CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:18:33 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]

Author Topic: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots  (Read 15060 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

donunus

  • Cheapus Sexus
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +52/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 875
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #40 on: August 24, 2013, 01:27:48 PM »

These had a hint of warmness. Note they are 250ohm, not the 80ohm, which I did not think sounded as good as these.
80 ohm?
Logged
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound

Lumos

  • Guest
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #41 on: February 26, 2014, 11:10:06 AM »

FSI might get interested, headroom and innerfidelity have measured distortion differently. probably beyer improved drivers in late production or headroom messed up something. I traded DT880 600 ohm recently and definitely not hearing any obvious big flaw. Bass is cleaner compared to HD650 however fairly bright but very clean sounding overall.

http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/BeyerdynamicDT880600ohm.pdf
http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/BeyerdynamicDT880250ohm.pdf 

http://www.headphone.com/buildAGraph.php?graphID[0]=2751&graphID[1]=963&graphID[2]=&graphID[3]=&scale=30&graphType=1&buttonSelection=Update+Graph
Logged

melvin

  • Swabbie
  • Brownie Points: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #42 on: March 23, 2014, 09:26:43 AM »

Hey guys,

Thanks for the measurement. I'm considering these or the Hifiman HE-400. I'm leaning towards the HE-400 more but would this DT880 be considered more detailed and clean sounding than the HE-400? Additionally, I'm quite worried that the midrange of DT880 is too sucked out or boring than I'd like.
Logged

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #43 on: March 23, 2014, 02:00:23 PM »

I feel the midrange on the HE400 is kind messy. The DT880 is cleaner there and has better tonal balance all around, despite the extra bit of brightness. Get the 600 ohm if your amp isn't wimpy.
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #44 on: March 24, 2014, 03:39:13 AM »

I feel the midrange on the HE400 is kind messy.

^------

It depends upon what you are looking for. I like Greed's use of the word "messy" since I haven't found a good way to describe it yet. However, some people tend to hear this messy midrange more than others. A direct comparison makes it obvious in any case.

If the DT880 is too hot in the mid-treble, just put some tissue paper or felt pads over the driver, or use EQ. The HE-400 are bassy, recessed in the upper mids (guitars and trumpets can sometimes lack bite) with a lot of mid and high treble. The Jerg pads do help make the HE-400 more cohesive sounding, fixing the overly laid back upper mids somewhat.

The classic DT800 (250 or 600 ohm) versions are very very good headphones, but don't have bass quality (extension and speed) which is as good the HE-400. Do not get the 80 ohm version of the DT880.
Logged

Skyline

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +22/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 339
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #45 on: March 24, 2014, 01:18:17 PM »

Hey guys,

Thanks for the measurement. I'm considering these or the Hifiman HE-400. I'm leaning towards the HE-400 more but would this DT880 be considered more detailed and clean sounding than the HE-400? Additionally, I'm quite worried that the midrange of DT880 is too sucked out or boring than I'd like.
The DT880 midrange is not sucked out to my ears.  I don't know where that impression came from, but I've heard it a lot.  It seems like one person said it and then it spread rampantly like wildfire from there.  I have the 250 ohms...

Wish I'd heard the 400s to offer a comparison. 

What headphones are you coming from?
« Last Edit: March 24, 2014, 01:25:21 PM by Skyline »
Logged

N

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Powder Monkey
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +5/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
  • Audio agnostic
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #46 on: March 24, 2014, 02:42:20 PM »

Hey guys,

Thanks for the measurement. I'm considering these or the Hifiman HE-400. I'm leaning towards the HE-400 more but would this DT880 be considered more detailed and clean sounding than the HE-400? Additionally, I'm quite worried that the midrange of DT880 is too sucked out or boring than I'd like.
The DT880 midrange is not sucked out to my ears.  I don't know where that impression came from, but I've heard it a lot.  It seems like one person said it and then it spread rampantly like wildfire from there.  I have the 250 ohms...

Wish I'd heard the 400s to offer a comparison. 

What headphones are you coming from?

I'm of a consistent mindset. Perhaps the slightly colder tilt of the DT 880 may have distracted a particularly sensationalistic individual from a rather decent midrange presentation.
Logged

munch

  • Recoverig Shoutbox Addict & A Better Person
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +6/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • ยข
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #47 on: March 24, 2014, 05:15:14 PM »

the DT880-600 had a real midrange suckout for me. vocals sounded so distant... using my Gamma2->CKKIII setup. I have not heard the 250 Ohm version but I doubt they are all that different?
it wasn't just 'a little' so I'm a bit unsure what may have happened here :( quite alright headphone but just lacking any sort of intimate vocal presentation that I like.
Logged

Skyline

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +22/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 339
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #48 on: March 24, 2014, 09:25:53 PM »

the DT880-600 had a real midrange suckout for me. vocals sounded so distant... using my Gamma2->CKKIII setup. I have not heard the 250 Ohm version but I doubt they are all that different?
it wasn't just 'a little' so I'm a bit unsure what may have happened here :( quite alright headphone but just lacking any sort of intimate vocal presentation that I like.
The overall presentation isn't the most intimate, but it's all relative.

Compared to the HE-500 I auditioned recently, the 880s feel tinny and small and distant.  However, when I switched back and forth between the two, I felt the vocals were pretty similar.  It was the rest of the sound signature that set them apart.

Compared to the SRH940 I used to own, the 880s feel like the deepest, warmest, most intimate headphone you'll ever own :P
Logged

melvin

  • Swabbie
  • Brownie Points: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: DT880-250 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #49 on: March 25, 2014, 05:40:32 AM »

Wow thanks for all the replies.

If it helps, I would be amping both using a tube amp, but not the expensive ones. Say just the littledot mk3 or hifiman ef2a. In regards to the DT 880, would that somehow make them more intimate-sounding? I guess I should add that if it sounds tinny in the same way as Etymotic HF5 or ER4, then I don't mind since I like those IEM a lot.

Honestly for HE-400, I'm just intrigued in being able to own one (i.e planar type). If it's not any different than DT 880 on areas where its supposed to be unique (well i don't know what that means really), then I'm strongly leaning towards the Beyers..

Or throw in any other suggestions or comments if you want to. :-)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]