CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:26:10 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot  (Read 9424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MuppetFace

  • Miss Anna Logg
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +119/-6
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
  • First you get a swimming pool full of liquor...
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2012, 06:47:33 PM »

I own the PRO 2900, which is the open version of the PRO 900, and IMO it's one of the worst headphones I've ever spent money on, but to be fair it was originally supposed to be a gift for my ex.

The PRO 900 is even bassier, but both have this awful metallic timbre to my ears. They're also some of the most sibilant headphones I've ever heard. Ever.

It's the sibilance that ultimately makes them unlistenable for me. It hurts like hell.
Logged
My blog on head-fi: http://www.head-fi.org/f/7879/muppetface
I mostly talk about music there. Weird.

Anathallo

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +7/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 100
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2012, 07:02:42 PM »

I heard an Ultrasone Pro 2900 once and it was honestly the worst thing I've ever heard.  I got no enjoyment, no immersion, no emotion out of the music I love.

It was a terrible listening experience.  I don't understand what people find appealing in Ultrasones.
Logged

Questhate

  • Stops to get gas, buys some stax.
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +83/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 916
  • Banned for putting ice cubes in fine Scotch
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2012, 07:08:33 PM »

Yeah that metallic treble is a problem with all Ultrasones I've heard/owned to varying degrees. It's like a cyborg approximation of real music. It's not that noticeable if you listen exclusively to EDM, but put real instruments on and things sound off in a hurry.

I wonder what causes that because I don't think I've run across that in another headphone yet it's characteristic of all Ultrasones.
Logged

arnaud

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +40/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 170
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2012, 12:57:25 AM »

@extrabigmehdi -- depends what you find enjoyable. These definitely aren't audiophile caliber. These are for people who put 15" subs in their car and EQ the bass all the way up, or people who go to techno nightclubs wearing Versace shirts with the first four buttons-undone.

hehe.  headbang
Logged

Parall3l

  • Guest
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2012, 02:33:48 AM »

My subjective impression some what matches the others in this thread as well. Although I do find the bass to be rather pleasant personally because I just like that kind of sound. (I must admit I do EQ up the bass in the car stereo) The treble is really getting fatiguing though, when I first got the PRO900 the treble emphasis did feel somewhat pleasant with my music, but now it just gets annoyingly loud.

The HE400 is looking more and more attractive now.... :wheel:
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2012, 03:26:57 AM »

This has been and still is the worst headphone I have ever heard, followed by the 1440.  Both were walls of different kinds of noise.  The treble stabbing and bass are just evil to my ears.  The best pro900 I ever heard was the one that was broken/blown. 
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Solderdude

  • Grab the dScope Kowalski!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +206/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
  • No can do skipper, the dScope was terminated
    • DIY-Audio-Heaven
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #16 on: October 21, 2012, 07:40:31 AM »

I have (very briefly) owned the Ultrasone Proline 2500 and selected it by the original graphs sent to me by Ultrasone on request.

It is quite flat and had good hopes it would sound really good as well.
Sounded 'boomy' and the highs were anything but pleasant.  :(
Not too much of it, but most of all not 'nice'.
I suspect a lot of effen' ringin'. ???


This is the plot of the 900 taken by Ultrasone.
 :vomit:  Nauseating by the looks of it eventhough it was recommended to me by a bass player who said it was one of his favorite headphones.
a VERY CLOSE resemblance to Purrin's plots, so hat's off to his measuring skills.

I wasn't interested in the uber-expensive edition line but FWIR it sounds 'better'.
Never had the pleasure of hearing those.
Logged
Use your ears to enjoy music, not as an analyser.

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2012, 07:57:07 AM »

Pleasure?

Crazy how similar the graphs are thanks for posting. Though id say that what surprises me is not how close purrins graphs are but how close Ultrasones are.  ;)
Logged

Solderdude

  • Grab the dScope Kowalski!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +206/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
  • No can do skipper, the dScope was terminated
    • DIY-Audio-Heaven
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #18 on: October 21, 2012, 09:24:26 AM »

The 2500 and 900 indeed aren't that dissimilar on closer inspection.
It's the vertical scales that make them look quite different.
The highs of the 900 should be 'better' in FR quantity than the 2500 even, perhaps with some EQ in the lows...
Ah well, the ringing will still be there..
It was the 'overblown' bass, and highs that killed it for me, sounding grainy and rough.
I held on to it for a while and gave it a few chances but was gone within 2 weeks already.

2500 and 900 mids (between say 200Hz and 5kHz) aren't that bad within 5dB, though the 2500 has less dips.
Pro900@50Hz =+15dB, Pro2500@50Hz =+9dB
Pro900 between 5k and 20k =+ 3dB (average), Pro2500 between 5k and 20k =+6dB (average)
The 'flatness' of the 2500 appears to be an optical illusion.  :)p18

I also have plots for: HFI650, HFI700, HFI780, HFI2200 and Pro750 for those that are interested.


Logged
Use your ears to enjoy music, not as an analyser.

Torpedo

  • Guest
Re: Ultrasone Pro900 (Not-Defective) Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plot
« Reply #19 on: October 21, 2012, 11:17:26 AM »

If possible at all, I'd like to see the plots for HFI2200, thanks.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5