CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:06:48 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

Author Topic: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800  (Read 15568 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

victor25

  • Have you seen my Adderall?
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +6/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 165
  • Partytime!
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #40 on: March 24, 2013, 11:20:24 PM »

I like pop too. Its amazing we live in a day and age where we get to listen to this infinite amount of music. I love classical, pop, jazz, rock and so on. Its not weird for Schubert, Taylor Swift and Jimi Hendrix to be played on the same night here.
Logged

ROK

  • Guest
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #41 on: March 24, 2013, 11:26:36 PM »

I like to listen to sentimental korean pop with female vocals. I didn't expect HD800 to perform this well, and with Anax mod, it's pretty damn good.
Logged

AstralStorm

  • Speculation and Speculums
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +250/-164
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 559
  • Warning: causes nearby electronics to go haywire
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #42 on: March 26, 2013, 08:44:48 AM »

Eh, the 6k peak in HD800 causes some synth and trumpets to sound ear-piercing, didn't do one thing to vocals and is compensated by the 3k dip when it comes to cymbals and guitars, just causing a coloration change. Makes for a flatter soundstage than expected given its sense of space.

Granted, I had only a 30 minute listen of those...
Logged
For sale: Hifiman HE-500; Paradox; Brainwavz B2. PM me if you would like to buy them.

firev1

  • Cynophobic Puss
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +52/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #43 on: August 22, 2013, 04:30:50 PM »

Currently having 2 HD800s with me, 1 my own and another my friend's which is on a long term loaner. S/N019XX for my friend's with thin cloth pads. As you guys have noted, these are bass light but I like them better since they seem a little more neutraish and the 6k resonance does not sound as bad.

Current pair I own is S/N14k~ they have more treble and also moar bass. A little more v-shaped than the older pair.

Shoot me, I will be using these to listen to jpop and watch cartoon porn.
Logged
Time spent on enjoyment is not time wasted. - someone

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #44 on: August 22, 2013, 09:35:23 PM »

Currently having 2 HD800s with me, 1 my own and another my friend's which is on a long term loaner. S/N019XX for my friend's with thin cloth pads. As you guys have noted, these are bass light but I like them better since they seem a little more neutraish and the 6k resonance does not sound as bad.

Current pair I own is S/N14k~ they have more treble and also moar bass. A little more v-shaped than the older pair.

Shoot me, I will be using these to listen to jpop and watch cartoon porn.

Swap pads and report back if u can.
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

firev1

  • Cynophobic Puss
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +52/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #45 on: August 23, 2013, 02:15:50 PM »

Swapped the pads once and on brief listen, seems that the older pads do take out some of the treble of the HD800s and I do think the stage presented is different with the newer pads sounding wider than the old ones.

As for product variances, the 2 HD800s I have are virtually identical in sound with the newer one I THINK sounding to have slightly(~1db?) more 6khz than the older one.

Logged
Time spent on enjoyment is not time wasted. - someone

transparent201

  • Probably 14
  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +3/-54
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #46 on: September 09, 2013, 05:49:20 PM »

Goldenears.net has retested HD 800(objectively and subjectively).
http://en.goldenears.net/index.php?mid=GR_Headphones&category=275&document_srl=22602
Very strange results. It seems as though the elevated treble and midrange resonance of the previously tested model gave the false impression of excellent transparency.
Apart from this, some people say that HD 800 is mild/soft(e.g. avguide review) while others find them very sharp and transparent.
Logged

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #47 on: September 09, 2013, 06:55:18 PM »

Goldenears.net has retested HD 800(objectively and subjectively).
http://en.goldenears.net/index.php?mid=GR_Headphones&category=275&document_srl=22602
Very strange results. It seems as though the elevated treble and midrange resonance of the previously tested model gave the false impression of excellent transparency.
Apart from this, some people say that HD 800 is mild/soft(e.g. avguide review) while others find them very sharp and transparent.

Another goldenears fiasco...

That's the most mismatched HD800 I've ever seen.  And we've measured more than 10 units by now.  I'm going to chalk it up to user error based on his inconsistent results and subjective impressions.  I've also heard more than five HD650s and never have I heard them as being more 'transparent' than any HD800.  That's just absurd.  Probably what happens when he pairs the HD800 w/ his mysteriously unknown 'Goldenears' amp.  It's been well known from tons of impressions the HD800 will react with and display whatever is upstream more than any other phone.  His own inconsistent measurements and impressions point this discrepancy out.  Our consistent ones indicate it's not the headphone that's the problem.

Just so people know if they don't already, all the dynamic headphones measured on this site use my O2 amp.  Mostly to satiate the 'objective' crowd for a 'reference' amp (lol).
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu

Solderdude

  • Grab the dScope Kowalski!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +206/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
  • No can do skipper, the dScope was terminated
    • DIY-Audio-Heaven
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #48 on: September 09, 2013, 06:58:35 PM »

At least they did a better job than the previous time they measured it.  8)
The CSD seems 'better' now.  ;)
FR is accurate (I think).
At least the few times I heard the HD800 I perceived it that way.

Strange that the 'subjective' score now is further away from 'ideal' as it was described in an earlier (and clearly faulty) measurement (this one http://en.goldenears.net/4326 I mean)

Impulse response is now excellent, would dare to say exemplary.
a little EQ improves it considerable.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2013, 07:05:59 PM by Solderdude »
Logged
Use your ears to enjoy music, not as an analyser.

Anaxilus.

  • Dikus Beligerantis Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 577
Re: HD800 Variability Measurements Starting with Jason's HD800
« Reply #49 on: September 09, 2013, 07:11:26 PM »

FR is accurate (I think).

Which?  The right or left channel?  Perhaps he forgot to check for hairs on the left side... ::)
Logged
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading - Lao Tzu
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6