Topic: Beyer DT1350 #2 Frequency Response (Read 7577 times)

maverickronin · « **Reply #20 on:** March 14, 2012, 04:43:16 AM »

I didn't see any CSDs from full size 'phones on there, only IEMs. Too bad. Another comparison would be cool.

slwiser · « **Reply #21 on:** March 14, 2012, 09:38:39 AM »

It is to bad you could not listened to my DT1350s in it's balanced configuration. These are do so much more on the imaging side of things when balanced out of my SR-71B. This is my preferred listening configuration with these.

Since the above comment I have moved on from using the SR-71B to using my ALO Rx Mk3-b amp. This now is preferred over the SR-71B for my use. The SR-71B is much darker sounding than the Mk3.

anetode · « **Reply #22 on:** June 25, 2012, 12:13:16 PM »

All right, I might be daft, but here's the comparison graph that was posted nine days ago:

http://cdn.head-fi.org/c/cd/cd453274_41fe98e5_x3DT1350.gif

Then here's the one posted in this thread and 5 days ago at head-fi:

http://cdn.head-fi.org/3/31/31c36f33_index.jpeg

Are you sure that the latter is a measurement that includes compensation for the bass-oddity?

edit: nvm, saw the differences, only still flabbergasted. at least the channels match

Marvey · « **Reply #23 on:** June 25, 2012, 07:30:31 PM »

thanks for the lookout. seriously. i depend on the more astute persons to make sure things look right. yeah - the channels do match perfectly on this one. i wondering if someone at Beyer forgot to add damping materials or something.

Author Topic: Beyer DT1350 #2 Frequency Response (Read 7577 times)

maverickronin

Re: Beyer DT1350 #2 Frequency Response

slwiser

Re: Beyer DT1350 #2 Frequency Response

anetode

Re: Beyer DT1350 #2 Frequency Response

Marvey

Re: Beyer DT1350 #2 Frequency Response

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Author Topic: Beyer DT1350 #2 Frequency Response (Read 7577 times)