CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:10:00 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

Author Topic: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400  (Read 9176 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #40 on: September 27, 2013, 03:58:25 PM »

It (the back vents) does seem quite detrimental to HE400s, unlike the more mild measurable changes on the HE500s. If I had designed the mod around HE400s in the first place, I would not have done the back vents anyhow, because HE400s do not have a metal bar welded across the middle of the drivers that like to irritate ears; also, HE400s are open-sounding enough, the backvents would not offer nearly as much soundstaging improvement as they do on the HE500s.

The vent definitely seems to work better with the HE-500. The measurement changes are minimal (especially when compared to the HE-400) and I'm sure that the open-ness is an improvement. Wonder if it's worthwhile to measure with a vent in the front and the back simultaneously (on the HE-500 ofc). From your impressions as well as other users on HF, the front vent seems to add even more air to the sound, but it doesn't help the driver irritation from the lack of space. Having two vents would solve that issue but I have a feeling that you might see a quicker bass roll-off... Alas, I don't even know what the HE-500's sound like!

You need at least a partial direct contact between the mounting ring and the cup for HE500's bass extension; having both sides lifted by vents (or anything else really) = literally no low~sub bass left. That's one of the first things I noted when I played around with pads.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #41 on: September 27, 2013, 04:08:14 PM »

You need at least a partial direct contact between the mounting ring and the cup for HE500's bass extension; having both sides lifted by vents (or anything else really) = literally no low~sub bass left. That's one of the first things I noted when I played around with pads.

Hmm, yeah, I figured as much. I like the idea of creating a pad system similar to the MA900 though (as you've mentioned several days ago). Obviously this would throw a lot of sub-bass out the window but I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem for a lot of users. It's just a matter of making a pad with two rings (one to mount to the headphone, one for the pad to mount to) which are at a 20° angle or so. Should provide for a fun, airy listen. Not sure if the HE-400 or HE-500 would be a better candidate though.
Logged

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #42 on: September 27, 2013, 04:13:25 PM »

You need at least a partial direct contact between the mounting ring and the cup for HE500's bass extension; having both sides lifted by vents (or anything else really) = literally no low~sub bass left. That's one of the first things I noted when I played around with pads.

Hmm, yeah, I figured as much. I like the idea of creating a pad system similar to the MA900 though (as you've mentioned several days ago). Obviously this would throw a lot of sub-bass out the window but I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem for a lot of users. It's just a matter of making a pad with two rings (one to mount to the headphone, one for the pad to mount to) which are at a 20° angle or so. Should provide for a fun, airy listen. Not sure if the HE-400 or HE-500 would be a better candidate though.

Kinda like an exaggerated backvent mod.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #43 on: September 27, 2013, 04:18:06 PM »

You need at least a partial direct contact between the mounting ring and the cup for HE500's bass extension; having both sides lifted by vents (or anything else really) = literally no low~sub bass left. That's one of the first things I noted when I played around with pads.

Hmm, yeah, I figured as much. I like the idea of creating a pad system similar to the MA900 though (as you've mentioned several days ago). Obviously this would throw a lot of sub-bass out the window but I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem for a lot of users. It's just a matter of making a pad with two rings (one to mount to the headphone, one for the pad to mount to) which are at a 20° angle or so. Should provide for a fun, airy listen. Not sure if the HE-400 or HE-500 would be a better candidate though.

Kinda like an exaggerated backvent mod.

Bingo. Ortho soundstage monsters.
Logged

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #44 on: September 27, 2013, 04:38:54 PM »

You need at least a partial direct contact between the mounting ring and the cup for HE500's bass extension; having both sides lifted by vents (or anything else really) = literally no low~sub bass left. That's one of the first things I noted when I played around with pads.

Hmm, yeah, I figured as much. I like the idea of creating a pad system similar to the MA900 though (as you've mentioned several days ago). Obviously this would throw a lot of sub-bass out the window but I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem for a lot of users. It's just a matter of making a pad with two rings (one to mount to the headphone, one for the pad to mount to) which are at a 20° angle or so. Should provide for a fun, airy listen. Not sure if the HE-400 or HE-500 would be a better candidate though.

Kinda like an exaggerated backvent mod.

Bingo. Ortho soundstage monsters.

Something like the HE6 or perhaps the HE4 might be very suited for it then.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #45 on: September 27, 2013, 05:42:09 PM »

You need at least a partial direct contact between the mounting ring and the cup for HE500's bass extension; having both sides lifted by vents (or anything else really) = literally no low~sub bass left. That's one of the first things I noted when I played around with pads.

Hmm, yeah, I figured as much. I like the idea of creating a pad system similar to the MA900 though (as you've mentioned several days ago). Obviously this would throw a lot of sub-bass out the window but I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem for a lot of users. It's just a matter of making a pad with two rings (one to mount to the headphone, one for the pad to mount to) which are at a 20° angle or so. Should provide for a fun, airy listen. Not sure if the HE-400 or HE-500 would be a better candidate though.

Kinda like an exaggerated backvent mod.

Bingo. Ortho soundstage monsters.

Something like the HE6 or perhaps the HE4 might be very suited for it then.

Why do you say that? I'm not too familiar with those two...
Logged

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #46 on: September 27, 2013, 05:55:03 PM »

You need at least a partial direct contact between the mounting ring and the cup for HE500's bass extension; having both sides lifted by vents (or anything else really) = literally no low~sub bass left. That's one of the first things I noted when I played around with pads.

Hmm, yeah, I figured as much. I like the idea of creating a pad system similar to the MA900 though (as you've mentioned several days ago). Obviously this would throw a lot of sub-bass out the window but I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem for a lot of users. It's just a matter of making a pad with two rings (one to mount to the headphone, one for the pad to mount to) which are at a 20° angle or so. Should provide for a fun, airy listen. Not sure if the HE-400 or HE-500 would be a better candidate though.

Kinda like an exaggerated backvent mod.

Bingo. Ortho soundstage monsters.

Something like the HE6 or perhaps the HE4 might be very suited for it then.

Why do you say that? I'm not too familiar with those two...

I know HE6 is quite airy-sounding by nature (both in measurements and in subjective auditioning I did of them), even with crappy pads like stock pleathers. HE500, on the other hand, doesn't come close to that amount of "air" even if I have them playing without any pads. So it would make sense that you work with airy drivers to achieve the next level of soundstage, not something that is more handicapped.

HE400 is airy / open-sounding enough, however I find its soundstage presentation rather artificial (more-so than HE500).

As for HE4, it's all hearsay so don't take my word for it, just musings.

Logged

TMRaven

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +34/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #47 on: September 27, 2013, 06:14:33 PM »

How do you know if a soundstage is artificial or not?
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #48 on: September 27, 2013, 06:24:16 PM »

I'll be honest, I don't have a great ear for soundstage in general. I can understand the "airy" sound from the HE-400, due to the coloration, but I've never felt like they provided an out-of-head experience. This is partially due to my genres of choice being largely computer based -- not recorded.
Logged

TMRaven

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +34/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #49 on: September 27, 2013, 06:27:15 PM »

It's been my experience through multiple headphones that a more neutral or even emphasized upper midrange will make the headphones sound more up-front and in my head.  HE-400's upper-mid coloration helps make it seem very out of your head and layered at times.

Commenting about accuracy of a soundstage though, that's slippery terrain.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6