CHANGSTAR: Audiophile Headphone Reviews and Early 90s Style BBS

  • December 31, 2015, 09:10:00 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400  (Read 9176 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #30 on: September 17, 2013, 08:37:39 PM »

Just got home and tried out sealing the backside with electrical tape. Indeed, with the openings there, my HE500s have some serious rumble between 25 Hz and 40 Hz; with the openings fully taped up, 25-40 Hz becomes much more subdued and (to my ear) rolled-off, but also a bit cleaner-sounding. This is in contrast with my HE400s which do indeed sound meh in the sub-bass regardless of opening or no opening.

I'm eager to see how the measurements look with HE500 now!

Hopefully Modulor's pads will get to you soon, Marv, and since you are quite familiar with HE500's sound signature, maybe you could give some subjective impressions as well then.
Logged

AstralStorm

  • Speculation and Speculums
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +250/-164
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 559
  • Warning: causes nearby electronics to go haywire
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #31 on: September 17, 2013, 09:05:06 PM »

Purrin, care to measure these without the fuzz front? I suspect the fuzz is unnecessary and might actually hurt the sound.

Hmm, mine have less of a vent too, 50% less thick. I'll mod them to 100% w/ extra tape to prevent leaks elsewhere.
Logged
For sale: Hifiman HE-500; Paradox; Brainwavz B2. PM me if you would like to buy them.

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #32 on: September 17, 2013, 09:06:26 PM »

Purrin, care to measure these without the fuzz front? I suspect the fuzz is unnecessary and might actually hurt the sound.

Hmm, mine have less of a vent too, 50% less thick. I'll mod them to 100% w/ extra tape to prevent leaks elsewhere.

The velour is sewn onto the pads, no way to remove them without wrecking the modded pads.
Logged

AstralStorm

  • Speculation and Speculums
  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +250/-164
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 559
  • Warning: causes nearby electronics to go haywire
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #33 on: September 17, 2013, 09:07:57 PM »

Oh, I used the two-sided tape instead.

Hmm. There is one other mod, but it's not related to the pads - check if removing the grille and/or cloth (front, back) does something interesting to the sound - to my ears, it does.
Logged
For sale: Hifiman HE-500; Paradox; Brainwavz B2. PM me if you would like to buy them.

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #34 on: September 17, 2013, 09:13:01 PM »

Oh, I used the two-sided tape instead.

Hmm. There is one other mod, but it's not related to the pads - check if removing the grille and/or cloth (front, back) does something interesting to the sound - to my ears, it does.

It all does.

The dust screen fabric coupled to the pleather earpads helps attenuate the treble (relative to the thinner fabric in velour pads, or having no fabric at all).

The grill fabric seems to attenuate upper treble extension or something of that sort, because removing it definitely improves the clarity of upper treble / plankton extraction (whatever that means  ::)).

The metal grills themselves add some minor resonance in the upper mids ~ treble region, it's evident in pink noise tests with / without the grills.

The grill cloth / grills change the sound at such a small scale that they are fairly irrelevant when you put them beside mods to the earpads.
Logged

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #35 on: September 18, 2013, 04:13:52 AM »

Wow, the hump completely disappears. I gotta say, I'm a little surprised about that! I guess this is a great explanation as to why these pads sounded much bassier than the jergs I made for myself (my vent was much smaller than the vent on these). That said, the sub-bass adhesion mod isn't actually increasing sub-bass after all (unlike the HE-500).

In a way it does increase sub-bass with HE400 still, well...maybe not sub-bass, more like low-bass and the upper end of the sub-bass.

With HE500 the low-bass hump linked to the open backvents may actually carry onto sub-bass. Like I mentioned in a post earlier, to my ears the hump at sub~low bass just flat out sounds better subjectively than without. Our hearing naturally rolls off at very low frequencies, and this boost (again, HE500) is like a slight EQ to counteract that.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #36 on: September 18, 2013, 12:09:28 PM »

Wow, the hump completely disappears. I gotta say, I'm a little surprised about that! I guess this is a great explanation as to why these pads sounded much bassier than the jergs I made for myself (my vent was much smaller than the vent on these). That said, the sub-bass adhesion mod isn't actually increasing sub-bass after all (unlike the HE-500).

In a way it does increase sub-bass with HE400 still, well...maybe not sub-bass, more like low-bass and the upper end of the sub-bass.

With HE500 the low-bass hump linked to the open backvents may actually carry onto sub-bass. Like I mentioned in a post earlier, to my ears the hump at sub~low bass just flat out sounds better subjectively than without. Our hearing naturally rolls off at very low frequencies, and this boost (again, HE500) is like a slight EQ to counteract that.

What I meant to say is that the adhesion mod by itself is not actually doing much. The vent is what is causing the bass boost. It seems possible that the chamber between the driver and your ear is leaking sub bass frequencies when vented, and this makes some sense. However, the boost at 50Hz may be because the back pressure caused by closed chamber between the driver and ear (when not vented) is no longer there and the driver is allowed to push more air without resistance. I can't think of any other way to describe why the bass is nearly 5dB louder at 50Hz.

When I look at the FR, the HE-500 has a slight decline from  50Hz up to 1kHz. I think that this would make the transition into the vent mod much more gradual to the ear. Don't get me wrong, I was enjoying the hell out of the bass hump on my HE-400, I just think that I can make a better compromise (i.e. a smaller vent for a more gradual bass boost and more gradual roll off). As I've said, I would like to find why they sound somewhat hollow with modulor's revision of the pads. All of this trouble shooting seems to point to the vent mod because this particular vent does not provide for a very smooth curve. Bottom line though, I can't stress enough that his pads are far superior to mine overall. The build quality and the velour top mod are awesome. Also, I think his extra line of holes might be contributing to the smoother treble (treble was still on the tizzy side with my jergs).

What it comes down to is that these pads are a wonderful asset to these two headphones. Especially now that we can pin point several steps within the mod so that others can choose to do use them or not.  :)p5
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #37 on: September 27, 2013, 02:36:38 PM »

I just wanted to note that I have since removed the vents completely and the hollowness that was heard is now gone. The 50Hz boost provides for a fun listen, no doubt, but I wanted my mids back.

Mmmm...pianos... headbang
Logged

jerg

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +41/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #38 on: September 27, 2013, 03:23:14 PM »

I just wanted to note that I have since removed the vents completely and the hollowness that was heard is now gone. The 50Hz boost provides for a fun listen, no doubt, but I wanted my mids back.

Mmmm...pianos... headbang

It (the back vents) does seem quite detrimental to HE400s, unlike the more mild measurable changes on the HE500s. If I had designed the mod around HE400s in the first place, I would not have done the back vents anyhow, because HE400s do not have a metal bar welded across the middle of the drivers that like to irritate ears; also, HE400s are open-sounding enough, the backvents would not offer nearly as much soundstaging improvement as they do on the HE500s.
Logged

Thujone

  • Able Bodied Sailor
  • Pirate
  • ***
  • Brownie Points: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 261
Re: Fuzzy Jerg pad vs. pleather stock pad on HE400
« Reply #39 on: September 27, 2013, 03:46:12 PM »

It (the back vents) does seem quite detrimental to HE400s, unlike the more mild measurable changes on the HE500s. If I had designed the mod around HE400s in the first place, I would not have done the back vents anyhow, because HE400s do not have a metal bar welded across the middle of the drivers that like to irritate ears; also, HE400s are open-sounding enough, the backvents would not offer nearly as much soundstaging improvement as they do on the HE500s.

The vent definitely seems to work better with the HE-500. The measurement changes are minimal (especially when compared to the HE-400) and I'm sure that the open-ness is an improvement. Wonder if it's worthwhile to measure with a vent in the front and the back simultaneously (on the HE-500 ofc). From your impressions as well as other users on HF, the front vent seems to add even more air to the sound, but it doesn't help the driver irritation from the lack of space. Having two vents would solve that issue but I have a feeling that you might see a quicker bass roll-off... Alas, I don't even know what the HE-500's sound like!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6