CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:19:02 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots  (Read 6427 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2012, 10:49:45 PM »

I'd like to see how the DT48 measure being that they were made in the 50's.  Would add some nice evidence...

I'm guessing the only difference between the T50p and DT1350 at this point (now that they've given the 50 the 1350 pads) is that the 1350 has a little damping disc of some sort in the cup.  Whether it's accomplishing anything, I don't know...
Logged

RexAeterna

  • Gigolo of Gigolos
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +355/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1373
  • Friendship is magic
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2012, 11:52:37 PM »

very interesting. i didn't know the dt1350 had bad QC. i thought it was only with the T1 and other tesla line-up. maybe i can ask a friend if he be willing to send his DT48A(1960's model) for some measurements if interested. i'm personally curious about the dt48A and DT48S models the most but there so dang hard to get a hold of(well on ebay and stuff. i don't have 500 bucks to blow for a new pair of DT48A model and then you have to wait few weeks cause they're still hand built and matched since the 1950's).


Oh please, I've been dying to hear the DT48 forever.  Btw, I confused the 1350 w/ the T50p but seems they fall far from the tree anyway.

alllllriighty then. will go ask him later on tonight and see if he doesn't mind sending his DT48A out to be measured. i know he's interested on how well they do cause they're one of his favorites right next to my 240DF i loaned him while ago before to let him try them out.
Logged
''I'm a music lover. Not an audiophile.''

''The World is Study.''

''I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious.''

''Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.''

CEE TEE

  • Master controller of all scores
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +98/-338
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 839
  • Need More Time To Loaf Around
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2012, 12:39:20 AM »

This matches what I thought I heard when I borrowed them.


Nothing "peaky" but something seemed "scooped".


They seemed "small and closed" at first, but did seem "bigger" after I relaxed into them.


The build quality felt really good (hardware).  Shame if drivers not matching with the apparent level of build quality.
Logged
sound soft harmonics rich bile rich rhyme

shipsupt

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +160/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1687
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2012, 03:33:53 AM »

Really interesting.  While many argue that they are actually warm sounding, most seem to agree that  they find the 1350 cold and analytic, I can agree with that, but with the seal right I'm not going to agree with "thin". 

The 4db of channel imbalance baffles me!  I'm ussually super sensitive to things being off center (drives me nuts) and I feel like I would have heard that!  Hmmm...

Overall, I have had similar impressions of a slightly off tone... Easier to live with if you stick with them and let your brain forget what "right" sounds like, but pretty apparent when you first get them on after listening to something else.  This is a problem for me because these are not my one and only headphones...they are typically filling in at the office on the same day I'll be listening to full sized stuff at home.

The thing that kills it for me with these is that the seal is super hard for me to get consistently and when I do it's generally not comfortable.  Why fight with these when I can grab the 25-1 II (whose treble doesn't bother me) or the V-moda which is so easy to live with all around.

Thanks Marv for doing the late night work and posting up the measurements.

Logged
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

maverickronin

  • Objectively Sound
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +58/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 670
  • Your friendly neighborhood audio skeptic
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2012, 03:49:40 AM »

One thing to be aware of is that I think my measurement system is a little bit off in terms of measured FR tilt when it comes to the supra-aurals.

I'm not sure on the details of your rig but positioning tends to be pretty important for sealed supra aurals like those.  OTOH the consistency of the Senns would indicate that Beyer really does have a lot of work to do on matching their drivers and its not some artifact.

I like the sound of my pair though.  I think I can hear the ringing at ~15kHz but other than that I like them.  Maybe I got lucky with a good pair or something.
Logged
Heaven's closed - Hell's sold out - So I walk on Earth.

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2012, 04:52:41 PM »

"Thin" would definitely not be the word to describe these. "Cold" would be too much. Maybe "cool?"

The channel imbalance thing is odd, I re-calibrated and measured several times to confirm. It's hard to pick up because the higher frequencies are decently matched - compared to the lower frequencies which are totally off. Most spacial information (and the all-important harmonics) is contained in the higher frequencies.

@Ss: Once you get them back, you'll notice the bass and mids are louder on the left.

This is very obvious with test tones. There's no doubt in my mind that these headphones would sound less "cool" and "off" if the channels were matched properly (that is with the one with the better FR.) It would bring out the overall bass - since bass seems especially missing on the right channel. It's very hard to detect channel imbalances with headphones anyways when compared to speakers.

I'll be making my usual report on HF and shame Beyer again. Maybe you can get a refund?
« Last Edit: March 05, 2012, 05:49:42 PM by purrin »
Logged

shipsupt

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +160/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1687
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2012, 06:18:36 PM »

 ??? FS... Slightly imbalanced... I'll keep listening and see if I can live with them now that I'm going to be listening for it.  It will be interesting to see the response on HF, there are a lot of fans who aren't going to want to hear any criticism.

Beyond QC it does make me give more credit to those that claim additional cost for driver matching, well those that actually seem to do it anyway.
Logged
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

rhythmdevils

  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +131/-65535
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Team Cheap, Picky Basterds
    • www.my40dollarorhosarebetterthanyour1kflagship.com
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2012, 06:51:08 PM »

One thing to be aware of is that I think my measurement system is a little bit off in terms of measured FR tilt when it comes to the supra-aurals.

I like the sound of my pair though.  I think I can hear the ringing at ~15kHz but other than that I like them.  Maybe I got lucky with a good pair or something.

Send your pair in!   ;)
Logged

maverickronin

  • Objectively Sound
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +58/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 670
  • Your friendly neighborhood audio skeptic
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #18 on: March 07, 2012, 04:59:41 PM »


Send your pair in!   ;)

I'd like to but I think I need to sell them pretty soon, even though I do like the sound of them.  I need some cash and I just don't have as much use for a pair of portable supras as I though I would.

I enjoy their sound, especially the super deep bass, but the comfort pretty much restricts them to using on the go.  They're less comfortable and don't sound as good as my T50RPs which rules them out for home listening.  IEMs are more comfortable and convenient if I'm going to be listening for longer periods of time since they're a pain to take on and off.  That's why I got the 1350s for throwing on and off for short periods of time or when I didn't want to risk the more delicate IEMs when doing something strenuous.

Those situations seemed to stop coming up too often right after I bought them.  I held on to them because I did like them but I hardly even listened to them for the reasons outline above.

Also, I did double check mine with a frequency sweep.  They aren't perfect and the louder side wanders back and forth a little but there's no wholesale mismatch with vocals coming from off center like the pair purrin measured.

My YH-3s are kind of like that which is why I haven't put any effort into modding them.  The differences don't start until you get down into the bass.  One driver goes like 2-3 octave lower IIRC.  At first I though it was probably some sort of issue with the cup or pads sealing properly but I switched them and it still did the same thing.  Then I took them out of the cups and held the the bare drivers up to my ears and they did the same thing again so it has to be the drivers themselves that are different.

The weird thing is that I didn't notice it at first, at least consciously.  They gave me listening fatigue almost as fast as Grados but I didn't know why.  My father and brother had also listened to a track or two on them and didn't notice either.  Now that I know its there I can barely listen to them at all.

I also have another interesting anecdote about driver matching relating to my T50RPs.  The pair I currently use has drivers from two different pairs since I have a habit of accidentally ripping the leads off of the driver's flexible PCB.  (I've since started tacking the leads down with hot glue immediately after I open a pair up...)  Despite that it seems to have better matching than my DT1350 when playing test tones which seems like a pretty good testament to Fostex's consistency.  Interestingly, when playing actual music the T50RP's imbalance is quite a bit more noticeable than the 1350's, which I don't hear at all.  I think its because the T50RPs have much better imaging.  The drivers have the most noticeable imbalance in the high mids to low treble and with certain female vocals, especially high pitched Jpop singers, the vocalist's position wavers a bit as the pitch of their voice changes.  The imaging on a supra aural like the 1350 would probably never be that good and probably hide a lot of inconsistency.  That's not really a good excuse for Beyer though.
Logged
Heaven's closed - Hell's sold out - So I walk on Earth.

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Beyer DT1350 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2012, 05:36:26 PM »

I've heard some good Beyers obviously, but they seem to elude my measurements... I've got another DT1350 coming in. Maybe I'll grab one myself too.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3