connection is just as good as another.  I've come to appreciate via experience Jason Stoddard's comment when he was starting about why he didn't offer USB on their products, because USB is crap.  At least at the price point they operate at.  They succumbed to the market pressure and offered USB and are now doing it well.  Nobody is going to buy a $1400 OR5 for a Bifrost or Gungnir or most anything else out there even below $2K.  At certain price points, people expect cheap stuff to be a digitally perfect plug and play affair because that's what we've all been promised and force fed.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2013, 06:17:27 AM by Analixus »
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Maxvla

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +211/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1251
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #33 on: April 06, 2013, 06:17:18 AM »

Wondering if the Coax implementation in most DACs is even good enough to warrant using this? Pretty sure the USB input of my DAC had more time/money spent on it than the Coax.

I don't think it's the coax implementation so much as the DAC itself. Obviously attaching an OR5 to a Dac Magic is a total waste of time, as would probably be most DACs below $2500 or so, excepting second hand Alpha S1s or PWD MKIIs which go for about $2K. If you're planning to use a DAC that costs $4-5K, then you should probably ask whether an Overdrive would make more sense. So you could say that there's a fairly small window for $2K USB converters.
An Overdrive is way beyond my means, and that's not even with any upgrades. My original plan was 1500/1500/1500 hp/amp/dac. Spent a little less on the DAC and quite a bit more on the amp, but I'm around where I wanted to be. I really don't want to spend a lot per component so $4-5K DACs are permanently out of the question. Something like the X-Sabre which I already enjoy, taken to new levels (according to this worship thread) with a device around it's price range I could handle as long as the rewards were worth it. That may seem odd, but I can't afford to swing multi-K devices in and out all the time, losing several hundred per buy/sell/return rotation. I see people taking baths on things like RWA and Liquid Fires and I won't let myself be put in that position. Even well regarded gear sells poorly once you get high in price. This is also one reason I will never be into even remotely high end speakers, the resale on them is horrifying, and then there's the shipping... I might try a kit in the vein of what Purrin did, but I will work with the Paradigms I have first.

Another worry about a device like this, is how stable is the technology? We see DACs changing as fast as computer technology these days. Is an Off-ramp going to be viable for many years or phased out quickly? I would be inclined to go with the perhaps improved sound if I didn't end up with a $1k+ paper weight after a year.
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #34 on: April 06, 2013, 06:26:37 AM »

^ I don't think it's going to be a paperweight.  XMOS is about as close as most are even looking at USB atm.  Even if something came out in a few years you'd still have to buy a new DAC rather than having had the OR5 for that whole period of time.  Even then, what would the new DAC offer if you were getting the same performance but a few years earlier?

Anyway, I need to spend more time w/ it on my HD800 rig before I comment further on it myself.  It could miraculously turn to shit too on that, who know.   :-\
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Maxvla

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +211/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1251
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #35 on: April 06, 2013, 06:31:57 AM »

Yes, I'm interested to hear your thoughts on a headphone rig, but I would only imagine a headphone rig would benefit even more due to the proximity of the transducers.

If this type of device is truly great, it could be how you described, a DAC extender, either into the future, or until a greater step could be made much later. That is one reason why I am considering it despite it costing more than my DAC.
Logged

dtrewwye

  • Guest
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #36 on: April 06, 2013, 06:41:28 AM »

Did you guys hear the OR5 w/ the NAD? 
Logged

DaveBSC

  • Best Korean Sympathizer
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +222/-50
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2092
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #37 on: April 06, 2013, 07:09:26 AM »

An Overdrive is way beyond my means, and that's not even with any upgrades. My original plan was 1500/1500/1500 hp/amp/dac. Spent a little less on the DAC and quite a bit more on the amp, but I'm around where I wanted to be. I really don't want to spend a lot per component so $4-5K DACs are permanently out of the question. Something like the X-Sabre which I already enjoy, taken to new levels (according to this worship thread) with a device around it's price range I could handle as long as the rewards were worth it. That may seem odd, but I can't afford to swing multi-K devices in and out all the time, losing several hundred per buy/sell/return rotation. I see people taking baths on things like RWA and Liquid Fires and I won't let myself be put in that position. Even well regarded gear sells poorly once you get high in price. This is also one reason I will never be into even remotely high end speakers, the resale on them is horrifying, and then there's the shipping... I might try a kit in the vein of what Purrin did, but I will work with the Paradigms I have first.

Another worry about a device like this, is how stable is the technology? We see DACs changing as fast as computer technology these days. Is an Off-ramp going to be viable for many years or phased out quickly? I would be inclined to go with the perhaps improved sound if I didn't end up with a $1k+ paper weight after a year.

The OR could definitely help get the most out of the X-Sabre's capability.. in the same way that attaching an Esoteric P-01 would. It's basically a source upgrade. Not having to worry about the USB implementation of whatever DAC you may consider in the future is also a nice bonus. The USB inputs on the vast majority of DACs do indeed suck and will likely continue to suck for some time. I don't see the OR becoming a paper weight any time soon. You can buy the stock version if you want, and then send it back to Empirical to have the clock upgrades or regulator upgrades done later. It's not perfect, the OR4 can't be completely turned into an OR5, and people who bought the old super and ultra clock upgrades can't just have those exchanged for the new clocks, but it's better than nothing.

The only limitation I see with the current OR is that because it uses the Hiface board, it depends on driver support being there for future operating systems. Linux support is also limited. VortexBox supports it, but most other builds don't. The next OR should be a USB class 2 device that wont require drivers for Mac or Linux.

Empirical stuff doesn't come up for sale that often, but I don't recall ever seeing anybody take a bath on old Off-Ramps or Overdrives. Even stuff that's not in the product line anymore like the Pace-car still seem to command good resale when they go up. Some stuff is just like that. Weiss DACs generally hold their value quite well. The DAC202 isn't the hot FOTM DAC anymore, but even now they are still going for a good 2/3 of new retail.

The mighty Levinson 30.6 DAC also still somewhat inexplicably commands a high price even though they are massively outdated technically, and Levinson themselves won't even touch it if something goes wrong.

Paying full price for anything made by PS Audio on the other hand is just asking to get burned. Same with entry level Esoteric stuff, they flatline PDQ.


« Last Edit: April 06, 2013, 07:24:40 AM by DaveBSC »
Logged

uelover

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #38 on: April 06, 2013, 07:24:15 AM »

The next OR should be a USB class 2 device that won't require drivers for Mac or Linux.

I certainly hope so. Will hang on to my Stello U3 till then.
Logged

Maxvla

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +211/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1251
Re: Emprical Audio Off-Ramp USB Converter Review
« Reply #39 on: April 06, 2013, 07:24:19 AM »

I did some looking for news about an OR6, but came up empty, do you have some info on when to expect it?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10