CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:27:09 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

Author Topic: OPPO PM-3 Review and Measurements  (Read 13885 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bill-p

  • Would you like graphs with that?
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +49/-14
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Midrange-head
Re: OPPO PM-3 Review and Measurements
« Reply #60 on: July 29, 2015, 04:43:14 PM »

So I finally got to audition this one in close details, and a few things jumped out to me. Please keep in mind my frame of reference is a modded HD600...

- There is certainly a lack of warmth with this headphone in comparison to the HD600. Something about the lower mids is lacking. Probably an FR thing? I certainly hear this thing much like most other closed headphones... which also seem to lack a bit of low mids. Maybe I'm spoiled by HD600?

- Upper midrange and lower treble is indeed a bit too elevated compared to my HD600. Nothing offensive, though, and I think I know the exact thing to do to even this out, as I have done with the HD600. At times, this emphasis causes a slight disconnect in the vocal range of some artists that I listen to regularly, so... it absolutely has to go.

- Low bass and mid bass are not as elevated as my reference. The PM-3 is actually a bit soft in this regard. Impact is not particularly strong with this headphone. And yes, I took off my glasses. The headphone didn't really change all that much. Upper bass and low mid are also lacking, as mentioned. Perhaps it's that the HD600 has a slight elevation down there that I hear? But ah well.

- Bass is indeed a bit thick, and blurry compared to my HD600. It's unable to represent the full gradations of volume changes in Little By Little (Caribou Remix), whereas the HD600 can effortlessly recreate those without mucking up the soundscape. The PM-3 does an okay job here, but impact and texture are lacking more so than I thought. Perhaps I need a new amp?

- Midrange is this headphone's strong suit. It sounds fairly even and nothing is spotlit. There are some hot spots in certain recordings that both my HD600 and ES10 kinda "hide". At times, I could swear this headphone is a bit... not smooth and refined. The HD600 is much smoother and more refined in this regard.

- Treble is actually causing me to hesitate to get this headphone. It's a bit scratchy, grainy, kinda muted and somewhat too shimmering at times. Probably 10KHz is elevated much more so than I'm used to, and either 3-4KHz is doing something weird that not only disconnects some vocals, but also causes bad hot spots to appear. Now, in its defense, it's not doing anything offensive, and all things considered, it's not sibilant, peaky, piercing, or annoying. It's just slightly too hot sometimes for my ears. The HD600 is much smoother and much more laid back in comparison.

- Soundstage is weird here. I swear this headphone has some good clarity in the midrange, but then... extensions and distortion control seem lacking at both of the ends (bass and treble), so sometimes things appear unexpectedly much closer than they should be, and much more in my face whereas there are also times the PM-3 convinces me I'm simply listening to the HD600 on a bad amp. There is much to be done here.

- Imaging is also an interesting aspect of this headphone. The extra treble emphasis causes a slight sharpening filter that kind of spotlights everything. However, fine details are still blurry, and separation is not particularly good. Probably has to do with bass or low mid distortion. Despite being smoother, less sharp, the HD600 has much better imaging than the PM-3, and can accurately represent some instruments to my ears. At least more so than the PM-3.

- Separation is also not a strong suit of this headphone. Things sound bunched up and kinda... shimmery. Guitars sometimes get lost in male vocals, and so on. Macro details are very spotlit, while micro details are kinda... smoothed over? Hard to explain, but I can definitely say that my HD600 is much more detailed than the PM-3, perhaps not so with macro details, but micro details are definitely more evident.

So... having said all that, I like this one! If I had to take a headphone with no mod, I probably would have grabbed this over the HD600, and pair it with a super warm amp to take care of the slightly hot treble. We'll see... but I'm highly considering purchasing a pair just so I can do... things to it.
Logged

money4me247

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Powder Monkey
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +9/-11
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 37
Re: OPPO PM-3 Review and Measurements
« Reply #61 on: August 18, 2015, 04:50:36 AM »

glad you like the PM-3. I am a bit curious about your impressions of a lack of warmth compared to the HD600? I would personally categorize the PM-3 a bit on the warmer side of the spectrum in relative comparison to the HD600.
Logged

Drakkard

  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +17/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Fischer Audio guy
Re: OPPO PM-3 Review and Measurements
« Reply #62 on: August 22, 2015, 01:03:53 AM »

I really liked them. I listened for about 10-15 mins only, but, possibly, one of the best portable headphone I've listened to. The only thing I've noticed - bass was a bit to much. I'm not sure how anyone can call it slow or lacking impact.. May be it have as big sound variation as LCD's? Also, treble is a bit rolling off, but nothing extreme. Air and soundstage pretty decent for a closed ortho.
My colleague told he heard some cup reflections and muddiness, but he listened from portable source, and I was using non-portable setup. Also I do not see measurements hint such behavior.
Logged

Bill-p

  • Would you like graphs with that?
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +49/-14
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Midrange-head
Re: OPPO PM-3 Review and Measurements
« Reply #63 on: August 25, 2015, 05:58:12 PM »

My HD600 is modded, so it sounds closer to the HD650 tonally, while having slightly less bass distortion overall compared to stock. Relative to that frame of reference, I think the PM-3 sounds quite a tad brighter.

Drakkard, I think I heard the 3-4KHz distortion spike in your graph very clearly from the stock PM-3. Now that I have gotten a PM-3 for myself and modded it, I think that distortion spike can be remedied to a significant extent. Everyone who heard my PM-3 and compared it to the stock pair also commented on that 3-4KHz spot being gone. One way to check for it would be to play "Tears in Heaven" from Eric Clapton's Unplugged album. His voice should not be spotlit.

I think I also heard that 200-500Hz depression from the stock headphone quite clearly, so it is probably more evident than it seems on the graph.

In any case, now that I have done some work to this headphone, I can tell that it does have the potential to be... different from how it is at stock. My preference would go toward faster, less muddy bass, and simultaneously smoother and less peaky treble. Will publish a modding guide after I have verified the results with a few more folks whose ears I trust.
Logged

kothganesh

  • Rebelious Stax Zealot
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +39/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 734
Re: OPPO PM-3 Review and Measurements
« Reply #64 on: August 26, 2015, 05:47:04 AM »

And finally, ship it to me right , Billy ?  ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]