CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:39:36 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]

Author Topic: ER4S revisted (again for 4th time) versus UERM, ZA CT DX200, Klipsch R6R  (Read 7479 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Priidik

  • Not a dick!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +20/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
Re: ER4S revisted (again for 4th time) versus UERM, ZA CT DX200, Klipsch R6R
« Reply #40 on: August 31, 2015, 02:48:35 PM »

Even the DBA02 is less grey and more clear than the UERM.
Never heard ER-4, I guess ER-6 is noticeably inferior, still many have described similarities in their characteristics. Anyways very raw sounding vs ATH-CK10 (TWFK) I had back then.
I think I have wrong ear channels for Zeros, they sound dull and overly laid back to me.
Anax, OJ have you tried the ATH take on the TWFK, are these as good as DBA02-s?
Logged

OJneg

  • Audio Ayatollah / Wow and Fluster
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +120/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1245
Re: ER4S revisted (again for 4th time) versus UERM, ZA CT DX200, Klipsch R6R
« Reply #41 on: August 31, 2015, 05:32:34 PM »

Don't think I've heard that but I'm interested. I think Anax let me borrow some AT a while back (CK-50?) and it was simply not competitive in any way to my ears.
Logged

Anaxilus

  • Phallus Belligerantus Analmorticus
  • Pirate
  • **
  • Brownie Points: +65535/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3493
  • TRS jacks must die
    • The Claw
Re: ER4S revisted (again for 4th time) versus UERM, ZA CT DX200, Klipsch R6R
« Reply #42 on: August 31, 2015, 08:24:56 PM »

CK10 is very good. Similar to DBA-02, perhaps a touch more analytical up top but with better bass extension. I think the DBA had slightly better imaging and sense of dynamics while the CK10 was a little flatter in both dynamics and soundstage. Treble specifics and tidbits will vary based on fit and tips. DBA has great integration as it only has two drivers, the CK10 has no crossover network at all. Joker and myself did a couple of posts a few years back (perhaps in his thread?) about the differences between the CK10 and DBA-02. We both liked them for different reasons. He preferred CK10, I preferred the DBA.

Joker was always someone I could understand how and what he was hearing and we completely got where each other was coming from. Always appreciated that about him.

OJ, CK10 is nothing like the ATH-CKM500. Both are better than the ER4S imho. That single BA they use is simply being asked to do too much. It's just too obvious once you hear it struggle against something like the UERM, UE4, DBA02, CK10. The FAD BA-SS is about as good as I've heard a single BA but the price is difficult to justify.
Logged
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." - Lao Tzu

"The Claw is our master. The Claw chooses who will go or who will stay." - The LGM Community

"You're like a dull knife, just ain't cuttin'. Talking loud, saying nothing." - James Brown

Priidik

  • Not a dick!
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +20/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
Re: ER4S revisted (again for 4th time) versus UERM, ZA CT DX200, Klipsch R6R
« Reply #43 on: August 31, 2015, 08:35:19 PM »

Thanks!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]