CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 10:49:03 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Audeze LCD-XC  (Read 1840 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TMRaven

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +34/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
Audeze LCD-XC
« on: March 26, 2014, 01:22:17 AM »

I don't think there's been a thread for this on the Mutual Adulation Society of a different flavor, so I thought I'd make one.  I received the XC earlier today thanks to the Headamp Loaner Program and I'll copy/paste my post over at the XC thread over at HF.

"I received the XC from the headamp loaner program, here are some initial musings:
 
Like the LCD2, these are way more gorgeous in-person.  When Audeze made the move to only ship XCs with
Bubinga wood and black anodized rings I thought I would hate the combination, as I didn't like the way it looked on pictures at all. In person the Bubinga wood is much more rich and deep lookin.
 
I wouldn't know that these headphones were 1-150grams heavier than the LCD2 or whatever.  From my memory of the LCD2, these are just as comfortable weight-wise.  They're actually more comfortable to me because the pads are extra soft, and even after they compress over-time, my ears barely do not touch the fazor diffusers.
 
As for the sound, they do not strike me as Boring and overly thick-sounding like the LCD2 did at times, and the bass carries with it not only the Audeze control and extension, but also a characteristic closed-back slower decay and pressure-esque type of bass, which is a plus in my book.
 
The mids are for the most part very good, only I there's something going on in the upper-mids around 2-3khz.  I absolutely hate forward upper-mids because they tend to make a lot of headphones sound cold.  While that's not 100% the case here because I don't see the XC as cold sounding, I do feel the 2-3khz area has a bit of hardness, kind of like a broad, but benign ringing problem in the area.  If you've ever looked at Purrin's CSDs of the HD800s and see what they do in the 6khz area, then you can see at what I'm trying to get at.  This 'problem' also seems to make these headphones very recording specific, as I find myself turning the volume up and down not only between songs, but within different parts of the recordings themselves.  Sometimes I find myself EQ'ing the 2-3khz region down by 3db or so, and this seems to mostly solve the problem and make the mids have a better transition to treble.
 
The soundstage seems to be nice.  Not big enough to make me think it's an open headphone, but also the imaging and definition of the sound is great enough to make me think it's an open headphone.  So it's kind of an in-betweener (very much like the Focal Spirit Pro, medium-size soundstage but defined). I attribute the definition to a smooth lower midrange which most closed headphones tend to lack.  The fazor diffusers probably have a lot to do with this as well because I notice the sound changes severely if you press the cans closer to your ears, playing with the acoustic bounce-back of your skin.
 
The treble I find to be well in balance, not lacking like the LCD2 or not strident like the HE-400 or other headphones.  However it's not as smooth as I think it could be.
 
 
For now I really like their sound, although I haven't done a direct comparison to my tried-and-true EQ'd HE-400 yet.  If I were to look at the headphones without a price, I'd say definite big thumbs-up.  At 1800?  That's extremely tough to say."



Now, I wish I had an LCD2 for a strictly side-by-side comparison, but I don't.  I also could have been unfair on the LCD2 when I had it because at the time it was being fed from a Magni/Modi vs the XC I have now which is being fed from the Asgard2/Uberfrost.

Anyways I really like the way these sound, especially after some easy EQ.  I also think if Audeze makes another revision or two to it and corrects some small things it will be seriously good.  That price though...
« Last Edit: March 26, 2014, 01:29:52 AM by TMRaven »
Logged

Maxvla

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +211/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1251
Re: Audeze LCD-XC
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2014, 02:18:16 AM »

Heard them from a Benchmark DAC2 HGC and it seems like more of the same from Audeze, but this time with even more bass, with more resonance in the bass. Decent, I suppose, but not my cup of tea. Much preferred Dan's Alpha Dogs on Alex's Cantata>Cobalt setup.

I haven't heard any of Luis' phones, except a Paradox very briefly so I have no opinion on those, but atm Alpha Dogs are probably my top closed full size phone, not that I would own them, though. Customs are much better sound, isolate even better, are a fraction of the weight, and often cost equal or less than some of the premium closed phones anyway. I'd have to sample some lower end CIEMs to compare at a fair price point to the Alpha Dogs, but I would imagine I'd take the CIEMs at even money.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Audeze LCD-XC
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2014, 11:06:04 PM »

Is the 2-3kHz hardness similar to the AKG K701/K702/Q701 peak? Something about the K702/65 is really uncomfortable for me.
Logged

TMRaven

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +34/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
Re: Audeze LCD-XC
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2014, 12:59:16 AM »

AKG phones sound cold.  The XC just sounds forward.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Audeze LCD-XC
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2014, 01:10:56 AM »

That's good at least. Definitely helps to have some bass response too. Were they everything you hoped for??
Logged

TMRaven

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +34/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
Re: Audeze LCD-XC
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2014, 01:20:52 AM »

They were more than I had hoped for.  I thought they'd be too cold for my taste and too bass lacking.  Turns out they seem (from memory of LCD2) to be more engaging from treble to bass-- even with possibly more bass than the LCD2.  The popular opinion has been that the X and XC have overall less bass response than LCD2 and LCD3.

As I said before I wish I had an LCD2 with me now for a proper side-by-side.  There could have been a couple of reasons for my differing opinions of the two:

1. LCD-XC being fed from asgard2/uberfrost vs LCD2 fed from magni/modi
2. I might have a 'good' XC while I might of had a 'bad/veiled' LCD2
3. I came into to the LCD2 with high expectations and the XC with so-so expectations

All I know is the XC makes me want to move on from my HE-400 while the LCD2 did not.

Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Audeze LCD-XC
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2014, 03:01:32 AM »

1.
2.
3.


All of the above. Caution I urge. The XC is the opposite of the HE-400 in many respects.
Logged