CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:45:52 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material  (Read 403 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dBel84

  • Ortho Ninja
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +86/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 341
Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« on: December 03, 2012, 07:41:08 PM »
I thought I would do some sleuthing and perhaps start collecting some information on various diaphragm materials to possibly correlate to some of the measurement characteristics that we see.

I have not cataloged much data and it was really only a thought that solidified after seeing the unique material used in the Beyer T50p





I am not sure it shows clearly, but the material is similar to a slightly stiffened gel. It remains soft and maleable but retains it's form. I have opened my fair share of drivers and this is the most unique (dynamic) driver I have ever come across. Most other drivers are some type of mylar or metal. Without getting into the numerous variations of planar and others such as the HD800, I wonder if some of the ringing and interesting CSD patterns can be correlated to the diaphragm material itself.

Just a thought, feel free to shoot the thought down.

..dB
Logged

sachu

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +75/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 535
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2012, 09:37:08 PM »
Like conventional speakers, there will definitely be some correlation between diaphragm material across drivers. However, the Voice coil diameter, qts and bl parameters for the driver will determine the differences between the drivers assuming material , size remain the same.
Logged

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2012, 09:39:55 PM »
Wow, so the diaphragm isn't stiff?  I imagine it's the same diaphragm as is used on the DT1350, which is pretty darn clean and flat.  (or at least can be if you get the right one...)
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2012, 09:45:37 PM »
OMG, Beyer is using scrotum for drivers?!   :P


Driver material absolutely impacts its sonic signature so there should be correlations.  Silk domes don't sound like titanium which sounds different than ceramic, aluminum, bio cellulose or paper and bamboo.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Tari

  • Poet Laureate of Changstaria
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +245/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 854
  • Is tari a wizard
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2012, 09:53:41 PM »
I don't have much to add on the material front other than to say it was obvious with a little modding that there was a whole lot of potential in those drivers.
Logged

dBel84

  • Ortho Ninja
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +86/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 341
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2012, 11:04:12 PM »
Yes I suspect that the 1350 and the 50p are pretty much the same except that the T50p has no damping and sounds like garbage until you give it a little TLC and then it sounds incredible.

I get the whole speaker world cone material effect , it is just that 90% of headphone drivers I have seen look amazingly similar. I know that there are multitudes of driver images on headfi , I will do some mining and see if I compile ( or at least start a compilation ) of drivers.

these are AKG k141 - 501 drivers


but later k701 look very different


Feel free to join in and post drivers

- I can always edit the first post and keep all images contained if that makes sense

edit  - I see that there are in fact MANY variations on the theme, I have lived a sheltered life - too much planar obsession.

Here is an early DT770 Beyer driver - looks remarkably similar



..dB

« Last Edit: December 03, 2012, 11:14:01 PM by dBel84 »
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #6 on: December 03, 2012, 11:20:48 PM »
Sony Vectran, Liquid Cystal Polymer, Bio Cellulose
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

devouringone3

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Powder Monkey
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +2/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
    • My YouTube comments
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2012, 12:43:01 AM »
Foster's thin microfiber + (what looks like a) mylar flexure drivers:
(Creative Live Aurvana!)
(Denon AH-D2000)
(Denon AH-D7100)
« Last Edit: December 04, 2012, 12:48:52 AM by devouringone3 »
Logged
"The main purpose in designing the Grado Signature earphones was [...] most of all to motivate my colleagues, competitors, and otherwise to get off their butts and design and build products like I know they are capable of." – Joseph Grado

arnaud

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +40/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 170
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2012, 12:48:52 AM »
Diaphragm material and coating is certainly going to affect its structural damping, a key parameter if there happens to be mechanical resonances over the audio range.

Furthermore, diaphragm material, thickness, geometry and driving method (e.g large or small voice coil) is going to determine the presence and frequency of mechanical resonances.

I suspect the variations in tonality between tweeter materials lies in the variations in frequency and damping of its mechanical resonances. And the same likely occurs with headphone diaphragms.

Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Headphone Driver : Impact of diaphragm material
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2012, 06:42:50 PM »
In general (from speaker world):
  • More rigid materials = more peaky breakup/resonance modes, faster decaying CSD (outside of the resonance peak), more articulate sound
  • Less rigid materials =  breakup more evenly distributed, less ringing, but overall slower decaying, less defined sound
  • Better quality/design magnet/voice coil/motor = less mid/high distortion
  • Larger driver = less bass distortion
  • Smaller driver = more bass distortion
  • Larger driver = breakup modes/peak(s) at lower frequency
  • Smaller driver = breakup modes at higher frequency (ideally out of audio band)
Weird ridges / bumps = trying to get the best of both worlds - adding more rigidity while getting the faster decay

Here's one of my favorite small woofers. Very resolving, articulate, and fast: http://www.seas.no/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=87

Horrible ringing at 8kHz. Good thing it's a woofer where we can cross over at 2kHz.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »