CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:15:20 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14

Author Topic: Tascam TH02 Measurement  (Read 19977 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

kiteki

  • Guest
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #50 on: November 13, 2013, 09:06:48 PM »

In case someone wants to correct it using a very simple electronic filter below the schematic



Of course it only corrects FR in a coarse way and doesn't remove resonances and distortion.
I also noted some values in there for those who 'Purrinfied' one and would like to address the few dB lift in the mid region.

Wow, nice one!  Not sure how to read the schematic though =/.  Is it possible to make a filter for two bands at once like 200Hz and 10kHz?  Why is it resistors and stuff sound better than regular software EQ anyway?
Logged

Marvey

  • The Man For His Time And Place
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +555/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6698
  • Captain Plankton and MOT: Eddie Current
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #51 on: November 13, 2013, 09:58:06 PM »

Because you are using a shitty software EQ?

Easy to make a filter for two bands - just add another EQ circuit in series. It gets hairy very quickly though.
Logged

kiteki

  • Guest
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #52 on: November 14, 2013, 08:30:43 AM »

Because you are using a shitty software EQ?

Easy to make a filter for two bands - just add another EQ circuit in series. It gets hairy very quickly though.

I typically use whatever EQ my favourite sounding media players come with.  Perhaps the advanced ones sound just as good as hardware eq.

There is an aversion to all forms of EQ in high-end audio for reasons not well documented, the only transducer I know of which has attempted to 'fix itself' with an included proprietary equalizer is this one http://www.dsp-earphones.com/

If you're an iOS person, I'd be very interested to know what you think of how they sound actually.

Sorry for the off topic.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2013, 08:39:36 AM by kiteki »
Logged

arve

  • Swabbie
  • Brownie Points: +3/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #53 on: November 14, 2013, 12:52:01 PM »

I think he meant with the lids (each held by 3 pins) removed but the baffle still mounted to the cups and the earpads on and coupled to the instrument. This results in a slightly boosted midbass response, more recessed but cleaner mids and clearer highs in my experience.

Correct.  I'm curious to see how these would work out as open-back headphones (possibly also with polyfill)
Logged

spoony

  • 5 years late on rickrolling
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +13/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 274
  • ex c61746961
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #54 on: November 19, 2013, 02:07:09 AM »

No measurement rig but I'm pretty sure they work alright with an open back, maybe with a little more (paper) damping at the back of the drivers to lower the bass distortion, though I'm not sure the gain in resolution and air would be worth the loss in isolation. Try for yourself, I find the change kinda subtle with my rig.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #55 on: November 19, 2013, 02:32:51 AM »

Has anyone tried putting larger pads on these yet (aka circumaural)? I would like to try some, but I don't know where to start.
Logged

spoony

  • 5 years late on rickrolling
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +13/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 274
  • ex c61746961
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #56 on: November 19, 2013, 03:01:35 AM »

stratocaster mentioned the hm5 pads should fit, they are comfy and generally sound good wherever you put them.
Logged

Hands

  • Pizza the Hutt
  • Mate
  • Pirate
  • ****
  • Brownie Points: +331/-8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1591
  • Master of Revelatory Bird Calls and Fine Art
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #57 on: November 19, 2013, 05:32:58 AM »

I have a pair that should be in by the end of the week. I still can't believe how well these measure after mods relative to, say, the Abyss (understanding that doesn't tell the whole story, of course). I'm excited to see what they can do. I have some HM5 pads I can try out (always do!).
Logged
The other master and I invite you to visit our digital museum of fine art and revelatory bird calls: https://www.facebook.com/SchrodsonkMuseum

spoony

  • 5 years late on rickrolling
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +13/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 274
  • ex c61746961
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #58 on: November 19, 2013, 03:35:28 PM »

I put on my rotting SR-80s for shits last night and they sound decidedly low-fi and wonky in comparison. It's not all rosy, though, these are not up to par with $150+ open cans (hehe), I A-B'd again against some old DT990's and while I enjoy listening to these more than the beyers, they do not quite match up in some ways. I know the comparison is kinda unfair but I don't have any other closed cans handy.

If you are sensitive to treble issues you most definitely will want to take care of that peak, while not wholly bothersome and fatiguing like the Beyer treble, it does turn out to be distracting with certain kinds of music. Also, if you find the midrange somewhat veiled or the voices a little too back in the mix or not well defined, you will want to boost around 3 KHz because these are barely DF EQ'd. I cannot stand headphones tuned to the recommended 12dB peak, but a 3-5 dB boost I do find beneficial with these.

Have fun!
Logged

ultrabike

  • Burritous Supremus (and Mexican Ewok)
  • Master
  • Pirate
  • *****
  • Brownie Points: +4226/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2384
  • I consider myself "normal"
Re: Tascam TH02 Measurement
« Reply #59 on: November 20, 2013, 07:48:36 AM »

Marv lent me his TH-02s. They are plenty good, though I had some problems getting seal. They also seemed to fit me a bit too low even with the cups pulled all the way up.

I still felt a bit of wonky mids, but less than some other closed cans I've heard. Bass was well extended and clean when I got decent seal. To my ears the overall balance is on the laid back side of things.

Awesome :)p1 for the buck.

Some results (compare with after):



Frequency Response



Distortion right



Distortion left



CSD right



CSD left

« Last Edit: November 20, 2013, 08:13:50 AM by ultrabike »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14