While he is as stubborn as folks at Hydrogen Audio, it is not wise to dismiss his knowledge on digital audio completely. There are many stuffs to learn from his debates with HA people.
You may be right, but I still think I'll stick with some other information sources.
Hydrogen audio has a dogma which might not suit many. I find it a useful balance (although I've given up some of fantasy-based audiophoolery stuff I used to hang around) but, personally, I can't live life in the the lab, I want to live it chatting over a drink too, so I like my objective with a dose of subjective and vice versa.
Jitter is something that has always bothered me because I suspect that, in audiophile-land, it gets used often by a lot of people who have no clue what it means or sounds like or what, technically, it is. I'm not talking Changstar: I doubt that there is anyone on this page who doesn't understand jitter far better than I do. But for the ordinary, non-engineer audiophile (like me!) it to to easy to think, wow, flutter, rumble, jitter and start supposing stuff that may, or may not, be true.
There are some sample files on hydrogenaud.io, with various levels of applied jitter. Whether one uses DBT with them or not (I didn't) it is interesting to get, at last, actual samples of actual jitter. I know that I had to go some way up the various intensities before I could hear it, but I do not make any claims other than personal preference, based on my own hearing, which is getting, according to the audiograms, quite bad.
I also understand that training and experience can enable people to detect digital artifacts: a necessary part of the skills of those working with digital audio, lossy file formats, etc.
