Ti flat-out said here that the opamp used doesn't work properly at the voltages it is specified at. He has repeatedly said that, in testing, the opamp was unstable at higher voltages - would you like me to go quote-hunting? He explicitly states here that the claims of AD are not correct.

Please, explain in what way that quote is out of context. I fail to see how you could arrive at a reading of " despite the datasheet's claim of 24V rating, the AD8397 is not stable at such voltages" that does not suggest that the datasheet's claims are wrong. Feel free to enlighten me...

The evidence (you know, the datasheet compiled by professional engineers with state of the art instrumentation) would suggest that it does work at those voltages. That, to my mind, should cast some aspersions on the quality of at least that individual design.

I have absolutely no crusade against Ti. I just call stuff out when I see it. I think this was a pretty clear call, as the individual involved has actually stated that he holds the opinions which I implied that he held. I feel very similar about AudioGd, Burson, ect...the 'crusade' is a product of your own 'delusional' imagination.

Seriously, you're reading stuff into my posts that isn't even there half the time. I write something that has nothing to do with the O2, and I get purrin ranting about the O2's PCB design, and now I'm orchestrating a mass BS campaign against AMB through a mix of malice and idiocy, because I pointed out that he was making unreasonable claims about the opamp he was using, which should raise alarm bells, IMHO.

But yeah. I'm obviously an asshole who hates everybody - just check my previous posts before this thread (40 out of 42ish). Nothing but bile right?