CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:11:44 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Kennerton Magister  (Read 3616 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Schopenhauer

  • Big Boobs Big Grin
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +20/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
  • Schopenmeower
Re: Kennerton Magister
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2015, 07:37:51 PM »

:)p13 Yes, the cans are a bit of a torture device when it comes to ergonomics.
Seriously. I have a vaguely large head, so it might not be as much of a problem for others. If the headphones didn't clamp so hard, they wouldn't be that bad. Weight seems fine. Cavities seem large and deep enough. I think the backs of my ears touch the inside of the pad very lightly; not bothersome for extended listening.
Logged

Hands

  • Pizza the Hutt
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +331/-8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1591
  • Master of Revelatory Bird Calls and Fine Art
Re: Kennerton Magister
« Reply #21 on: August 02, 2015, 08:53:10 PM »

How vague is your head? Nice and ethereal without any clearly defined boundaries?
Logged
The other master and I invite you to visit our digital museum of fine art and revelatory bird calls: https://www.facebook.com/SchrodsonkMuseum

Schopenhauer

  • Big Boobs Big Grin
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +20/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
  • Schopenmeower
Re: Kennerton Magister
« Reply #22 on: August 02, 2015, 09:09:35 PM »

It's like a cloud. A fog.
Logged

Schopenhauer

  • Big Boobs Big Grin
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +20/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
  • Schopenmeower
Re: Kennerton Magister
« Reply #23 on: August 04, 2015, 07:56:25 AM »

Did some comparative listening tonight v. the LCD-2.2. Will try to write some stuff up over the next few days. I should have noted in the earlier post that most of my listening was done with the low gain setting on the UHA-6S MkII. The high gain setting's increased dynamics doesn't suit my taste when listening to the Magister. I could run high gain in short bursts. Hell, it can sound great in short bursts - especially the bass. But the high mid to treble energy is too much for me.

I also need to post some impressions of the Algiz to the relevant thread.
Logged

Schopenhauer

  • Big Boobs Big Grin
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +20/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
  • Schopenmeower
Re: Kennerton Magister
« Reply #24 on: August 15, 2015, 07:39:01 PM »

The Magister has gone to Hans, so I’ll post my final impressions. I said previously that the tonality wasn’t for me. That was borne out by further listening. I want a headphone I can listen to for 2+ hours. I know people who can listen to, say, the HD800 for 2+ hours. I can’t. I find the HD800 too bright at 80+dB for extended listening. The same is true of the Magister. I consider the HD800 excellent for forensics, i.e. for subjecting a stretch of music to intense scrutiny for a brief interval of time. It’s also good for low volume casual listening. I wouldn’t classify the Magister as a forensic headphone. Neither did I like it for low volume casual listening.

Resolution isn't greater than the LCD-2.2’s. I’d say it’s less than. Easily obscured high midrange and treble information may have been – in some cases – more readily perceptible on the Magister than it was on the LCD-2.2. However, whenever I switched from the Magister to the LCD-2.2, I could hear the relevant information. The LCD-2.2 is less obvious with its riches. That makes it easier to relax when listening to it, I think. You can zoom in if you want to. Or you can keep your distance and enjoy top shelf macrodynamics.

It certainly seems like you’re paying for luxury with the Magister. And that’s fine. The Magister is a very fine thing; I admire the craftsmanship. From a purely acoustic perspective, however, I don’t know why I should choose it over an HD650, say, which is roughly half the price, or an LCD-2.2, which is more or less equally priced. Of course, both of those headphones are open. It’s slim pickings for a high-end closed headphone, so the Magister might recommend itself on that point. Still, among the closed headphones I’ve heard, I would rank it below the Slants and ADs in terms of my preferences (viz. tonality and timbre). But I’m an orthohead. YMMV.

Thanks to ultra for putting this loaner tour together. The Magister was a headphone I was, at the time, very interested in. I’m not sure the interest would’ve been sufficient to inspire an exploratory purchase that I now know would’ve been regretted. It’s good not to have to learn the hard way.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2015, 11:56:33 PM by Schopenhauer »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]