CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:39:07 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6

Author Topic: Musings on Future Measurements  (Read 2201 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Donald North

  • DNA Audio
  • Pirate-at-Heart
  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +65/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 83
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #20 on: July 30, 2015, 09:12:46 PM »

I think it would be very interesting if we could develop an input-output comparator and watch real-time the behavior of an amplifier, both in the time and frequency domain, into a real pair of headphones.

OJ: you're a hardware guy...  :)p1
Logged

Solderdude

  • Grab the dScope Kowalski!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +206/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
  • No can do skipper, the dScope was terminated
    • DIY-Audio-Heaven
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #21 on: July 30, 2015, 09:20:03 PM »

Built one 30 years ago ...



In those days (audio days) I had to use a B77 to 'record' the diff files.
Now that could be done digitally and would be easy to analyse supersonic frequencies (I could not hear above 18.5kHz in those days)

There are also much better devices to make something like this.
Schematics everywhere...
Just google 'differential amplifier' and the rest is peanuts to add.


Unfortunately such a device mixes FR (amplitude), phase and time and translates them all to amplitude.
With modern ways of analysing it should be possible to 'extract' aspects by viewing more signals at the same time.
Logged
Use your ears to enjoy music, not as an analyser.

Donald North

  • DNA Audio
  • Pirate-at-Heart
  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +65/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 83
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #22 on: July 30, 2015, 09:26:26 PM »

That's cool - were you able to attain any meaningful insight from this differential data?

I wonder what those tapes sounded like...
« Last Edit: July 30, 2015, 09:44:34 PM by Donald North »
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #23 on: July 30, 2015, 09:30:18 PM »

Now I understand why my remarks were interpreted the wrong way and were seen as an attack instead of the (wished for) expansion of tests.

Basically a lot of us who were earnestly trying to mesh out the standards saw it as you thread-crapping.

--

On the comparator:

If the argument that tube amps do certain things better than solid-state amps is true, than it seems that a comparator (using solid-state parts or opamps) might not yield any meaningful results.

What I'd like to see is a method that can capture and present dynamic / transient behavior differences of amps - namely in amount of feedback. Feedback does wonderful things like tighten up the bass and extend FR, but it closes the soundstage and makes everything flatter and duller sounding.
Logged

Solderdude

  • Grab the dScope Kowalski!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +206/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
  • No can do skipper, the dScope was terminated
    • DIY-Audio-Heaven
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #24 on: July 30, 2015, 09:38:11 PM »

I think I did get valuable info from it.

Of course I can spill the beans but won't.
Everyone that takes measurements seriously and uses their hearing and test equipment SHOULD find out for themselves.
They are easy to build and operate and very educative.

Don't use it any more ... it did open my eyes in how to look at measurements and which type of measurements are valid and telling.

What I liked about it .....
Real music, real loads.
Works for amps connected to speakers, headphones only though, [edit] and cables.

Possible caveat ?
How do you hear 'soundstage' or 'air around instuments' in a diff file ?
You don't ....
BUT with the current state of tech, PC's sampling with 20 bits resolution at high bitrates and analysing software you might come a long way by now.

Real loads .... real music ... repeatability .... analyse.

Of course you have to deal with ground loops, cable arrangements, carefull nulling, phase and time aspects (a long wire or electronics has a relevant delay) would have to be tackled.
By using longer pieces of wire to counter time delays.

« Last Edit: July 31, 2015, 07:34:15 PM by Solderdude »
Logged
Use your ears to enjoy music, not as an analyser.

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #25 on: July 30, 2015, 09:40:34 PM »

I would use transformer summing instead of opamps ;) At least if this were going to be a real time sort of difference test
Logged

Donald North

  • DNA Audio
  • Pirate-at-Heart
  • Powder Monkey
  • *
  • Brownie Points: +65/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 83
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #26 on: July 30, 2015, 09:47:00 PM »

I hope those transformers will have silver windings and mumetal/nickel cores  :)p7
Logged

Solderdude

  • Grab the dScope Kowalski!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +206/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
  • No can do skipper, the dScope was terminated
    • DIY-Audio-Heaven
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #27 on: July 30, 2015, 09:52:54 PM »

Basically a lot of us who were earnestly trying to mesh out the standards saw it as you thread-crapping.

Get it now.... shouldn't have used the cheeky emoticons....



On the comparator:

If the argument that tube amps do certain things better than solid-state amps is true, than it seems that a comparator (using solid-state parts or opamps) might not yield any meaningful results.


Why ?
rethorical question as I understand where it comes from.
It comes from the notion/conviction/idea that transistors/opamps can't do what tubes can.
Let's just say I don't share your P.O.V. and see why you will probably not test this way, assuming an opamp cannot capture the effect.

Here is an idea for you to experiment with.
Play music on the tube amp and load with a headphone (or speaker)
record it using a PC (24bit many kHz) and play it back on an amp like the Rag.
Listen if 'the sound' is recorded and captured.
IF it has ... opamps can accurately follow it.
Can't do those tests myself. No access ... no time.

Yes... I also tested a (crappy, not high end) tube amp.
Was interesting to do.
Would like to do this again once with real tube amps.
Not in the business anymore nor access to high-end gear.



What I'd like to see is a method that can capture and present dynamic / transient behavior differences of amps - namely in amount of feedback. Feedback does wonderful things like tighten up the bass and extend FR, but it closes the soundstage and makes everything flatter and duller sounding.

You will need to create a signal that jumps from 0dB to say -70dB (which appears to me my limit when listening to loud extremely resolving speakers)
The signal needs to jump in level exactly around the '0'.
Reproduce it and look with a scope (not a digital recording) and see IF there is overshoot or the signal behaves other than the source.
Easy to see with 2 channnel scope and overlay.

That'll tell you which amp has problems.
Sort of a monotonicity test but with a much larger dynamic difference.
DC shifts will play a role as well, perhaps use a suitable high pass.
Certainly with non-balanced and coupled stages.
Logged
Use your ears to enjoy music, not as an analyser.

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Logged

Solderdude

  • Grab the dScope Kowalski!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +206/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
  • No can do skipper, the dScope was terminated
    • DIY-Audio-Heaven
Re: Musings on Future Measurements
« Reply #29 on: July 30, 2015, 09:58:04 PM »

I would use transformer summing instead of opamps ;) At least if this were going to be a real time sort of difference test

Trafo's may introduce higher distortions (hysteresis of the core), and won't do as well in frequency and phase response but the idea is intriguing.
When you have dual input windings you can easily change the phase if needed.
That would be a neat feature.
perhaps you could test it with the same signal on both input windings and see what it does.

You need to attenuate the input signal sligthly and match the other signal in amplitude to see how it nulls.
Would be elegant and fiully passive though.

Make sure there is NO DC present.
Logged
Use your ears to enjoy music, not as an analyser.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6