Lobby > Vinyl Nutjob World

Experiments in Turntable Tweakage (AB comparison)

<< < (2/6) > >>

Clemmaster:
(click to show/hide)2 > 1. Fuller sound, more defined bass and better dynamics. By comparison, #1 sounds like it's recorded in a more reverberant room / more distant / less focused. It's clear from just the intro (up till the first cymbal crash - which sounds more raspy on #1.)

gurubhai:
(click to show/hide)2>1. The 2nd sample has better depth and air and is more natural sounding than the 1st one which is a bit too forward and appears a bit 'restricted' esp. in highs.

Marvey:
(click to show/hide)#1 has more prominent mids, slightly wall-of-sound effect, is more lively, but less controlled and dirty sounding. vocals and sax more forward in stage, rest of stuff in background but diffuse.

#2 has tighter bass, more precision, better damped.

I could go either way, slight tendency toward #1.

shaizada:
(click to show/hide)No contest on my side.  I like 2 much better than 1.  1 is smaller, more "tinny" and doesn't open up on instruments.  2 sounds bigger, more filled out and has more development of tones.

Edit:  Even after posting my comment above, I just re-listened.  1 just sounds more squished to me...I just don't like that kind of sound.

Anaxilus:

--- Quote from: shaizada on September 09, 2015, 11:16:37 PM --- (click to show/hide)No contest on my side.  I like 2 much better than 1.  1 is smaller, more "tinny" and doesn't open up on instruments.  2 sounds bigger, more filled out and has more development of tones.

Edit:  Even after posting my comment above, I just re-listened.  1 just sounds more squished to me...I just don't like that kind of sound.

--- End quote ---

Yup, it's got more of that tonal and dynamic compression as I like to call it. It's got that more forgiving sound some people like in their headphones and speakers. I'll refrain from naming brands.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version